STUDY DESIGN: Observational diagnostic study on consecutive patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting spinal soft tissue injury after acute trauma using intraoperative findings as a reference standard. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recognizing injuries to spinal soft tissue structures is critical for proper decision making and management for blunt trauma victims. Although MRI is considered the gold standard for imaging of soft tissues, its ability to identify specific components of soft tissue damage in acute spine trauma patients is poorly documented and controversial. METHODS: Intraoperative findings were recorded for 21 acute spinal trauma patients (study group) and 14 nontraumatic spinal surgery patients (control group). Preoperative MRI's were evaluated randomly and blindly by 2 neuroradiologists. MRI and intraoperative findings were compared. By using the intraoperative findings as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of MRI in detecting spinal soft tissue injury were determined. RESULTS: MRI was 100% sensitive and specific in detecting injury to the anterior longitudinal ligament. MRI was moderately sensitive (80%) but highly specific (100%) for injury to the posterior longitudinal ligament. In contrast, MRI was highly sensitive but less specific in detecting injury to paraspinal muscles (100%, 77%), intervertebral disk (100%, 71%), and interspinous ligament (100%, 64%). MRI was moderately sensitive and specific in detecting ligamentum flavum injury (80% and 86.7%) but poorly sensitive for facet capsule injury (62.5%). CONCLUSIONS: MRI demonstrated high sensitivity for spinal soft tissue injuries. However, MRI showed a definite trend to overestimate interspinous ligament, intervertebral disk, and paraspinal muscle injuries. On the basis of these results, we would consider MRI to be a useful tool for spine clearance after trauma. Conversely, caution should be applied when using MRI for operative decision making due to its less predictable specificity.
STUDY DESIGN: Observational diagnostic study on consecutive patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting spinal soft tissue injury after acute trauma using intraoperative findings as a reference standard. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recognizing injuries to spinal soft tissue structures is critical for proper decision making and management for blunt trauma victims. Although MRI is considered the gold standard for imaging of soft tissues, its ability to identify specific components of soft tissue damage in acute spine traumapatients is poorly documented and controversial. METHODS: Intraoperative findings were recorded for 21 acute spinal traumapatients (study group) and 14 nontraumatic spinal surgery patients (control group). Preoperative MRI's were evaluated randomly and blindly by 2 neuroradiologists. MRI and intraoperative findings were compared. By using the intraoperative findings as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of MRI in detecting spinal soft tissue injury were determined. RESULTS: MRI was 100% sensitive and specific in detecting injury to the anterior longitudinal ligament. MRI was moderately sensitive (80%) but highly specific (100%) for injury to the posterior longitudinal ligament. In contrast, MRI was highly sensitive but less specific in detecting injury to paraspinal muscles (100%, 77%), intervertebral disk (100%, 71%), and interspinous ligament (100%, 64%). MRI was moderately sensitive and specific in detecting ligamentum flavum injury (80% and 86.7%) but poorly sensitive for facet capsule injury (62.5%). CONCLUSIONS: MRI demonstrated high sensitivity for spinal soft tissue injuries. However, MRI showed a definite trend to overestimate interspinous ligament, intervertebral disk, and paraspinal muscle injuries. On the basis of these results, we would consider MRI to be a useful tool for spine clearance after trauma. Conversely, caution should be applied when using MRI for operative decision making due to its less predictable specificity.
Authors: Tariq M Wani; Mahmood Rafiq; Arif Nazir; Hatem A Azzam; Usama Al Zuraigi; Joseph D Tobias Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Insa Janssen; Nico Sollmann; Melanie Barz; Thomas Baum; Karl Schaller; Claus Zimmer; Yu-Mi Ryang; Jan S Kirschke; Bernhard Meyer Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-03-05