Sarah M Capelouto1, Audrey J Gaskins2, Zsolt Peter Nagy3, Daniel B Shapiro3, Jessica B Spencer4, Heather S Hipp4. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. sarah.capelouto@gmail.com. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. 3. Reproductive Biology Associates, 1100 Johnson Ferry Road, Sandy Springs, GA, 30342, USA. 4. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, 550 Peachtree Street, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Oocyte donor in vitro fertilization (IVF) represents an ideal model to study the effects of embryo stage on reproductive success, as embryos come from young women with high-quality oocytes. Our study aimed to determine if embryo transfer stage affected outcomes in oocyte donor IVF, including the common scenario where only a limited number of quality embryos are available after culture. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analyzed anonymous vitrified donor oocyte cycles at a single clinic between 2008 and 2015. Overall, 983 recipients underwent 1178 warming cycles resulting in fresh transfer of one-to-two embryos. Our primary outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included multiple birth, birthweight, and gestational age. Log binomial regression with cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations were used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) accounting for recipient age, race, and transfer year. RESULTS: Among 132 cleavage and 1046 blastocyst transfer cycles, cleavage transfers were associated with lower probability of live birth (aRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.88). Subgroup analysis focused on cycles with a limited number of quality embryos 3 days post-fertilization (≤2), as clinically these women were most likely to be considered for cleavage transfers. Among these cycles (120 cleavage, 371 blastocyst), cleavage transfers were still associated with lower live birth rates compared to blastocyst (aRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.87) CONCLUSIONS: Even in a donor oocyte model with high-quality oocytes, there was a benefit to extended culture and blastocyst transfer, including when only one-to-two quality embryos were available after early culture. This is possibly owed to improved uterine synchronicity or decreased contractility.
PURPOSE: Oocyte donor in vitro fertilization (IVF) represents an ideal model to study the effects of embryo stage on reproductive success, as embryos come from young women with high-quality oocytes. Our study aimed to determine if embryo transfer stage affected outcomes in oocyte donor IVF, including the common scenario where only a limited number of quality embryos are available after culture. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analyzed anonymous vitrified donor oocyte cycles at a single clinic between 2008 and 2015. Overall, 983 recipients underwent 1178 warming cycles resulting in fresh transfer of one-to-two embryos. Our primary outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included multiple birth, birthweight, and gestational age. Log binomial regression with cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations were used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) accounting for recipient age, race, and transfer year. RESULTS: Among 132 cleavage and 1046 blastocyst transfer cycles, cleavage transfers were associated with lower probability of live birth (aRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.88). Subgroup analysis focused on cycles with a limited number of quality embryos 3 days post-fertilization (≤2), as clinically these women were most likely to be considered for cleavage transfers. Among these cycles (120 cleavage, 371 blastocyst), cleavage transfers were still associated with lower live birth rates compared to blastocyst (aRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.87) CONCLUSIONS: Even in a donor oocyte model with high-quality oocytes, there was a benefit to extended culture and blastocyst transfer, including when only one-to-two quality embryos were available after early culture. This is possibly owed to improved uterine synchronicity or decreased contractility.
Authors: Sarah M Capelouto; Zsolt Peter Nagy; Daniel B Shapiro; Sydney R Archer; Deandrea P Ellis; Alicia K Smith; Jessica B Spencer; Heather S Hipp Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: A L Spangmose; E Ginström Ernstad; S Malchau; J Forman; A Tiitinen; M Gissler; S Opdahl; L B Romundstad; C Bergh; U B Wennerholm; A A Henningsen; A Pinborg Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Zsolt P Nagy; Ching-Chien Chang; Daniel B Shapiro; Diana Patricia Bernal; Carlene W Elsner; Dorothy Mitchell-Leef; Andrew A Toledo; Hilton I Kort Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2008-08-09 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Natalie Porat; Lynn M Boehnlein; Matthew A Barker; Peter Kovacs; Steven R Lindheim Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 1.730