Literature DB >> 33807826

Occult Disco-Ligamentous Lesions of the Subaxial c-Spine-A Comparison of Preoperative Imaging Findings and Intraoperative Site Inspection.

Insa Janssen1,2, Nico Sollmann3,4,5, Melanie Barz2, Thomas Baum3, Karl Schaller1, Claus Zimmer3,4, Yu-Mi Ryang2,6, Jan S Kirschke3,4, Bernhard Meyer2.   

Abstract

Despite the general acceptance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the gold standard for diagnostics of traumatic disco-ligamentous injuries in the subaxial cervical spine, clinical experience shows cases where no lesion is detected in MRI exams but obtained during surgery. The aim of this study was to compare intraoperative site inspection to preoperative imaging findings and to identify radiological features of patients having a risk for under- or over-estimating disco-ligamentous lesions. We performed a retrospective analysis of our clinical database, considering all patients who underwent surgical treatment of the cervical spine via an anterior approach after trauma between June 2008 and April 2018. Only patients with availability of immediate preoperative computed tomography (CT), 3-Tesla MRI scans, and information about intraoperative findings were considered. Results of preoperative imaging were set in context to intraoperative findings, and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) were calculated. Out of 144 patients receiving anterior cervical surgery after trauma, 83 patients (mean age: 59.4 ± 20.5 years, age range: 12-94 years, 63.9% males) were included in this study. Included patients underwent surgical treatment via anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF; 79 patients) or anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (4 patients) with ventral plating. Comparing preoperative imaging findings to intraoperative site inspection, a discrepancy between imaging and surgical findings was revealed in 14 patients, leading to an overall specificity/sensitivity of preoperative imaging to identify disco-ligamentous lesions of the cervical spine of 100%/77.4%. Yet, adding the existence of prevertebral hematoma and/or vertebral fractures according to preoperative imaging improved the sensitivity to 95.2%. Lack of sensitivity was most likely related to severe cervical spondylosis, rendering correct radiological reporting difficult. Thus, the risk of missing a traumatic disco-ligamentous injury of the cervical spine in imaging seems to be a particular threat in patients with preexisting degenerative cervical spondylosis. In conclusion, incorporating the existence of prevertebral hematoma and/or vertebral fractures can significantly improve diagnostic yield.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical spine trauma; computed tomography; degenerative cervical spondylosis; disco-ligamentous injuries; intervertebral disc; magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2021        PMID: 33807826      PMCID: PMC7998602          DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4418


  35 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical ligaments in the absence of trauma.

Authors:  Asif Saifuddin; Ruth Green; John White
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Dixon techniques for water and fat imaging.

Authors:  Jingfei Ma
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Basic principles of management for cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  J K O'Dowd
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Radiological protocol in spinal trauma: literature review and Spinal Cord Society position statement.

Authors:  P K Karthik Yelamarthy; H S Chhabra; Vedant Vaksha; Yatish Agarwal; Anita Agarwal; Kalidutta Das; Hans Joseph Erli; Mihir Bapat; Roop Singh; Darshan Gautam; Rushama Tandon; G Balamurali; Sriram Rajan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Simple proton spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  W T Dixon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls.

Authors:  E M Delfaut; J Beltran; G Johnson; J Rousseau; X Marchandise; A Cotten
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  Subaxial cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  Eric Feuchtbaum; Jacob Buchowski; Lukas Zebala
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

8.  Efficacy of MRI for assessment of spinal trauma: correlation with intraoperative findings.

Authors:  Wu Zhuge; Peleg Ben-Galim; John A Hipp; Charles A Reitman
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-05

9.  Traumatic cervical discoligamentous injuries: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and operative findings.

Authors:  Gregory M Malham; Helen M Ackland; Dinesh K Varma; Owen D Williamson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Spinal clearance in the difficult trauma patient: a role for screening MRI of the spine.

Authors:  John M Adams; Mark I E Cockburn; Louis T Difazio; Felix A Garcia; Brian K Siegel; Jaroslaw W Bilaniuk
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  3 in total

1.  Editorial on Special Issue "Spine Imaging: Novel Image Acquisition Techniques and Analysis Tools".

Authors:  Nico Sollmann; Thomas Baum
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Clinical algorithm for preventing missed diagnoses of occult cervical spine instability after acute trauma: A case report.

Authors:  Ce Zhu; Hui-Liang Yang; Gi Hye Im; Li-Min Liu; Chun-Guang Zhou; Yue-Ming Song
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Incidence of discoligamentous injuries in patients with acute central cord syndrome and underlying degenerative cervical spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Melanie Barz; Insa K Janssen; Kaywan Aftahy; Sandro M Krieg; Jens Gempt; Chiara Negwer; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-03-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.