| Literature DB >> 33805952 |
Chiara Volani1, Johannes Rainer1, Vinicius Veri Hernandes1, Viviana Meraviglia1, Peter Paul Pramstaller1, Sigurður Vidir Smárason1, Giulio Pompilio2,3, Michela Casella4,5,6, Elena Sommariva2, Giuseppe Paglia7, Alessandra Rossini1.
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a genetic-based cardiac disease accompanied by severe ventricular arrhythmias and a progressive substitution of the myocardium with fibro-fatty tissue. ACM is often associated with sudden cardiac death. Due to the reduced penetrance and variable expressivity, the presence of a genetic defect is not conclusive, thus complicating the diagnosis of ACM. Recent studies on human induced pluripotent stem cells-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) obtained from ACM individuals showed a dysregulated metabolic status, leading to the hypothesis that ACM pathology is characterized by an impairment in the energy metabolism. However, despite efforts having been made for the identification of ACM specific biomarkers, there is still a substantial lack of information regarding the whole metabolomic profile of ACM patients. The aim of the present study was to investigate the metabolic profiles of ACM patients compared to healthy controls (CTRLs). The targeted Biocrates AbsoluteIDQ® p180 assay was used on plasma samples. Our analysis showed that ACM patients have a different metabolome compared to CTRLs, and that the pathways mainly affected include tryptophan metabolism, arginine and proline metabolism and beta oxidation of fatty acids. Altogether, our data indicated that the plasma metabolomes of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy patients show signs of endothelium damage and impaired nitric oxide (NO), fat, and energy metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: ACM; asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA); biocrates; metabolomics; nitric oxide (NO)
Year: 2021 PMID: 33805952 PMCID: PMC8064316 DOI: 10.3390/metabo11040195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Demographic and clinical characteristics of enrolled subjects. ACM, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; RV, right ventricle; LV, left ventricle; EF, ejection fraction; VT, ventricular tachycardia. Data are reported as percentages (%) or mean ± standard deviation (SD).
| ACM Patients ( | CTRL ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex (%; | 88.89% ( | 74.07% ( | 0.18 (Fisher’s exact test) |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 45.31 ± 13.29 | 46.04 ± 14.19 | 0.83 (Student |
| Obesity (%; | 5.56% ( | 0.04% ( | 1.00 (Fisher’s exact test) |
| Athletic lifestyle (%; | 36.11% ( | 36.36% ( | 1.00 (Fisher’s exact test) |
| RV EF % (mean ± SD) | 44.43% ± 7.79 | ND | |
| LV EF % (mean ± SD) | 54.63% ± 13.64 | ND | |
| VT at presentation (%; | 63.89% ( | ND |
Figure 1(a) Principal component analysis of plasma metabolites shows that ACM (red squares) clusters from CTRL (purple dots) samples (b) Enrichment analysis highlights the main pathways affected in ACM samples.
Figure 2Volcano plots showing for each analyte the extent of differential abundance (log2 fold change) on the x-axis against its significance on the y-axis. (a) Results for individual metabolites, (b) results for metabolite sums and ratios. The blue dots indicate significant metabolites and metabolite sums/ratios. The name of some relevant metabolites is also fully reported. Alpha-AAA: alpha-aminoadipic acid; C3: carnitine C3; Trp: tryptophan; ADMA: asymmetric dimethylarginine; SDMA: symmetric dimethylarginine; Arg: arginine.
List of the significant metabolites and ratios. The table shows the analyte name, the log2 fold change and the p-value adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing. Analytes were sorted by the difference in abundance.
| Name | Log2 Fold Change |
|
|---|---|---|
| alpha-AAA | −2.2817718 | 0.00599521 |
| PC aa C32:2 | −0.5926965 | 0.01416184 |
| lysoPC a C18:2 | −0.5736359 | 0.00817355 |
| PC aa C34:4 | −0.519949 | 0.01416184 |
| PC aa C36:6 | −0.4945815 | 0.01972115 |
| C3 | −0.436115 | 0.02721582 |
| PC ae C34:3 | −0.4253616 | 0.01416184 |
| PC aa C30:0 | −0.3589317 | 0.03137787 |
| PC ae C40:1 | −0.3355771 | 0.02210991 |
| lysoPC a C17:0 | −0.322115 | 0.02210991 |
| PC aa C36:2 | −0.2985986 | 0.01241476 |
| PC ae C34:2 | −0.297975 | 0.01884033 |
| lysoPC a C28:1 | −0.2948432 | 0.01884033 |
| PC aa C34:2 | −0.2661214 | 0.01241476 |
| PC ae C36:2 | −0.2586741 | 0.03137787 |
| PC ae C36:3 | -0.2546263 | 0.03763856 |
| PC aa C36:3 | −0.2350526 | 0.03137787 |
| lysoPC a C16:0 | −0.2223977 | 0.04041611 |
| Trp | −0.2181965 | 0.01884033 |
| ADMA | 0.25872497 | 0.03833323 |
| C18:1 | 0.28073695 | 0.03750482 |
| ADMA/Arg | 0.48864835 | 0.00423649 |
| tADMASDMA/Arg | 0.43152368 | 0.0065969 |
Figure 3Correlations between significant metabolites.
Figure 4Individual analyte concentrations (adjusted for sex and batch) for significant metabolites (a,b) and metabolite ratios (c). CTRL (purple dots), ACM (red dots). Open circles indicate imputed values for original measurements being below the system’s detection limit. Alpha-AAA: alpha-aminoadipic acid; Trp: tryptophan; C3: carnitine C3; Arg: arginine; ADMA: asymmetric dimethylarginine.
Figure 5Individual analyte concentrations (adjusted for sex and batch) for glycerophospholipids with significant differences between ACM (red dots) and control samples (purple dots).