| Literature DB >> 33805493 |
Mai A Amer1, Reham Wasfi1, Ahmed S Attia2,3, Mohamed A Ramadan2.
Abstract
Proteus mirabilis is a frequent cause of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Several virulence factors contribute to its pathogenesis, but swarming motility, biofilm formation, and urease activity are considered the hallmarks. The increased prevalence in antibiotic resistance among uropathogens is alarming and requires searching for new treatment alternatives. With this in mind, our study aims to investigate antivirulence activity of indole derivatives against multidrug resistant P. mirabilis isolates. Ethyl acetate (EtOAc) extracts from Enterobacter sp. (rhizobacterium), isolated from Egyptian soil samples were tested for their ability to antagonize the virulence capacity and biofilm activity of P. mirabilis uropathogens. Extracts of two Enterobacter sp. isolates (coded Zch127 and Cbg70) showed the highest antivirulence activities against P. mirabilis. The two promising rhizobacteria Zch127 and Cbg70 were isolated from soil surrounding: Cucurbita pepo (Zucchini) and Brassica oleracea var. capitata L. (Cabbage), respectively. Sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (Sub-MICs) of the two extracts showed potent antibiofilm activity with significant biofilm reduction of ten P. mirabilis clinical isolates (p-value < 0.05) in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, the Zch127 extract showed anti-urease, anti-swarming and anti-swimming activity against the tested strains. Indole derivatives identified represented key components of indole pyruvate, indole acetamide pathways; involved in the synthesis of indole acetic acid. Additional compounds for indole acetonitrile pathway were detected in the Zch127 extract which showed higher antivirulence activity. Accordingly, the findings of the current study model the feasibility of using these extracts as promising antivirulence agent against the P. mirabilis uropathogens and as potential therapy for treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs).Entities:
Keywords: Enterobacter sp.; Proteus mirabilis; anti-swarming; anti-urease, anti-biofilm; microbial indole derivatives
Year: 2021 PMID: 33805493 PMCID: PMC8065651 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10040363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Figure 1Antivirulence activity of 13 bacterial culture extracts on P. mirabilis P1 isolate. The effect of 0.5X of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (Extracts no. G1r21, Cbg73, G2p78: 1.25 mg/mL, G1r17, G1p98, Zch127: 0.625 mg/mL extracts no. Mz55, Tf110, Tf112, Pt128: 0.312 mg/mL, extracts no. Pt101: 0.156 mg/mL and extracts G4r26, Cbg70: 0.08 mg/mL) and 0.25X MIC of the bacterial culture extracts containing indole derivatives on P. mirabilis isolate P1 (A) Normalized biofilm formation, (B) Diameter of swarming motility, and (C) Relative urease activity, where the values were obtained in the absence of extracts after 3 h of incubation were set as 100 %, and all other values were expressed relative to this value. Data represents the mean of at least 3 biological replicas. Statistical analysis using two-way ANOVA, which was followed by multiple comparisons test with a significance level at * p < 0.05; ψ p < 0.01; λ p < 0.001.
Figure 2Effect of Enterobacter sp. culture supernatant extracts on bacterial growth of P. mirabilis. Growth of Proteus mirabilis isolates under the effect of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (sub-MIC) (0.5X MIC) concentrations of Cbg70 (0.08 mg/mL) and Zch127 (0.6 mg/mL) extracts at different time points measured as turbidity (OD600 nm) while shaking at 250 rpm. Bacterial culture supplemented with DMSO in the same concentration as extract served as DMSO control. Each experiment was performed using three different cultures for each isolate, and the average data of the ten isolates is shown.
Figure 3Inhibitory effect of Enterobacter sp. culture supernatant on biofilm formation of P. mirabilis isolates. Average biofilm formation index of P. mirabilis isolates following treatment with sub- MICs of the indole extracts: DMSO control (striped bars), at 0.5X MIC (black bars), 0.25X MIC (white bars), and 0.125X MIC (grey bars): (A) Culture supernatant of extract Cbg70 at concentrations ranging from (20 to 80 µg/mL), (B) Culture supernatant of extract Zch127 at concentrations ranging from (0.15 to 0.6 mg/mL), Data represents the mean of at least 3 biological replicates, and error bars show standard error of the mean. Statistically difference was determined by student’s t-test * p < 0.05; ψ p < 0.01; λ p < 0.001 compared with DMSO control.
