| Literature DB >> 33804972 |
Aleksandra S Kristo1, Angelos K Sikalidis1, Arzu Uzun2.
Abstract
Healthy nutritional habits are of vital importance for good health and quality of life for all individuals in all life stages. Nutritional habits shaped in early childhood set the foundation for future dietary practices applied through lifespan, hence informing risk towards chronic diseases. A key contributor to child health is maternal impact. A healthy childhood status translates into increased lifespan, health, and life-quality, as well as better family and social interactions and improved academic performance. These conditions can contribute to a healthier and more vibrant workforce, and thus extend positive impact on the economic and overall development of a country. Evidence related to maternal impact on childhood dietary habits is limited in Turkey, an emerging economy with notable disparities and a significant segment (approximately one third) of its 83 million population under the age of 30. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the socioeconomic status (SES) of mothers on the dietary habits of their preschool children. A pilot cross-sectional observational study was conducted involving the mothers of 109 preschool children aged 4-6 years. Data on the nutritional status of children were collected through a food frequency questionnaire and a 24-h recall interview, while sociodemographic information was also collected, and statistical analyses conducted. An unexpected finding regarding the lack of association between the socioeconomic and employment status of mothers and the nutritional intakes of their children was observed. Interestingly, it appears that more traditional societal and nutritional practices typically undertaken in the case of lower SES, especially in more traditional settings like the case of Turkey, appear to extend a protective effect as per the nutritional habits and ensuing obesity risk in the case of children of women with lower SES. Another way to interpret our finding is that the difference in education and SES is not adequate to produce a significant effect in terms of children dietary intake. This is an interesting finding that warrants further study. Additionally, such studies serve to increase awareness about the importance of healthy nutritional practices in preschool children and the critical role of the mother on their nutritional status, particularly in the Turkish idiosyncratic setting.Entities:
Keywords: health; lifespan nutrition; maternal child nutrition; nutritional habits; preschool children; socioeconomic status (SES)
Year: 2021 PMID: 33804972 PMCID: PMC8063956 DOI: 10.3390/bs11040042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Sci (Basel) ISSN: 2076-328X
Figure 1The seven geographical at-large regions of Turkey. The study was conducted in the city of Istanbul (Marmara region).
Education and Income characteristics of participating mothers.
|
|
|
| Primary-school | 53 (48.7) |
| Middle-school | 21 (19.3) |
| High-school | 27 (24.7) |
| University (BSc) | 7 (6.4) |
| University (post-graduate) | 1 (0.9) |
|
|
|
| High (>3500 TL/month net; approx. $1220) | 11 (10.1) |
| Medium (1300–3500 TL/month net; approx. $450—$1220) | 63 (57.8) |
| Low (<1300 TL/month net; approx. $450) | 35 (32.1) |
| TL: Turkish Lira/$: US dollars |
Maternal employment status, education and income levels of mothers vs. energy and macronutrient (Carbohydrate, Protein and Lipid) intake of their preschool children.
|
|
|
| |
| Energy (kcal/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 1302.6 ± 108.1 |
| Non-employed | 81 (74.3) | 1372.4 ± 68.6 | |
| CHO (g/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 151.1 ± 14.4 |
| Non-employed | 81 (74.3) | 156.9 ± 7.2 | |
| Protein (g/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 43.1 ± 4.6 |
| Non-employed | 81 (74.3) | 45.6 ± 2.2 | |
| Lipid (g/day) | Employed | 28 (25.3) | 57.5 ± 6.6 |
| Non-employed | 81 (74.3) | 61.4 ± 4.4 | |
|
|
|
| |
| Energy (kcal/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 1327.7 ± 95.9 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 1377.2 ± 75.7 | |
| CHO (g/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 151.5 ± 12.1 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 158.2 ± 7.5 | |
| Protein (g/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 44.6 ± 3.4 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 45.6 ± 2.4 | |
| Lipid (g/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 59.5 ± 5.3 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 61.3 ± 5.2 | |
|
|
|
| |
| Energy (kcal/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 1412.0 ± 162.7 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 1342.0 ± 57.9 | |
| CHO (g/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 156.5 ± 13.8 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 155.6 ± 7.3 | |
| Protein (g/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 49.1 ± 4.8 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 44.2 ± 2.1 | |
| Lipid (g/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 64.3 ± 11.5 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 59.4 ± 3.3 |
CHO: Carbohydrate intake; SEM: Standard Error of Mean; Reference dietary values are provided in the Supplement (Tables S1–S4).
Association of maternal employment status, education and income levels and dietary intake of minerals, vitamins and fiber of children.
