Literature DB >> 28590882

Item response theory analysis of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale.

Jeanne A Teresi1,2,3, Katja Ocepek-Welikson1, Peter A Lichtenberg1.   

Abstract

The focus of these analyses was to examine the psychometric properties of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale (LFDSS). The purpose of the screen was to evaluate the decisional abilities and vulnerability to exploitation of older adults. Adults aged 60 and over were interviewed by social, legal, financial, or health services professionals who underwent in-person training on the administration and scoring of the scale. Professionals provided a rating of the decision-making abilities of the older adult. The analytic sample included 213 individuals with an average age of 76.9 (SD = 10.1). The majority (57%) were female. Data were analyzed using item response theory (IRT) methodology. The results supported the unidimensionality of the item set. Several IRT models were tested. Ten ordinal and binary items evidenced a slightly higher reliability estimate (0.85) than other versions and better coverage in terms of the range of reliable measurement across the continuum of financial incapacity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competency screening; financial abuse; financial decision screening; information; item response theory; reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28590882      PMCID: PMC5608641          DOI: 10.1080/08946566.2017.1338170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Elder Abuse Negl        ISSN: 0894-6566


  6 in total

1.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Informing evidence-based practice: a review of research analyzing adult protective services data.

Authors:  Joy Swanson Ernst; Holly Ramsey-Klawsnik; Jason E Schillerstrom; Carol Dayton; Paula Mixson; Mary Counihan
Journal:  J Elder Abuse Negl       Date:  2014

3.  Standard Error of Ability Estimates and the Classification Accuracy and Consistency of Binary Decisions.

Authors:  Ying Cheng; Cheng Liu; John Behrens
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  A Person-Centered Approach to Financial Capacity Assessment: Preliminary Development of a New Rating Scale.

Authors:  Peter A Lichtenberg; Jonathan Stoltman; Lisa J Ficker; Madelyn Iris; Benjamin Mast
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.619

5.  Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures.

Authors:  J A Teresi; M Kleinman; K Ocepek-Welikson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000 Jun 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; T Grisso
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Methodological approaches to the analyses of elder abuse screening measures: Application of latent variable measurement modeling to the WC-RAPS.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Mildred Ramirez; Joy Solomon; Daniel Reingold
Journal:  J Elder Abuse Negl       Date:  2018-10-22

2.  Which Items of the Financial Decision Tracker Differentiate Those with Decision-making Deficits from Those with No Deficits? Data from the Michigan APS Implementation Project.

Authors:  Peter A Lichtenberg; Maggie Tocco; Rebecca Campbell; Marie Shipp
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.871

3.  Implementing a financial decision-making scale in APS financial exploitation investigations: Use of the PARIHS conceptual framework.

Authors:  Peter A Lichtenberg; Joshua Mandarino; Lisa Fisher; Maggie Tocco; Juno Moray; Marie Shipp
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2022-06-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.