| Literature DB >> 33807301 |
Mahboubeh Nabavinia1, Baishali Kanjilal2, Noahiro Fujinuma1, Amos Mugweru3, Iman Noshadi1,2.
Abstract
To address the issue of global warming and climate change issues, recent research efforts have highlighted opportunities for capturing and electrochemically converting carbon dioxide (CO2). Despite metal doped polymers receiving widespread attention in this respect, the structures hitherto reported lack in ease of synthesis with scale up feasibility. In this study, a series of mesoporous metal-doped polymers (MRFs) with tunable metal functionality and hierarchical porosity were successfully synthesized using a one-step copolymerization of resorcinol and formaldehyde with Polyethyleneimine (PEI) under solvothermal conditions. The effect of PEI and metal doping concentrations were observed on physical properties and adsorption results. The results confirmed the role of PEI on the mesoporosity of the polymer networks and high surface area in addition to enhanced CO2 capture capacity. The resulting Cobalt doped material shows excellent thermal stability and promising CO2 capture performance, with equilibrium adsorption of 2.3 mmol CO2/g at 0 °C and 1 bar for at a surface area 675.62 m2/g. This mesoporous polymer, with its ease of synthesis is a promising candidate for promising for CO2 capture and possible subsequent electrochemical conversion.Entities:
Keywords: capture; carbon dioxide; cobalt; mesoporous polymer; nickel
Year: 2021 PMID: 33807301 PMCID: PMC8037370 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26071962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Elemental analysis of various catalyst compositions (all figures in %weight).
| Sample | Carbon | Oxygen | Nitrogen | Cobalt | Nickel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF | 62.6 | 31.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| M-RF | 77.6 | 20.1 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 |
| H-RF | 60.7 | 28.9 | 10.4 | 0 | 0 |
| Co1-M-RF | 60.9 | 31.3 | 7.4 | 0.4 | 0 |
| Co3-M-RF | 51.9 | 37.8 | 9.0 | 1.3 | 0 |
| Ni3-M-RF | 73.2 | 23.4 | 2.7 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Co5-M-RF | 54.67 | 37.12 | 5.42 | 2.79 | 0 |
| Co3-H-RF | 63.9 | 33.3 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0 |
Figure 1FTIR spectra (a) RF resin (b) Mesoporous catalyst without metal centers (c) MRF with 3%Co (Co2-M-RF) (d) MRF with Ni (Ni3-M-RF), Thermogravimetric Analysis (e) RF and MRF without metal centers (f) MRF with progressively increasing Co content (g) Comparison of MRF with MRF-3% Co and MRF with Ni.
Figure 2N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of (a) RF with varying PEI concentration (0%, 1.96% and 3.98% by weight), (b) MRFs with varying cobalt concentrations (0%, 1%, 3% and 5% Co (III) acetylacetonate by weight, (c) Cobalt doped RF made with varying PEI (1.96% and 3.98%) and Cobalt concentration (0%, 3% and 5% Co(III) acetylacetonate by weight), and (d) Metal -doped M-RF with 3% Co (III) acetylacetonate by weight and 3% Ni(II) acetylacetonate by weight.
Surface area and pore size distributions of various catalyst based on BJH model. (Standard deviation was within (±3–4%) of the average values).
| Sample | BET Data | Mesoporous Based on BJH Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface Area (m2/g) | Surface Area (m2/g) | Pore Volume (cm3/g) | Pore Size Radius (nm) | |
| RF | 19.67 | 13.53 | 0.041 | |
| M-RF | 325.99 | 207.01 | 0.35 | 1.62 |
| H-RF | 212.13 | 80.07 | 0.34 | 2.39 |
| Co1-M-RF | 220.12 | 108.11 | 1.14 | 1.99 |
| Co3-RF | 149.80 | 149.80 | 0.25 | 1.89 |
| Co3-M-RF | 977.11 | 226.09 | 1.83 | |
| Co3-H-RF | 342.22 | 123.29 | 0.15 | |
| Co5-M-RF | 375.19 | 98.73 | 0.71 | 1.53 |
| Ni3-M-RF | 264.82 | 87.08 | 0.20 | 1.69 |
Figure 3SEM of various samples: (a) RF (b) M-RF (c) Co1-M-RF (d) Co3-M-RF (e) Co5-M-RF(f) Co3-H-RF (g) H-RF (h) Ni3-RF.
Figure 4Carbon dioxide adsorption of various composition (a) at 0 °C, vs. P/P0 (b). CO2 adsorption at 0 °C vs. PEI % weight in MRF (c) CO2 adsorption at 0 °C vs. Surface area (d) Carbon absorption at 25 °C vs. P/P0 (e) CO2 adsorption at 25 °C vs. PEI % weight in MRF (f) CO2 adsorption at 25 °C vs. Surface area.