Literature DB >> 26209018

Dropping the Ball and Falling Off the Care Wagon. Factors Correlating With Nonadherence to Secondary Fracture Prevention Programs.

Manju Chandran1, Mcvin Cheen2, Hao Ying3, Tang Ching Lau4, Matthew Tan5.   

Abstract

Health care systems and hospitals in several countries have implemented Fracture Liaison Services (FLSs). Success rates of FLSs with regard to osteoporosis assessment and treatment, fracture reduction, and adherence to osteoporosis medications have been reported by several groups including ours. A significant drop-out rate among patients in these programs may occur. This has not been evaluated before. We explored the factors correlating with nonadherence among a multiethnic population of patients in the FLS at our institution, the largest tertiary teaching hospital in South East Asia. Our secondary objective was to explore whether patients who defaulted follow-up visits continued to be compliant with medications. A retrospective analysis of our FLS's computerized database was performed. Of 938 patients followed up more than 2 years, 237 defaulted at various time points. A significant percentage of patients who dropped out of the program opined that it was because the follow-up visits were too time consuming. Non-Chinese patients were more likely than Chinese (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.98, 1.33-2.94), patients with primary school education and below were more likely than those with secondary school and above education (aHR = 1.65, 1.11-2.45) and those with nonvertebral and/or multiple fractures were more likely than those with spine fractures (aHR = 1.38, 1.06-1.81) to be nonadherent. A fraction of patients who defaulted continued to fill osteoporosis medication prescriptions. Median medication possession ratio among the patients who defaulted was 12.3% (interquartile range: 4.1%-36.7%) at 2 years. Persistence ranged from 15.1% to 20.8% and from 1.9% to 7.5% at 1 and 2 years, respectively after defaulting from the program. Our study, which to the best of our knowledge is the first of its kind, provides insight into the factors correlating with nonadherence to FLSs. Knowledge of the challenges faced by patients may be of help to health care providers interested in developing FLSs.
Copyright © 2016 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Fracture Liaison Service; fragility fracture; health service research; secondary fracture prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26209018     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  6 in total

1.  Adherence to fracture liaison service programs in patients over 70: the hidden part of the iceberg.

Authors:  B Mugnier; A Daumas; S Doddoli; S Belmeliani; A-L Couderc; B Mizzi; P Lévêque; P Villani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Long-term persistence of treatment after hip fracture in a fracture liaison service.

Authors:  Antonio Naranjo; Amparo Molina; Adrián Quevedo; Francisco J Rubiño; Fernando Sánchez-Alonso; Carlos Rodríguez-Lozano; Soledad Ojeda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Asia Pacific: an educational initiative.

Authors:  P R Ebeling; D-C Chan; T C Lau; J K Lee; T Songpatanasilp; S H Wong; F L Hew; R Sethi; M Williams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Assessing the knowledge, attitude and practice of osteoporosis among Singaporean women aged 65 years and above at two SingHealth polyclinics.

Authors:  Dypti Lulla; Chiang Wen Teo; XiaoYou Shen; Zhi Bing Julian Loi; Khai Wen Quek; Hosanna Liha Anak Lis; Sheila Anthony Koh; Eric Tao Chan; Sarah Woon Ching Lim; Lian Leng Low
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Fracture liaison service model: treatment persistence 5 years later.

Authors:  Antonio Naranjo; Amparo Molina; Adrián Quevedo; Francisco J Rubiño; Fernando Sánchez-Alonso; Carlos Rodríguez-Lozano; Soledad Ojeda
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network.

Authors:  M K Javaid; A Sami; W Lems; P Mitchell; T Thomas; A Singer; R Speerin; M Fujita; D D Pierroz; K Akesson; P Halbout; S Ferrari; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.