| Literature DB >> 33803816 |
Cristina M González1, Rebeca Gil2, Gemma Moraga1, Alejandra Salvador2.
Abstract
Persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.f.) crop has markedly increased in Spain, and "Rojo Brillante" persimmon is the main cultivated variety. This astringent cultivar requires de-astringency treatment before commercialization, which may involve an extra cost. Its short commercial season implies handling large volumes of fruits with consequent postharvest losses. Therefore, the development of derived added-value products is of much interest. In this study, astringent and non-astringent "Rojo Brillante" persimmons were dehydrated by following a natural drying method used in Asia. The drying kinetics and physico-chemical properties were analyzed for 81 days. The results indicated subsequent reductions in weight, water content, and water activity throughout the drying process, and the equatorial diameter decreased. All the employed thin-layer mathematical models were suitable for representing the drying characteristics of both products with similar behavior. The effective water diffusivity values were 5.07 × 10-11 m2 s-1 and 6.07 × 10-11 m2 s-1 for astringent and non-astringent persimmon samples, respectively. The drying treatment significantly decreased the soluble tannins content, and the astringent samples obtained similar values to those obtained for the non-astringent samples in 20 days. The external and internal flesh of the astringent fruit remained orange through the drying period, while brown coloration in the non-astringent fruit was observed after 57 drying days. Therefore, prior de-astringency treatment would not be necessary.Entities:
Keywords: Diospyros kaki; dehydrated persimmon; drying rate; post-harvest losses; thin-layer modeling
Year: 2021 PMID: 33803816 PMCID: PMC8003271 DOI: 10.3390/foods10030647
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Mathematical models given by several authors for drying curves.
| Model | Mathematical Equation | References |
|---|---|---|
| Newton |
| [ |
| Page |
| [ |
| Midilli et al. |
| [ |
| Logarithmic |
| [ |
| Henderson and Pabis |
| [ |
| Verma model |
| [ |
k, n, a, g, c, b: Constants of each model applied; t: Time in days.
Figure 1Weight loss (a), water content (g/100 g product on a wet basis) (b) and water activity (a) (c) of the non-astringent (no Ast) and astringent (Ast) persimmon samples during the drying treatment. Bars represent the least significant difference (LSD) intervals (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2Images of the astringent and non-astringent persimmon cv. “Rojo Brillante” during the drying process.
Figure 3Equatorial diameter (a), longitudinal diameter (b), and external color index (c) of the non-astringent (no Ast) and astringent (Ast) persimmon samples during the drying treatment. Bars represent the least significant difference (LSD) intervals (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4Total soluble solids (TSS) of the non-astringent (no Ast) and astringent (Ast) persimmon samples during the drying treatment (a). Total soluble tannin content (ST) of the non-astringent (no Ast) and astringent (Ast) persimmon samples up to the drying treatment at Day 40 (b). Bars represent the least significant difference (LSD) intervals (p ≤ 0.05).
Values of the parameters of the models for astringent persimmon “Rojo Brillante”.
| Models Parameters | Statistical Parameters | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Newton | 0.035 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.997 | 0.001 | 0.017 | 0.000 | 7.071 |
| Page | 0.030 | 1.043 | - | - | - | - | 0.997 | 0.001 | 0.017 | 0.000 | 9.021 |
| Midilli et al. | 0.027 | 1.101 | 1.028 | - | - | 0.000 | 0.998 | 0.000 | 0.011 | 0.000 | 10.243 |
| Logarithmic | 0.039 | - | 1.022 | - | 0.019 | - | 0.998 | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.000 | 7.965 |
| Henderson and Pabis | 0.037 | - | 1.037 | - | - | - | 0.998 | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.000 | 7.586 |
| Verma model | 0.036 | - | 0.007 | 0.036 | - | - | 0.998 | 0.001 | 0.018 | 0.000 | 7.663 |
k, n, a, g, c, b: Constants of each model applied. R2: determination coefficient; X2: reduced chi-square; MBE: mean bias error; RMSE: root-mean-square error; PE%: relative percent error.
Values of the parameters of the models for non-astringent persimmon “Rojo Brillante”.
| Models Parameters | Statistical Parameters | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Newton | 0.037 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.999 | 0.000 | 0.008 | 0.000 | 2.305 |
| Page | 0.032 | 1.040 | - | - | - | - | 0.999 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.000 | 4.632 |
| Midilli et al. | 0.041 | 0.983 | 1.042 | - | - | 0.000 | 0.999 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 1.943 |
| Logarithmic | 0.039 | - | 1.028 | - | 0.011 | - | 0.999 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 2.032 |
| Henderson & Pabis | 0.038 | - | 1.037 | - | - | - | 0.999 | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 3.095 |
| Verma model | 0.037 | - | 0.017 | 0.037 | - | - | 0.999 | 0.000 | 0.008 | 0.000 | 2.305 |
k, n, a, g, c, b: Constants of each model applied. R2: determination coefficient; X2: reduced chi-square; MBE: mean bias error; RMSE: root-mean-square error; PE%: relative percent error.
Figure 5Modeling the drying curves of the astringent (a) and non-astringent (b) persimmon fruits with the Midilli (dotted line), Logarithmic (dashed line), and Verma models (gray line). Drying rate of the astringent and non-astringent persimmon samples (c). Effective water diffusivity (D) determination by equation in the astringent and non-astringent persimmon samples (d).