| Literature DB >> 35353819 |
Abdul Khaliq1,2, Wen-Fang Li1, Shahbaz Ali3, Syed Tanveer Shah2, Zong-Huan Ma1, Juan Mao1, Yasir Niaz3, Bai-Hong Chen1, Inzamam Ul Haq4, Rashid Al-Yahyai5,6, Mohamed A A Ahmed7, Abdullah Ahmed Al-Ghamdi8, Mohamed S Elshikh8, Ali Tan Kee Zuan9.
Abstract
Poor postharvest handling, microbial infestation, and high respiration rate are some the factors are responsible for poor storage life of perishable commodities. Therefore, effective preservation of these commodities is needed to lower the damages and extend shelf life. Preservation is regarded as the action taken to maintain desired properties of a perishable commodity as long as possible. Persimmon (Diospyros kaki) is perishable fruit with high nutritive value; however, has very short shelf-life. Therefore, effective preservation and drying is needed to extend its storage life. Drying temperature and preservatives significantly influence the quality of perishable vegetables and fruits during drying. The current study investigated the effect of different temperatures and preservatives on drying kinetics and organoleptic quality attributes of persimmon. Persimmon fruits were treated with preservatives (25% honey, 25% aloe vera, 2% sodium benzoate, 1% potassium metabisulfite, and 2% citric acid solutions) under different drying temperatures (40, 45, and 50°C). All observed parameters were significantly affected by individual effects of temperatures and preservatives, except ash contents. Similarly, interactive effects were significant for all parameters except total soluble sugars, ash contents, and vitamin C. Generally, fruits treated with citric acid and dried under 50°C had 8.2% moisture loss hour-1, 14.9 drying hours, 0.030 g H2O g-1 hr-1, 1.23° Brix of total soluble solids, 6.71 pH, 1.35% acidity, and 6.3 mg vitamin C. These values were better than the rest of the preservatives and drying temperatures used in the study. Therefore, treating fruits with citric acid and drying at 50°C was found a promising technique to extend storage life of persimmon fruits. It is recommended that persimmon fruits dried at 50°C and preserved in citric acid can be used for longer storage period.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35353819 PMCID: PMC8967049 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1General overview of the solar drier.
Mathematical models for testing of thin-layer drying kinetics of persimmon.
| Equation | Name | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| MR = exp (-kt) | Newton | [ |
| MR = exp (-ktn) | Page | [ |
| MR = exp (-(kt))n | Modified page | [ |
| MR = a1exp (-kt)1 + a2exp (-kt)2 | Two term exponential | [ |
| MR = 1 + at+ (at)2 | Wang and Singh | [ |
Probabilty and significance for moisture loss, drying time, drying rate, total soluble sugars, pH, acidity, ash contents and vitamin C of persimmon fruit subjected to different drying temperatures and preservatives.
| Treatments | Moisture loss(% hr-1) | Drying time(hrs) | Drying rate(g H2O g DM hr-1) | TSS(°Brix) | pH | Acidity(%) | Ash(g) | Vitamin C(mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.0031 | 0.0051 | 0.0000 | 0.0212 | 0.0000 | 0.0312 | 0.0472 | 0.0112 |
|
| 0.0216 | 0.0011 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0011 | 0.0305* | 0.0099 |
|
| 0.0360 | 0.0096 | 0.0016 | 0.0763ns | 0.04205 | 0.0451 | 0.3861ns | 0.0993ns |
* and ** show that values are significant at 0.05% and 0.01% confidence interval respectively, while ns indicates non-significant values at 0.05% confidence interval.
