Literature DB >> 19939832

Racial disparity in oocyte donation outcome: a multiethnic, matched cohort study.

Daniel Bodri1, Juan José Guillén, Marta López, Valérie Vernaeve, Oriol Coll.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Race and ethnicity are one of the newly investigated patient-related prognostic factors that might affect the outcome of assisted reproduction techniques. To our knowledge no data currently are available on the effect of race on oocyte donation outcome. MATERIALS: A retrospective, matched cohort study was performed in a private infertility centre evaluating 1012 Black, South-East Asian and Caucasian recipients undergoing their first oocyte donation cycles.
RESULTS: A significantly lower ongoing pregnancy rate (24.6 versus 36.8%, OR: 0.56 95% CI: 0.40-0.77, P = 0.01) was observed among Black recipients compared with their matched Caucasian counterparts. The prevalence of uterine fibroids (49.6 versus 17.1%, P < 0.0001) and previous history of tubal infertility (53.2 versus 16.5%, P < 0.0001) was significantly higher among Black women. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that, after adjusting for confounding variables, Black race was an independent risk factor for not achieving an ongoing pregnancy (for ongoing pregnancy, adjusted OR: 0.62 95% CI: 0.43-0.89, P = 0.009). Ongoing pregnancy rate (37.2 versus 37.2%, OR: 1.0 95% CI: 0.49-2.04, P = 1.0) was not significantly different between South-East Asian and matched Caucasian patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Black race was an independent risk factor for not achieving an ongoing pregnancy after oocyte donation. Although yellow race does not seem to adversely affect oocyte donation, larger studies are still warranted to draw more solid conclusions. Race should be considered as an independent prognostic factor in oocyte donation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19939832     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Ethnicity and assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Alicia Armstrong; Torie C Plowden
Journal:  Clin Pract (Lond)       Date:  2012-11-01

Review 2.  IVF outcomes in obese donor oocyte recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E S Jungheim; S B Schon; M B Schulte; D A DeUgarte; S A Fowler; M G Tuuli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  When using donor oocytes, does embryo stage matter? An analysis of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfers using a cryopreserved donor oocyte bank.

Authors:  Sarah M Capelouto; Audrey J Gaskins; Zsolt Peter Nagy; Daniel B Shapiro; Jessica B Spencer; Heather S Hipp
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Effect of ethnicity on live birth rates after in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment.

Authors:  K Jayaprakasan; D Pandian; J Hopkisson; B K Campbell; W E Maalouf
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Lower endometrial receptivity in HIV-infected women receiving oocyte donation: a comorbidity of HIV infection?

Authors:  Daniel Mataró; Désirée García; Oriol Coll; Rita Vassena; Amelia Rodríguez
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2017-11-01

6.  The effect of donor and recipient race on outcomes of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Yijun Liu; Heather S Hipp; Zsolt P Nagy; Sarah M Capelouto; Daniel B Shapiro; Jessica B Spencer; Audrey J Gaskins
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The effects of oocyte donor and recipient body mass index on live birth rates and pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Jiaxin Xu; Heather S Hipp; Sarah M Capelouto; Zsolt P Nagy; Daniel B Shapiro; Jessica B Spencer; Audrey J Gaskins
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-10-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.