|
|
|
| |
| Ca (mg/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 614.4 ± 64.8 |
| Non-employed | 81 (74.3) | 724.5 ± 40.3 | |
| Fe (mg/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 5.75 ± 0.6 |
| Non-employed | 81 (74.3) | 6.9 ± 0.4 | |
| Employed | 28 (25.7) | 491.2 ± 67.9 | |
| Non-employed | 81 (74.3) | ||
| Vit D (IU/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 1.2 ± 0.3 |
| Non-employed | 81 (74.3) | 3.1 ± 0.9 | |
| Vit E (mg/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 11.1 ± 1.4 |
| Non-employed | 81 (74.3) | 13.7 ± 1.5 | |
| Vit C (mg/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 66.6 ± 8.6 |
| Non-employed | 81 (74.3) | ||
| Fiber (g/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 11.1 ± 1.1 |
| Non-employed | 81 (74.3) | 15.1 ± 1.0 | |
|
|
|
| |
| Ca (mg/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 660.2 ± 51.7 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 728.7 ± 46.4 | |
| Fe (mg/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 6.35 ± 0.51 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 6.94 ± 0.44 | |
| Upper | 45 (41.3) | 536.54 ± 64.8 | |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | ||
| Vit D (IU/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 3.8 ± 1.7 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 2.1 ± 0.5 | |
| Vit E (mg/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 11.9 ± 1.3 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 13.9±1.9 | |
| Upper | 45 (41.3) | 90.1 ± 8.6 | |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | ||
| Fiber (g/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 13.1 ± 1.3 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 14.9 ± 1.1 | |
|
|
|
| |
| Ca (mg/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 718.2 ± 68.4 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 700.8 ± 41.2 | |
| Fe (mg/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 7.5 ± 1.0 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 6.5 ± 0.3 | |
| Low | 35 (32.1) | ||
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 626.4 ± 52.7 | |
| Vit D (IU/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 4.4 ± 1.1 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 2.2 ± 0.5 | |
| Vit E (mg/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 16.1 ± 0.4 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 12.3 ± 0.9 | |
| Low | 35 (32.1) | 106.8 ± 16.5 | |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | ||
| Fiber (g/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 16.6 ± 0.5 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 13.4 ± 0.8 |
An asterisk (*) and bold denote statistically significant difference at p < 0.05. All other comparisons yielded p > 0.1 values; Nutrients whereby a statistically significant difference was found are shown in bold. ANOVA analyses results reflected in the table. SEM: Standard Error of Mean. Reference dietary values are provided in the Supplement (Tables S1–S4).
Association of maternal employment status, education, income levels and dietary intake of B-complex vitamins for children.
|
|
|
| |
| Thiamin (B1) (mg/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 0.55 ± 0.04 |
| Not employed | 81 (74.3) | 0.60 ± 0.1 | |
| Riboflavin (B2) (mg/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 0.95 ± 0.1 |
| Not employed | 81 (74.3) | 1.10 ± 0.06 | |
| Niacin (B3) (mg/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 5.89 ± 1.14 |
| Not employed | 81 (74.3) | 6.71 ± 0.62 | |
| Pantothenic Acid (B5) (mg/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 2.81 ± 0.29 |
| Not employed | 81 (74.3) | 3.40 ± 0.19 | |
| Pyridoxine (B6) (mg/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 0.92 ± 0.15 |
| Not employed | 81 (74.3) | 1.04 ± 0.09 | |
| Biotin (B7) (μg/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 23.10 ± 2.68 |
| Not employed | 81 (74.3) | 29.35 ± 2.36 | |
| Vit B12 (μg/day) | Employed | 28 (25.7) | 3.08 ± 0.51 |
| Not employed | 81 (74.3) | 3.44 ± 0.28 | |
| Employed | 28 (25.7) | 125.71 ± 13.10 | |
| Not employed | 81 (74.3) | ||
|
|
|
| |
| Thiamin (B1) (mg/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 0.54 ± 0.05 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 0.62 ± 0.04 | |
| Riboflavin (B2) (mg/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 0.98 ± 0.08 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 1.10 ± 0.06 | |
| Niacin (B3) (mg/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 6.62 ± 0.85 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 6.54 ± 0.71 | |
| Pantothenic Acid (B5) (mg/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 3.24 ± 0.26 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 3.44 ± 0.21 | |
| Pyridoxine (B6) (mg/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 0.96 ± 0.13 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 1.05 ± 0.08 | |
| Biotin (B7) (μg/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 25.96 ± 1.85 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 29.97 ± 2.91 | |
| Vit B12 (μg/day) | Upper | 45 (41.3) | 3.42 ± 0.51 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 3.35 ± 0.26 | |
| Upper | 45 (41.3) | 145.81 ± 12.34 | |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | ||
|
|
|
| |
| Thiamin (B1) (mg/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 0.6 ± 0.03 | |
| Riboflavin (B2) (mg/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 1.1 ± 0.09 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 1.1 ± 0.06 | |
| Niacin (B3) (mg/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 8.1 ± 1.6 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 6.1 ± 0.5 | |
| Pantothenic Acid (B5) (mg/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 3.7 ± 0.4 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 3.2 ± 0.2 | |
| Pyridoxine (B6) (mg/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 1.1 ± 0.14 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 1.0 ± 0.1 | |
| Biotin (B7) (μg/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 33.2 ± 6.3 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 26.5 ± 1.6 | |
| Vit B12 (μg/day) | Low | 35 (32.1) | 3.8 ± 0.7 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 3.3 ± 0.2 | |
| Low | 35 (32.1) | 182.9 ± 4.2 | |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) |
An asterisk (*) and bold denote statistically significant difference at p < 0.05, all other comparisons yielded p > 0.1 values. Nutrients whereby a statistically significant difference was found are shown in bold. ANOVA analyses results reflected in the table. SEM: Standard Error of Mean. Reference dietary values are provided in the Supplement (Tables S1–S4).
Association of maternal, employment status, educational level and income level and BMI for age and sex of children.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Employed | 28 (25.7) | 16.03 ± 0.72 |
| Not employed | 81 (74.3) | 16.32 ± 0.33 | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Upper | 45 (41.3) | 16.45 ± 0.42 |
| Low | 64 (58.7) | 16.17 ± 0.40 | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Low | 35 (32.1) | 16.75 ± 0.75 |
| Middle | 74 (67.9) | 16.11 ± 0.30 |
BMI: Body Mass Index (for age and sex as per WHO standards). SEM: Standard Error of Mean. All comparisons yielded p > 0.1 values.