Peter A Lichtenberg1, Evan Gross2, Lisa J Ficker3. 1. Institute of Gerontology & Merrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Professor of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States. 2. Institute of Gerontology & Department of Psychology, Institute of Gerontology, Detroit, MI, United States. 3. Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Abstract
Objectives: This work examines the clinical utility of the scoring system for the Lichtenberg Financial Decision-making Rating Scale (LFDRS) and its usefulness for decision making capacity and financial exploitation. Objective 1 was to examine the clinical utility of a person centered, empirically supported, financial decision making scale. Objective 2 was to determine whether the risk-scoring system created for this rating scale is sufficiently accurate for the use of cutoff scores in cases of decisional capacity and cases of suspected financial exploitation. Objective 3 was to examine whether cognitive decline and decisional impairment predicted suspected financial exploitation. Methods: Two hundred independently living, non-demented community-dwelling older adults comprised the sample. Participants completed the rating scale and other cognitive measures. Results: Receiver operating characteristic curves were in the good to excellent range for decisional capacity scoring, and in the fair to good range for financial exploitation.Conclusions: Analyses supported the conceptual link between decision making deficits and risk for exploitation, and supported the use of the risk-scoring system in a community-based population.Clinical Implications: This study adds to the empirical evidence supporting the use of the rating scale as a clinical tool assessing risk for financial decisional impairment and/or financial exploitation.
Objectives: This work examines the clinical utility of the scoring system for the Lichtenberg Financial Decision-making Rating Scale (LFDRS) and its usefulness for decision making capacity and financial exploitation. Objective 1 was to examine the clinical utility of a person centered, empirically supported, financial decision making scale. Objective 2 was to determine whether the risk-scoring system created for this rating scale is sufficiently accurate for the use of cutoff scores in cases of decisional capacity and cases of suspected financial exploitation. Objective 3 was to examine whether cognitive decline and decisional impairment predicted suspected financial exploitation. Methods: Two hundred independently living, non-demented community-dwelling older adults comprised the sample. Participants completed the rating scale and other cognitive measures. Results: Receiver operating characteristic curves were in the good to excellent range for decisional capacity scoring, and in the fair to good range for financial exploitation.Conclusions: Analyses supported the conceptual link between decision making deficits and risk for exploitation, and supported the use of the risk-scoring system in a community-based population.Clinical Implications: This study adds to the empirical evidence supporting the use of the rating scale as a clinical tool assessing risk for financial decisional impairment and/or financial exploitation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cognitive decline; financial decision making; financial exploitation; person centered
Authors: Peter A Lichtenberg; Jonathan Stoltman; Lisa J Ficker; Madelyn Iris; Benjamin Mast Journal: Clin Gerontol Date: 2015-01-01 Impact factor: 2.619
Authors: LaToya N Hall; Lisa J Ficker; Letha A Chadiha; Carmen R Green; James S Jackson; Peter A Lichtenberg Journal: Gerontol Geriatr Med Date: 2016-11-16
Authors: Peter A Lichtenberg; Wassim Tarraf; Vanessa O Rorai; Matthew Roling; Juno Moray; Evan Z Gross; Patricia A Boyle Journal: Innov Aging Date: 2022-05-26
Authors: Annie L Nguyen; Laura Mosqueda; Nikki Windisch; Gali Weissberger; Jenna Axelrod; S Duke Han Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 4.077