Figure 4Inhibitory Effect of Zch127 culture extract on motility. The effect of Zch127 at sub-MICs on the motility of 10 P. mirabilis isolates (A) Swarming motility at 0.125X, 0.25X, and 0.5X MIC; (B) Swimming motility at 0.25X and 0.5X MIC, Data represents the mean of 3 experiments, and error bars shows standard error. Statistical difference was determined by student’s t-test, * p < 0.05; ψ p < 0.01; λ p < 0.001 compared with DMSO control; (C) Representative images of the effect of extract Zch127 on swarming motility of P. mirabilis isolate P1; (D) Representative images of the effect of extract Zch127 on swimming motility of P. mirabilis isolate P1.
Figure 5Effect of crude supernatant extracts of Cbg70 and Zch127 on urease activity. The relative urease activity of the P. mirabilis isolates in the presence of sub-MICs of extracts: (A) Cbg70; and (B) Zch127, at different concentrations (0.5X, 0.25X and 0.125X MIC). The values were obtained in the absence of extract after 3 h of incubation were set at 100 %, and all other values were expressed relative to this value. The data represents the means of three independent experiments and error bars show standard error of the mean. Statistical difference was determined by student’s t-test * p < 0.05; ψ p < 0.01; λ p < 0.001 compared with DMSO control.
Fold changes in minimum inhibitory concentration of selected antibiotics in presence of indole derivatives crude extracts at sub-MIC against Proteus mirabilis isolates.
| Antibiotic | Isolate No. | MIC | MIC with Extract Cbg70 a | Fold Change in MIC with Cbg70 | MIC with Extract Zch127 b | Fold Change in MIC with Zch127 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 64(R) | 32(R) | −2X | 16(R) | −4X |
|
| 16(R) | 16(R) | − | 4(R) | −4X | |
|
| 16(R) | 16(R) | − | 8(R) | −2X | |
|
| 32(R) | 32(R) | − | 32(R) | − | |
|
| 4(R) | 8(R) | 2X | 4(R) | − | |
|
| 128(R) | 128(R) | − | 64(R) | −2X | |
|
| 64(R) | 64(R) | − | 64(R) | − | |
|
| 8(R) | 8(R) | − | 8(R) | − | |
|
| 2(I) | 1(S) | −2X | 1(S) | −2X | |
|
| 16(R) | 16(R) | − | 8(R) | −2X | |
|
|
| 16(R) | 16(R) | − | 16(R) | − |
|
| 16(R) | 32(R) | 2X | 64(R) | 4X | |
|
| 32(R) | 64(R) | 2X | 64(R) | 2X | |
|
| 32(R) | 64(R) | 2X | 32(R) | − | |
|
| 4(R) | 8(R) | 2X | 8(R) | 2X | |
|
| 64(R) | 64(R) | − | 64(R) | − | |
|
| 64(R) | 64(R) | − | 64(R) | − | |
|
| 16(R) | 8(R) | −2X | 32 (R) | 2X | |
|
| 8(R) | 8(R) | − | 8(R) | − | |
|
| 64(R) | 32(R) | −2X | 64(R) | − | |
|
|
| 4(S) | 4(S) | − | 0.5(S) | −8X |
|
| 8(S) | 8(S) | − | 2(S) | −4X | |
|
| 8(S) | 16(S) | 2X | 1(S) | −8X | |
|
| 8(S) | 16(S) | 2X | 2(S) | −4X | |
|
| 4(S) | 8(S) | 2X | 0.5(S) | −8X | |
|
| 8(S) | 32(I) | 4X | 0.5(S) | −16X | |
|
| 16(S) | 16(S) | − | 0.5(S) | −32X | |
|
| 4(S) | 4(S) | − | 4(S) | − | |
|
| 4(S) | 16(S) | 4X | 1(S) | −4X | |
|
| 8(S) | 32(S) | 4X | 0.5(S) | −16X |
a sub-MIC = 0.08 mg/mL, b sub-MIC = 0.6 mg/mL. (−) before fold of change denotes decrease in MIC. Results of MIC was interpreted according to CLSI [28] into Resistant (R), Intermediate (I), Sensitive (S).
LC-MS identified peaks of the extract from isolates Cbg70 and Zch127and their fragmentation pattern.
