| Literature DB >> 30648578 |
Anita Świerczewska1, Tina Buchholz2, Matthias F Melzig2, Monika E Czerwińska1.
Abstract
Less-common fruits from Cornus spp. (Cornaceae), also named dogwoods, have shown antidiabetic, antibacterial and anti-allergic properties and are thus considered a source of phytochemicals that are beneficial to human health. The study aimed to compare the chemical compositions of the aqueous and ethanolic extracts of lyophilized fresh-picked and commercially available dried fruits of Cornus mas (Cm, cornelian cherry) and Cornus alba (Ca) fruits using HPLC-DAD-MS/MS method. Simultaneously, the α-amylase and pancreatic lipase (PL) inhibitory activities of the prepared extracts were compared by in vitro fluorescence assay based on the kinetic hydrolysis of starch or oleate ester of 4-methylumbelliferone (MUO), respectively. Additionally, a bio-assay guided identification of compounds potentially responsible for the inhibition of pancreatic enzymes was performed. Iridoids (loganic acid, cornuside) and anthocyanins (pelargonidin 3-O-galactoside) were identified in the Cm fruit extracts. Flavonoids, such as quercetin and kaempferol derivatives, were detected in the Ca fruit extracts. The chromatographic separation of the constituents of Ca fruit provided a fraction containing phenolic acids derivatives, which inhibited PL activity by 69.9 ± 4.5% at a concentration of 7.5 μg·mL-1. The IC50 of hydroxytyrosol glucoside, isolated from the most active Ca fraction, was 0.99 ± 0.10 mg·mL-1 indicating other constituents responsible for the fraction activity. The most active subfraction from Cm fruit (7.5 μg·mL-1), which inhibited PL activity by 28.3 ± 1.5%, contained pelargonidin 3-O-galactoside. Loganic acid and cornuside in highly pure form did not inhibit lipase activity. The phytochemical constituents of Cm, and particularly of Ca fruit extracts, can inhibit pancreatic enzymes and thus might be considered effective preparations in the prevention and control of hyperlipidemia related diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Anthocyanins; Digestive enzymes; Iridoids; Metabolic syndrome; Phenolic compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30648578 PMCID: PMC9298612 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.06.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Drug Anal Impact factor: 6.157
Fig. 1HPLC chromatograms of the ethanolic extracts from fruits of Cm (10 mg·mL−1) acquired at 240 nm and 520 nm. HPLC conditions: Zorbax SB-C18 (150 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm), mobile phase A: 0.1% HCOOH/H2O; B: 0.1% HCOOH/MeCN, and the gradient was as follows: 0–5min. 2–5% B; 5–40 min. 5–26% B; 40–52 min. 26–60% B; 55–60 min. 95–2% B. Cm – Cornus mas picked fresh, CmDN – Cornus mas Dary Natury, CmEH – Cornus mas Eko Herba.
Fig. 2HPLC chromatograms of the ethanolic extracts from fruits of Ca (10 mg·mL−1) acquired at 240 nm and 350 nm. HPLC conditions: Zorbax SB-C18 (150 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm), mobile phase A: 0.1% HCOOH/H2O; B: 0.1% HCOOH/MeCN, and the gradient was as follows: 0–5min. 2–5% B; 5–40 min. 5–26% B; 40–52 min. 26–60% B; 55–60 min. 95–2% B. Ca – Cornus alba picked fresh.
Retention times, UV–Vis spectra, and MS/MS data in the negative ion mode for compounds identified in the extracts from fruits of Cm and Ca.
| Peak no. | Proposed compounds/analyte | Retention time [min] | UV λmax [nm] | [M–H]−
| Fragmentary ions | Extract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Digalloyl glucose | 18.1 | 270sh | 483 | 465, 3310, 271, 193 | Cm, CmDN, CmEH |
| 2 | Loganic acid | 20.2 | 235 | 751 | 473, 375, 213 | Cm, CmDN, CmEH |
| 3 | Loganic acid glucuronide | 22.2 | 280 | 549 | 530, 451, 375, 307, 213 | Cm, CmDN, CmEH |
| 4 | Cyanidin 3- | 22.5 | 280, 517 | [M+H]+ 449 | [M+H]+ 287 | Cm |
| 5 | Gallic acid derivative | 22.9 | 270, 330 | 785 | 765, 708, 633, 483, 419, 301 | Cm, CmDN, CmEH |
| 6 | Pelargonidin 3- | 24.0 | 275, 500 | [M+H]+ 433 | [M+H]+ 271 | Cm |
| 7 | Unidentified glucuronide | 24.7 | 268 | 589 | 491, 413, 341 | CmDN, CmEH |
| 8 | Pelargonidin-3- | 25.3 | 275, 500 | [M+H]+ 579 | [M+H]+271 | Cm |
| 9 | Iridoid | 26.4 | 227 | 435 | 389, 335, 273, 227 | Cm, CmDN, CmEH |
| 10 | Digalloyl HHDP-glucose | 28.7 | 268 | 785 | 767, 700, 634, 483, 419, 301, 249 | Cm, CmDN, CmEH |
| 11 | Tetragalloyl glucose | 34.8 | 275, 360sh | 787 | 465, 313 | Cm, CmDN, CmEH |
| 12 | Cornuside | 39.7 | 280 | 541 | 379, 347, 277, 169 | Cm, CmDN, CmEH |
| 13 | Iridoid | 7.8 | 231 | 361 | 315 | |
| 14 | Iridoid | 8.7 | 230 | 361 | 315, 179 | |
| 15 | Unidentified | 10.7 | 216 | 417 | 391, 338 | |
| 16 | Hydroxytyrosol glucoside | 13.0 | 290 | 631 | 315 | |
| 17 | Unidentified | 20.0 | 280sh | 632 | 315, 277 | |
| 18 | Unidentified | 31.8 | 260 | 479 | 457, 442 | |
| 19 | Quercetin 3- | 35.1 | 260, 356 | 463 | 441, 301, 343, 151 | |
| 20 | Quercetin 3- | 35.9 | overlapped 256, 353 | 477 | 301, 179 | |
| 21 | Quercetin 3- | 35.9 | overlapped 256, 353 | 463 | 301 | |
| 22 | Kaempferol 3- | 37.8 | overlapped 256, 354 | 447 | 419, 285, 255, 151 | |
| 23 | Quercetin 3- | 37.8 | overlapped 256, 354 | 433 | 301 | |
| 24 | Quercetin 3- | 38.3 | 256, 360 | 549 | 505, 463, 387, 173 | |
| 25 | Kaempferol hexoside | 39.2 | 264, 344 | 447 | 285 | |
| 26 | Kaempferol 3- | 39.4 | 264, 349 | 461 | 285 | |
| 27 | Kaempferol malonylhexoside | 40.9 | 260, 360 | 533 | 489, 435, 373, 296 | |
| 28 | Unidentified | 50.3 | 280, 343 | 337 | 322, 217, 177 | |
[2 M–H]−.