Moisture lost (%), drying time (hrs) and drying rate (gH2O.gD.M. hr-1) of dried persimmon as affected by drying temperatures and preservatives.
| Treatments | Moisture lost (%.hr-1) | Drying time (hrs) | Drying rate (gH2O. gD.M. hr-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Storage temperature (°C) | |||
|
| 6.1 c | 17.3 a | 0.023 b |
|
| 6.8 b | 16.2 b | 0.025 b |
|
| 8.2 a | 13.8 c | 0.031 a |
|
| 0.44 | 1.04 | 0.004 |
|
| |||
|
| 6.9 c | 16.5 a | 0.026 b |
|
| 6.5 d | 16.2 a | 0.026 b |
|
| 7.3 b | 15.3 b | 0.024 c |
|
| 6.4 d | 15.2 b | 0.027 b |
|
| 7.8 a | 14.1 c | 0.030 a |
|
| 0.35 | 0.84 | 0.002 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
means sharing the same letters are non-significant at p<0.05.
** and * indicate correlation is significant at the 0.01and 0.05 level, respectively.
Fig 2The interaction effect of drying temperature and preservatives on moisture loss (A) and drying time (B) of persimmon fruit.
Bars in the figure represent means ± S.E. (n = 3), and means sharing the same letters are non-significant at p<0.05.
Fig 3The effect of drying temperature and preservatives on drying rate (A) and pH (B) of persimmon fruit.
Bars in the figure represent means ± S.E. (n = 3), and means sharing the same letters are non-significant at p<0.05.
TSS (°Brix), pH, Acidity (%), Ash (g) and Vitamin C (mg) of of dried persimmon as affected by drying temperatures and preservatives.
| Treatments | TSS (°Brix) | pH | Acidity (%) | Ash (g) | Vitamin C (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storage temperature (°C) | |||||
|
| 1.04 b | 6.14 b | 1.11 a | 4.28 b | 5.60 a |
|
| 1.06 b | 6.32 a | 0.94 b | 4.67 b | 5.60 a |
|
| 1.25 a | 6.13 b | 0.93 b | 5.81 a | 5.24 b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| 1.08 c | 6.71 a | 1.12 b | 5.69 a | 5.20 c |
|
| 1.07 c | 6.17 b | 0.89 c | 4.23 d | 5.72 b |
|
| 1.15 b | 6.60 a | 0.70 d | 5.17 b | 5.42 c |
|
| 1.09 c | 6.19 b | 0.96 c | 4.70 c | 5.22 c |
|
| 1.23 a | 5.30 c | 1.35 a | 4.20 d | 6.31 a |
|
| 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.45 | 0.25 |
|
| |||||
|
| NS | NS | NS | ||
NS = non-significant
* = significant.
Fig 4The effect of drying temperature and preservatives on acidity of persimmon fruit.
Bars in the figure represent means ± S.E. (n = 3), and means sharing the same letters are non-significant at p<0.05.
Coefficient of regression and root mean square error of published equations for drying kinetics of persimmon.
| Model’s Equation | R2 | Root mean square error |
|---|---|---|
| MR = exp (-kt) | 0.98 | 0.0003 |
| MR = exp (-ktn) | 0.79 | 0.0019 |
| MR = exp (-(kt))n | 0.89 | 0.0008 |
| MR = a1exp (-kt)1 + a2exp (-kt)2 | 0.99 | 0.0001 |
| MR = 1 + at+ (at)2 | 0.98 | 0.0003 |
R2 represents the coefficient of regression.
Pearson’s correlation analysis among different organoleptic quality attributes of persimmon fruit treated with preservatives and dried under different temperatures.
| Moisture loss | Drying time | Drying rate | Total soluble sugars | pH | acidity | Ash contents | Vitamin C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | -0.16 | 0.79 | 0.84 | -0.30 | -0.05 | 0.68 | 0.20 |
|
| 1 | 0.01 | -0.06 | -0.12 | 0.53 | 0.14 | 0.07 | |
|
| 1 | 0.75 | -0.55 | 0.25 | 0.49 | 0.29 | ||
|
| 1 | -0.44 | 0.21 | 0.69 | 0.27 | |||
|
| 1 | -0.56 | 0.08 | -0.78 | ||||
|
| 1 | 0.11 | 0.43 | |||||
|
| 1 | -0.18 | ||||||
|
| 1 |
** and * indicate correlation is significant at the 0.01and 0.05 level, respectively.