Peter A Lichtenberg1, Maggie Tocco2, Rebecca Campbell3, Marie Shipp4. 1. Institute of Gerontology and Merrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Distinguished University Service Professor of Psychology, Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA. 2. Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA. 3. Institute of Gerontology and Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA. 4. Department of Health and Human Services, State of Michigan, Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
Objectives: Lichtenberg et al. reported on the implementation of a 10-item financial decision-making screening scale (Financial Decision Tracker-FDT) in a state-wide Adult Protective Services (APS) project. This study examined which of the seven scored items, reflecting the Appelbaum & Grisso decisional abilities model, were most sensitive to decision-making deficits. Methods: The Financial Decision Tracker was administered to 445 adults aged 60 years of older during APS investigations of financial exploitation. APS workers administered the FDT as part of their financial exploitation investigation. Overall, seven scored FDT items were compared using T tests. Results: Six of the seven risk-scored items were significantly different between those with and without decision-making deficits. Two of the items had small effect sizes, and four items had moderate effect sizes. The larger, moderate effect sizes were related to risk to financial well-being (appreciation), impact on finances (understanding), and who benefits most from the decision (understanding).Conclusions: The main findings of the study supported the Appelbaum and Grisso's decision-making model and the ability of specific items related to understanding and appreciation to differentiate between individuals with and without financial decision-making deficits.Clinical Implications: The FDT is a clinically reliable and validated tool for older adults.
Objectives: Lichtenberg et al. reported on the implementation of a 10-item financial decision-making screening scale (Financial Decision Tracker-FDT) in a state-wide Adult Protective Services (APS) project. This study examined which of the seven scored items, reflecting the Appelbaum & Grisso decisional abilities model, were most sensitive to decision-making deficits. Methods: The Financial Decision Tracker was administered to 445 adults aged 60 years of older during APS investigations of financial exploitation. APS workers administered the FDT as part of their financial exploitation investigation. Overall, seven scored FDT items were compared using T tests. Results: Six of the seven risk-scored items were significantly different between those with and without decision-making deficits. Two of the items had small effect sizes, and four items had moderate effect sizes. The larger, moderate effect sizes were related to risk to financial well-being (appreciation), impact on finances (understanding), and who benefits most from the decision (understanding).Conclusions: The main findings of the study supported the Appelbaum and Grisso's decision-making model and the ability of specific items related to understanding and appreciation to differentiate between individuals with and without financial decision-making deficits.Clinical Implications: The FDT is a clinically reliable and validated tool for older adults.
Authors: Patricia A Boyle; Lei Yu; Robert S Wilson; Keith Gamble; Aron S Buchman; David A Bennett Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 3.240