Literature DB >> 20682007

How zooplankton feed: mechanisms, traits and trade-offs.

Thomas Kiørboe1.   

Abstract

Zooplankton is a morphologically and taxonomically diverse group and includes organisms that vary in size by many orders of magnitude, but they are all faced with the common problem of collecting food from a very dilute suspension. In order to maintain a viable population in the face of mortality, zooplankton in the ocean have to clear daily a volume of ambient water for prey particles that is equivalent to about 10(6) times their own body volume. While most size-specific vital rates and mortality rates decline with size, the clearance requirement is largely size-independent because food availability also declines with size. There is a limited number of solutions to the problem of concentrating dilute prey from a sticky medium: passive and active ambush feeding; feeding-current feeding, where the prey is either intercepted directly, retained on a filter, or individually perceived and extracted from the feeding current; cruise feeding; and colonization of large particles and marine snow aggregates. The basic mechanics of these food-collection mechanisms are described, and it is shown that their efficiencies are inherently different and that each of these mechanisms becomes less efficient with increasing size. Mechanisms that compensate for this decline in efficiency are described, including inflation of feeding structures and development of vision. Each feeding mode has implications beyond feeding in terms of risk of encountering predators and chance of meeting mates, and they partly target different types of prey. The main dichotomy is between (inefficient) ambush feeding on motile prey and the more efficient active feeding modes; a secondary dichotomy is between (efficient) hovering and (less efficient) cruising feeding modes. The efficiencies of the various feeding modes are traded off against feeding-mode-dependent metabolic expenses, predation risks, and mating chances. The optimality of feeding strategies, evaluated as the ratio of gain over risk, varies with the environment, and may explain both size-dependent and spatio-temporal differences in distributions of various feeding types as well as other aspects of the biology of zooplankton (mating behaviour, predator defence strategies).
© 2010 The Author. Biological Reviews © 2010 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20682007     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00148.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  55 in total

1.  Prey detection in a cruising copepod.

Authors:  Sanne Kjellerup; Thomas Kiørboe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Danger of zooplankton feeding: the fluid signal generated by ambush-feeding copepods.

Authors:  Thomas Kiørboe; Houshuo Jiang; Sean P Colin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Size structures sensory hierarchy in ocean life.

Authors:  Erik A Martens; Navish Wadhwa; Nis S Jacobsen; Christian Lindemann; Ken H Andersen; André Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Cascading effects in freshwater microbial food webs by predatory Cercozoa, Katablepharidacea and ciliates feeding on aplastidic bacterivorous cryptophytes.

Authors:  Karel Šimek; Vesna Grujčić; Indranil Mukherjee; Vojtěch Kasalický; Jiří Nedoma; Thomas Posch; Maliheh Mehrshad; Michaela M Salcher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.194

5.  Feeding currents facilitate a mixotrophic way of life.

Authors:  Lasse T Nielsen; Thomas Kiørboe
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Hydrodynamic functionality of the lorica in choanoflagellates.

Authors:  Seyed Saeed Asadzadeh; Lasse Tor Nielsen; Anders Andersen; Julia Dölger; Thomas Kiørboe; Poul S Larsen; Jens H Walther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  The global susceptibility of coastal forage fish to competition by large jellyfish.

Authors:  Nicolas Azaña Schnedler-Meyer; Patrizio Mariani; Thomas Kiørboe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  To eat and not be eaten: optimal foraging behaviour in suspension feeding copepods.

Authors:  Thomas Kiørboe; Houshuo Jiang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Hydrodynamics of microbial filter feeding.

Authors:  Lasse Tor Nielsen; Seyed Saeed Asadzadeh; Julia Dölger; Jens H Walther; Thomas Kiørboe; Anders Andersen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Mammoth grazers on the ocean's minuteness: a review of selective feeding using mucous meshes.

Authors:  Keats R Conley; Fabien Lombard; Kelly R Sutherland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.