Literature DB >> 24083875

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abha Maheshwari1, Theodoros Kalampokas, Jill Davidson, Siladitya Bhattacharya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of obstetric and perinatal complications in singleton pregnancies after the transfer of blastocyst-stage and cleavage-stage embryos generated through IVF.
DESIGN: Systematic review.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Singleton pregnancies resulting from ET at the blastocyst stage versus those at the cleavage stage. INTERVENTION(S): Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials DARE, and CINAHL (1980-2013) were searched. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the relevant studies using CASP scoring. Risk ratios and risk differences were calculated in Rev Man 5.1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Very preterm birth, preterm birth, small for gestational age, low birth weight, very low birth weight, congenital anomalies, perinatal mortality, preeclampsia, and placenta previa. RESULT(S): In vitro fertilization pregnancies occurring as a result of ET at the blastocyst stage were associated with a higher relative risk (RR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) of preterm (RR 1.27; 95% CI 1.22-1.31) and very preterm delivery (RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.10-1.35) in comparison with those resulting from the transfer of cleavage-stage embryos. The risk of growth restriction was lower in babies conceived through blastocyst transfer (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.77-0.88). CONCLUSION(S): Data from observational studies show that ET at the blastocyst stage is associated with a higher risk of very preterm delivery. However, we were not able to adjust for confounders. Perinatal outcome data from existing randomized trials are needed to determine the safety of ET at the blastocyst stage compared with the cleavage stage.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICSI; IVF; blastocyst; cleavage; obstetric outcomes; perinatal outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24083875     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  29 in total

1.  Initial maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels in pregnancies achieved after assisted reproductive technology are higher after preimplantation genetic screening and after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Elie Hobeika; Sonali Singh; Shaveta Malik; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Supraphysiologic estradiol is an independent predictor of low birth weight in full-term singletons born after fresh embryo transfer.

Authors:  N Pereira; R T Elias; P J Christos; A C Petrini; K Hancock; J P Lekovich; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Preimplantation genetic screening 2.0: the theory.

Authors:  Joep Geraedts; Karen Sermon
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Federico Cirillo; Antonella Smeraldi; Emanuela Morenghi; Giulia E G Mulazzani; Elena Albani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Birthweight of singletons born after blastocyst-stage or cleavage-stage transfer: analysis of a data set from three randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Anick De Vos; Samuel Dos Santos-Ribeiro; Herman Tournaye; Greta Verheyen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The role of angiogenic markers in adverse perinatal outcomes: fresh versus frozen embryo transfers.

Authors:  Irene Woo; Yen Chan; Intira Sriprasert; Kristin Louie; Sue Ingles; Frank Stanczyk; Lynda K McGinnis; Karine Chung
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Can the peak E2/follicle ratio be a quantitative indicator of pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproductive cycles? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Dan Hu; Xiyuan Dong; Min Xiong; Ting Xiong; Bo Huang; Dan Zeng; Jihui Ai; Hanwang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

8.  Building a model to increase live birth rate through patient-specific optimization of embryo transfer day.

Authors:  R H Goldman; D J Kaser; S A Missmer; S S Srouji; L V Farland; C Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Comparative intrauterine development and placental function of ART concepti: implications for human reproductive medicine and animal breeding.

Authors:  Enrrico Bloise; Sky K Feuer; Paolo F Rinaudo
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Systematic assessment of the performance of whole-genome amplification for SNP/CNV detection and β-thalassemia genotyping.

Authors:  Fei He; Wanjun Zhou; Ren Cai; Tizhen Yan; Xiangmin Xu
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.