Literature DB >> 33813663

Fracture liaison service model: treatment persistence 5 years later.

Antonio Naranjo1,2, Amparo Molina3, Adrián Quevedo3, Francisco J Rubiño3, Fernando Sánchez-Alonso4, Carlos Rodríguez-Lozano3, Soledad Ojeda3.   

Abstract

We analyzed the long-term persistence of treatment in a FLS. During follow-up, 15.2% of patients had a refracture and 23.8% died. At the 5-year checkup, 74% had started treatment (associated with female sex, previous use of bisphosphonate, and referral to an osteoporosis clinic). Persistence at 1 and 5 years was 70.6% and 46.5%, respectively.
INTRODUCTION: To analyze the long-term persistence of treatment in a fracture liaison service (FLS).
METHODS: Patients ≥ 50 years with a fragility fracture attended between 2012 and 2016 who were recommended for treatment to prevent new fractures were included. Baseline data included demographics, type of fracture, previous treatment, and FRAX® items. Five years later, patient records were reviewed and the following data were collected: [1] survival; [2] refracture; [3] initiation of treatment, persistence, and medication possession ratio (MPR) > 80%.
RESULTS: We included 888 patients, mean age 75 years, 83% women, and mean follow-up 56 months. During follow-up, 135 patients (15.2%) had a refracture (109 major fractures, 50 hip refractures) and 212 patients died (23.8%); at the 5-year checkup, 657 patients (74%) had started some type of treatment. Factors associated with the start of treatment were female sex (OR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.42-3.11), previous use of bisphosphonate (OR 3.91; 95% CI: 2.23-6.86), and referral to an osteoporosis clinic (OR 1.46; 95% CI: 1.02-2.07). Persistence decreased from 70.6% at 12 months to 46.5% at 60 months. An MPR > 80% was confirmed in 449 patients, 68.3% of whom were under treatment. A total of 521 and 447 patients received treatment for at least 24 and 36 months, respectively (79.3% and 68.0% of those who started treatment).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with fragility fractures attended at an FLS showed optimal long-term persistence of treatment. These data can help healthcare managers better calculate the cost-effectiveness of implementing the FLS model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Bisphosphonate; Fracture; Fracture liaison service; Osteoporosis; Persistence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33813663     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00925-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  17 in total

1.  One and two-year persistence with different anti-osteoporosis medications: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  C Reyes; C Tebe; D Martinez-Laguna; M S Ali; A Soria-Castro; C Carbonell; D Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Two-year adherence to treatment and associated factors in a fracture liaison service in Spain.

Authors:  A Naranjo; S Ojeda-Bruno; A Bilbao-Cantarero; J C Quevedo-Abeledo; B V Diaz-González; C Rodríguez-Lozano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Preventing future fractures: effectiveness of an orthogeriatric fracture liaison service compared to an outpatient fracture liaison service and the standard management in patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  Antonio Naranjo; Sonia Fernández-Conde; Soledad Ojeda; Laura Torres-Hernández; Carolina Hernández-Carballo; Idoia Bernardos; Sinforiano Rodríguez; Pedro Laynez
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Patients discharged from a fracture liaison service still require follow-up and bone health advice.

Authors:  Nicholas Hui; Sandra Fraser; Peter K K Wong
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Dropping the Ball and Falling Off the Care Wagon. Factors Correlating With Nonadherence to Secondary Fracture Prevention Programs.

Authors:  Manju Chandran; Mcvin Cheen; Hao Ying; Tang Ching Lau; Matthew Tan
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chih-Hsing Wu; Shih-Te Tu; Yin-Fan Chang; Ding-Cheng Chan; Jui-Teng Chien; Chih-Hsueh Lin; Sonal Singh; Manikanta Dasari; Jung-Fu Chen; Keh-Sung Tsai
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Results of a model of secondary prevention for osteoporotic fracture coordinated by rheumatology and focused on the nurse and primary care physicians.

Authors:  Antonio Naranjo; Soledad Ojeda-Bruno; Ana Bilbao Cantarero; Juan Carlos Quevedo Abeledo; Luis Alberto Henríquez-Hernández; Carlos Rodríguez-Lozano
Journal:  Reumatol Clin       Date:  2014-02-17

8.  Persistence and compliance to osteoporosis therapy in a fracture liaison service: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andréa Senay; Julio C Fernandes; Josée Delisle; Suzanne N Morin; Sylvie Perreault
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Implementation of a fracture liaison service and its effects on osteoporosis treatment adherence and secondary fracture at a tertiary care academic health system.

Authors:  Donald J Scholten; Jeremy K Bray; Kevin Y Wang; Anne F Lake; Cynthia L Emory
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Time to benefit and the long-term persistence of new users of oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Kevin J Friesen; Shawn Bugden; Jamie Falk
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain.

Authors:  Antonio Naranjo; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Julián Sánchez-Martín; Alejandro Pérez-Mitru; Max Brosa
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-04-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.