| Literature DB >> 33803814 |
Elena Canciani1, Riccardo Sirello1, Gaia Pellegrini1, Dolaji Henin1, Mariachiara Perrotta1, Marilisa Toma1, Nataliya Khomchyna1, Claudia Dellavia1.
Abstract
Background andEntities:
Keywords: dental personalized medicine; gel; hyaluronic acid; impaired wound healing; oral mucosa; vitamins
Year: 2021 PMID: 33803814 PMCID: PMC8003116 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57030285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Figure 1(A) Graphical representation of split-mouth design involving third molars 3.8 and 4.8; (B) red arrow indicates a mesioangular third molar at orthopantomography; (C) intraoral photograph shows post-extractive site at 10 days with flap closure via the Donati suture technique with consequent excesses of tissue to maintain tensile strength and create a stable gingival coverage for better healing of the alveolar socket. (D) Post-extraction treatment regimens tested: test sites were treated with HAplus (Aminogam gel® Errekappa Euroterapici spa) gel, while control sites were not treated with any topical substances (no-HAplus).
Figure 2Gingiva: (A–C) Sections demonstrate the integrity and normal stratification of the epithelium at the healing site. Pluri-stratified squamous epithelium with ortho- and para-keratinization is depicted in pink and indicated with yellow asterisks, while basal (light blue arrows) to granular layers (white arrows) of epithelium are shown in purple. Carazzi’s H&E, total magnification 200×. (D–F) Sections stained with CD31 in brown demonstrate differences in microvascular distribution for each group. Immunostaining anti-CD31, total magnification 200×. (G–I) Sections highlighted under polarized light showing the orientation and distribution of collagen fibers in red. More evident collagen bundles are indicated with yellow arrows. Sirius red/Picric Acid, total magnification 200×.
This table reports the mean values and standard deviations of microvascular density (MVD) in both groups (HAplus: test group, no-HAplus: control group) at T0 (baseline) and T1 (10 days after tooth extraction), obtained using histomorphometrical evaluation. The microvascular density increased from T0 to T1 by about 5% in the HAplus group, and 1.5% in the no-HAplus group.
| MVD | T0 | T1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAplus | 7.00% | 11.91% | |
| no-HAplus | 7.18% | 8.62% | |
| ns |
Figure 3Histomorphometrical analysis. (A) Graphics show the increase in microvascular density (MVD) and (B) decrease in collagen content (Collagen I %) that occurred in both groups (HAplus, no-HAplus) after 10 days of healing. The MVD increases in HAplus sites resulted significantly higher than in no-HAplus sites (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) (p < 0.001). Data were normalized on relative T0 values for both MVD and % Collagen.
This table reports the mean values and standard deviations of the collagen content (% Collagen) in both groups (HAplus: test group, no-HAplus: control group) at T0 (baseline) and T1 (10 days after tooth extraction), obtained using histomorphometrical evaluation. The presence of collagen fiber content decreased from T0 to T1 by about 50% in both groups.
| Collagen | T0 | T1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAplus | 38.96% | 18.92% | |
| no-HAplus | 40.98% | 18.45% | |
| ns | ns |
Figure 4Vitamin test groups. Graphic shows the viability of the TEST groups. According to ISO 10993-5, after 24 h, a reduction up to 50% was considered slightly toxic as evident in HA-VIT-5; up to 20% of the viability was considered mildly toxic as in HA-VIT-2.5 and HA-VIT-1. After 48 h, viability increased, overcoming the HA-Control value (100%) in all experimental groups.