Deborah Lupton1, Sophie Lewis2. 1. Vitalities Lab, Centre for Social Research in Health and Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia. d.lupton@unsw.edu.au. 2. Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A multitude of information sources are available to publics when novel infectious diseases first emerge. In this paper, we adopt a qualitative approach to investigate how Australians learnt about the novel coronavirus and COVID-19 and what sources of information they had found most useful and valuable during the early months of the pandemic. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a diverse group of 40 Australian adults in mid-2020 about their experiences of the COVID-19 crisis. Participants were recruited through Facebook advertising. Detailed case studies were created for each participant, providing the basis of a thematic analysis which focused on the participants' responses to the questions about COVID-19-related information sources. RESULTS: Diverse sources of COVID-19-related information, including traditional media, online media and in-person interactions, were actively accessed, appraised and engaged with by participants. There was a high level of interest in COVID-19 information as people grappled with uncertainty, anxiety and feeling overwhelmed. Certain key events or experiences made people become aware that the outbreak was threatening Australia and potentially themselves. Most people demonstrated keen awareness that misinformation was rife in news outlets and social media sites and that they were taking steps to determine the accuracy of information. High trust was placed in health experts, scientists and government sources to provide reliable information. Also important to participants were informal discussions with friends and family members who were experts or working in relevant fields, as well as engaging in-person in interactions and hearing from friends and family who lived overseas about what COVID-19 conditions were like there. CONCLUSION: A constantly changing news environment raises challenges for effective communication of risk and containment advice. People can become confused, distressed and overwhelmed by the plethora of information sources and fast-changing news environment. On the other hand, seeking out information can provide reassurance and comfort in response to anxiety and uncertainty. Clarity and consistency in risk messaging is important, as is responding quickly to changes in information and misinformation. Further research should seek to identify any changes in use of and trust in information sources as time goes by.
BACKGROUND: A multitude of information sources are available to publics when novel infectious diseases first emerge. In this paper, we adopt a qualitative approach to investigate how Australians learnt about the novel coronavirus and COVID-19 and what sources of information they had found most useful and valuable during the early months of the pandemic. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a diverse group of 40 Australian adults in mid-2020 about their experiences of the COVID-19 crisis. Participants were recruited through Facebook advertising. Detailed case studies were created for each participant, providing the basis of a thematic analysis which focused on the participants' responses to the questions about COVID-19-related information sources. RESULTS: Diverse sources of COVID-19-related information, including traditional media, online media and in-person interactions, were actively accessed, appraised and engaged with by participants. There was a high level of interest in COVID-19 information as people grappled with uncertainty, anxiety and feeling overwhelmed. Certain key events or experiences made people become aware that the outbreak was threatening Australia and potentially themselves. Most people demonstrated keen awareness that misinformation was rife in news outlets and social media sites and that they were taking steps to determine the accuracy of information. High trust was placed in health experts, scientists and government sources to provide reliable information. Also important to participants were informal discussions with friends and family members who were experts or working in relevant fields, as well as engaging in-person in interactions and hearing from friends and family who lived overseas about what COVID-19 conditions were like there. CONCLUSION: A constantly changing news environment raises challenges for effective communication of risk and containment advice. People can become confused, distressed and overwhelmed by the plethora of information sources and fast-changing news environment. On the other hand, seeking out information can provide reassurance and comfort in response to anxiety and uncertainty. Clarity and consistency in risk messaging is important, as is responding quickly to changes in information and misinformation. Further research should seek to identify any changes in use of and trust in information sources as time goes by.
Authors: Allan McDougall; Elizabeth Anne Kinsella; Mark Goldszmidt; Karen Harkness; Patricia Strachan; Lorelei Lingard Journal: Sociol Health Illn Date: 2018-01
Authors: Kira E Riehm; Calliope Holingue; Luther G Kalb; Daniel Bennett; Arie Kapteyn; Qin Jiang; Cindy B Veldhuis; Renee M Johnson; M Daniele Fallin; Frauke Kreuter; Elizabeth A Stuart; Johannes Thrul Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Cliodna McNulty; Eirwen Sides; Amy Thomas; Atiya Kamal; Rowshonara B Syeda; Awatif Kaissi; Donna M Lecky; Mahendra Patel; Ines Campos-Matos; Rashmi Shukla; Colin S Brown; Manish Pareek; Loretta Sollars; Laura Nellums; Jane Greenway; Leah Ffion Jones Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Penelope A Robinson; David C Levy; Claire Hooker; Ramon Z Shaban; Shizar Nahidi; Julie Leask; Kerrie E Wiley Journal: Health Promot J Austr Date: 2022-03-25