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.87 | 13 | 205[M+H] + (205,159,144,143,130,117,115) | Tryptophan |
| 8.01 | 30 | 176[M+H] + (176,130, 103) | Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) |
| 8.01 | 33 | 162[M+H] + (162,144,143,117,115) | Indole-3- ethanol (TOL) |
| 8.3 | 33 | 146[M+H] + (146,118,117,91) | Indole-3-aldehyde |
| 11.2 | 45 | 205[M+2H] + (205,142, 139,117) | Indole-3-pyruvic acid |
| 11.88 | 48 | 198[M+K] + (198,133,118) | Indole-3-acetaldehyde (IAld) |
| 1.07 | 3 | 188[M-H]− (188,128, 59) | Indole-3-propionic acid |
| 4.62 | 17 | 158[M-H]− (158,130, 117) | Indole-3- acetaldehyde |
| 6.76 | 28 | 174[M-H]− (174,130, 128) | Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) |
| 7.43 | 31 | 160[M-H]− (160,130) | Indole-3-ethanol (TOL) |
| 7.77 | 31 | 173[M-H]− (174,131, 130, 111) | Indole-3-acetamide |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.31 | 10 | 132[M+H] + (132,86, 69) | 3-methyl indole (skatole) |
| 1.98 | 7 | 162[M+H] + (162,144,120) | Indole-3-carboxylic acid (I3CA) |
| 6.66 | 19 | 176[M+H] + (176,130, 118, 103, 77) | Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) |
| 6.93 | 19 | 245[M+K] + (245,174, 173, 130) | Indole-3-lactic acid (ILA) |
| 8.01 | 26 | 162[M+H] + (162,144,143,117,115) | Indole-3-ethanol (TOL) |
| 9.04 | 37 | 205[M+2H] + (205,158,130,87,72) | Indole-3-pyruvic acid |
| 13.1 | 76 | 199[M+H+K] + (199,133,117) | Indole-3- acetaldehyde |
| 14.46 | 86 | 196[M+H+K] + (196,131,117, 79) | Indole-3-acetonitrile |
| 2.84 | 9 | 203[M-H]− (203, 158, 146, 142, 132,118, 116) | Tryptophan |
| 6.27 | 18 | 173[M-H]− (173, 143, 130) | Indole-3-acetamide (IAM) |
| 8.72 | 50 | 202[M-H]- (202, 158, 130) | Indole-3-pyruvic acid |
| 16.21 | 97 | 130[M-H]- (130, 115.4) | 3-methyl indole (skatole) |
* Rt: Retention time.
Figure 6HPLC chromatograms of the authentic indole compounds (A) and the ethyl acetate extract containing indole compounds from (B): isolate Cbg70 and (C): isolate Zch127 after 4 days of incubation.
The concentration (µM) of the identified compounds, in extracts Cbg70 and Zch 127 after 2 and 4 days of incubation, using HPLC confirmed by co-elution with the authentic indole derivative.
| Compound | Rt | Cbg70 | Cbg70 | Zch127 | Zch127 4 days (µM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tryptophan | 4.040 | 44.226 | 36.648 | 40.798 | 9.866 |
| IAM | 8.221 | 22.800 | 25.120 | 19.120 | 22.880 |
| ILA | 11.984 | 21.465 | 24.148 | 24.045 | 10.939 |
| IAA | 18.005 | 99.915 | 199.680 | 117.241 | 321.278 |
| IAN | 24.830 | 0 | 0 | 4.407 | 19.729 |
| IPA | 36.380 | 19.428 | 24.390 | 24.978 | 7.232 |
Figure 7Proposed pathways of indole acetic acid (IAA) synthesis in the supernatant extracts of the Enterobacter sp. cultures, where ** means that the compound was detected in both cultures while * means that it was detected in the extract of Zch127 culture only, where Trp: tryptophan, IAM: indole-3-acetamide, IAN: indole-3-acetamide, IPA: indole-3-pyruvic acid, ILA: indole-3-lactic acid, IaAld: indole-3-acetaldehyde, TOL: indole-3-ethanol and ICA: indole-3-carboxylic acid.
Figure 8Effect of synthetic indole-3-acetonitrile (IAN) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) at concentration of 50 µg/mL on the virulence phenotype of P. mirabilis (A) Biofilm formation index of ten P. mirabilis isolates, (B) Swarming motility of four P. mirabilis isolates, Data represents the mean of at least 3 replicates, and error bars show standard error of the mean and statistical difference was evaluated by student’s t-test * p < 0.05; ψ p < 0.01; λ p < 0.001 compared with DMSO control.