[M + HCOOH–H]−; sh – shoulder; Cm – Cornus mas picked fresh, CmDN – Cornus mas Dary Natury, CmEH – Cornus mas Eko Herba, Ca – Cornus alba picked fresh.
Total anthocyanins (ACC) and phenols (TPC) content in the extracts from fruits of Cm and Ca.
| ACC ± SD [CCE mg·g−1] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Dried fruit | Cm | CmDN | CmEH | Ca |
| Aqueous extract | 8.8 ± 0.1 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 3.9 ± 0.1 |
| Ethanolic extract | 10.0 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 4.0 ± 0.1 |
| Methanolic extract | 12.8 ± 0.1 | – | – | 4.3 ± 0.1 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Dried fruit | Cm | CmDN | CmEH | Ca |
|
| ||||
| Aqueous extract | 41.5 ± 3.4 | 69.8 ± 8.5 | 49.1 ± 4.6 | 28.6 ± 2.1 |
| Ethanolic extract | 50.5 ± 5.9 | 75.5 ± 5.6 | 51.1 ± 4.2 | 39.6 ± 2.3 |
| Methanolic extract | 36.0 ± 5.6 | – | – | 42.5 ± 1.8 |
Cm – Cornus mas picked fresh, CmDN – Cornus mas Dary Natury, CmEH – Cornus mas Eko Herba, Ca – Cornus alba picked fresh.
IC50 values (μg·mL−1) of the extracts from different sources of fruits of Cm and Ca for the inhibition of pancreatic lipase and α-amylase.
| Pancreatic lipase IC50 ± SD [μg·mL−1] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Dried fruit | Cm | CmDN | CmEH | Ca |
| Aqueous extract | 34.2 ± 4.2 | 112 ± 18.0 | 61.4 ± 4.3 | 22.6 ± 3.0 |
| Ethanolic extract | 15.2 ± 3.9 | 57.7 ± 8.6 | 59.0 ± 9.6 | 25.3 ± 2.0 |
| Methanolic extract | 48.3 ± 12 | n.d. | n.d. | 13.4 ± 3.6 |
| Orlistat | 2.6 ± 0.5 nM (1.3 ± 0.3 ng·mL−1) | |||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Dried fruit | Cm | CmDN | CmEH | Ca |
|
| ||||
| Aqueous extract | 134 ± 6.4 | n.a. | n.a. | 136 ± 13.1 |
| Ethanolic extract | 92.5 ± 16.6 | n.a. | n.a. | 110 ± 5.6 |
| Methanolic extract | 79.0 ± 0.1 | n.d. | n.d. | 112 ± 2.3 |
| Acarbose | 3.7 ± 0.6 μM (2.4 ± 0.4 μg·mL−1) | |||
Cm – Cornus mas picked fresh, CmDN – Cornus mas Dary Natury, CmEH – Cornus mas Eko Herba, Ca – Cornus alba picked fresh; n.a. – not active (IC50 > 200 μg·mL−1), n.d. – not determined.
Statistical differences between PL IC50 values of extracts are labeled with the same letter a–d (P < 0.05):
P < 0.05 vs. Ca methanolic extract;
P < 0.05 vs. Cm ethanolic extract,
P < 0.05 vs. Ca aqueous extract,
P < 0.05 vs. Ca ethanolic extract;
P < 0.05 vs. all extracts (pancreatic lipase). Statistical differences between a-amylase IC50 values:
P < 0.05 vs. Cm methanolic extract.
Fig. 3Pancreatic lipase inhibitory activity of the methanolic extracts from Cm and Ca as well as of the obtained fractions: chloroform (CHCl3), ethyl acetate (EtOAc), butanol (BuOH) and aqueous residue. aP < 0.001 vs. the CHCl3, BuOH and aqueous fractions; bP < 0.001 vs. the CHCl3 and aqueous fractions; cP < 0.05 vs. the BuOH fraction.
Fig. 4Pancreatic lipase inhibitory activity of the ethyl acetate subfractions from Cm (CmEtOAc) and the ethyl acetate (CaEtOAc) and butanolic subfractions from Ca (CaBuOH). aP < 0.001 vs. subfractions A and B; bP < 0.001 vs. subfractions A, C and D; cP < 0.001 vs. subfractions A and D.