Literature DB >> 24553244

Results of a model of secondary prevention for osteoporotic fracture coordinated by rheumatology and focused on the nurse and primary care physicians.

Antonio Naranjo1, Soledad Ojeda-Bruno2, Ana Bilbao Cantarero2, Juan Carlos Quevedo Abeledo2, Luis Alberto Henríquez-Hernández3, Carlos Rodríguez-Lozano2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of the implementation of a program for secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures on prescribing bisphosphonates and persistent short-term treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients >50 years with fragility fracture attended in the emergency department were enrolled in an observational study. The program consisted of: 1) training of primary care physicians, 2) baseline visit: questionnaire on osteoporosis, bone densitometry and patient education, 3) patient referral to primary care, except those with multiple fractures or requiring special study or therapy, who were referred to a specialist, and 4) follow-up by checking prescriptions in electronic records, and a telephone survey. The outcome variable was the percentage of patients who, on having been prescribed bisphosphonates, still adhered to the treatment at 3 months.
RESULTS: Of the 532 patients with inclusion criteria, 202 (39%) refused to participate. Those who refused to take part had a higher mean age (P<.01) and a higher frequency of hip fracture (P<.01) compared with patients who did participate. A total of 330 patients were included for intervention, with a mean age of 71 years, and 254(77%) were female. An antiresorptive was being used by 45 patients (13%) at baseline. After the baseline visit 223 patients (67%) were recommended a bisphosphonate. In the follow-up at 3 months 78% of patients who had been prescribed bisphosphonate were still receiving treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: We present a multidisciplinary program for secondary prevention of fractures coordinated by rheumatology in which the number of patients who were receiving bisphosphonate at 3 months increased by four times compared to baseline visit.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alendronate; Bisfosfonatos; Bisphosphonates; Fractura por fragilidad; Fragility fracture; Osteoporosis; Prevención secundaria; Secondary prevention; Training program

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24553244     DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2013.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reumatol Clin        ISSN: 1699-258X


  10 in total

1.  Two-year adherence to treatment and associated factors in a fracture liaison service in Spain.

Authors:  A Naranjo; S Ojeda-Bruno; A Bilbao-Cantarero; J C Quevedo-Abeledo; B V Diaz-González; C Rodríguez-Lozano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Meeting international standards of secondary fracture prevention: a survey on Fracture Liaison Services in the Netherlands.

Authors:  P van den Berg; D H Schweitzer; P M M van Haard; J P van den Bergh; P P Geusens
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Implications of FRAX® adjusted for recent fracture on the indication of treatment in an FLS.

Authors:  Antonio Naranjo; Amparo Molina; Carlos Rodríguez-Lozano; Rubén López; Sonia Fuentes; Soledad Ojeda
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 2.879

4.  Long-term persistence of treatment after hip fracture in a fracture liaison service.

Authors:  Antonio Naranjo; Amparo Molina; Adrián Quevedo; Francisco J Rubiño; Fernando Sánchez-Alonso; Carlos Rodríguez-Lozano; Soledad Ojeda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Fracture liaison service model: treatment persistence 5 years later.

Authors:  Antonio Naranjo; Amparo Molina; Adrián Quevedo; Francisco J Rubiño; Fernando Sánchez-Alonso; Carlos Rodríguez-Lozano; Soledad Ojeda
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 6.  The Phenotype of Patients with a Recent Fracture: A Literature Survey of the Fracture Liaison Service.

Authors:  Lisanne Vranken; Caroline E Wyers; Joop P W van den Bergh; Piet P M M Geusens
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Comorbidities and medication use in patients with a recent clinical fracture at the Fracture Liaison Service.

Authors:  L Vranken; C E Wyers; R Y Van der Velde; H M Janzing; S Kaarsemaker; P P Geusens; J P Van den Bergh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Multidisciplinary expert consensus on secondary fracture prevention in Spain.

Authors:  E Casado; J Blanch; C Carbonell; J C Bastida; J L Pérez-Castrillón; L Canals; L Lizán
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain.

Authors:  Antonio Naranjo; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Julián Sánchez-Martín; Alejandro Pérez-Mitru; Max Brosa
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-04-22

10.  Best Practice Framework of Fracture Liaison Services in Spain and their coordination with Primary Care.

Authors:  A Naranjo; S Ojeda; M Giner; M Balcells-Oliver; L Canals; J M Cancio; E Duaso; J Mora-Fernández; C Pablos; A González; B Lladó; F J Olmo; M J Montoya; A Menéndez; D Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.617

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.