Literature DB >> 33802350

Improving the Reprocessing Quality of Flexible Thermolabile Endoscopes: How to Learn from Mistakes.

Beatrice Casini1, Benedetta Tuvo1, Emanuele Marciano2, Giuliana Del Magro2, Giulia Gemignani3, Grazia Luchini3, Maria Luisa Cristina4, Anna Laura Costa1, Guglielmo Arzilli1, Michele Totaro1, Angelo Baggiani1, Gaetano Privitera1.   

Abstract

Background: Failure in the reprocessing of thermolabile flexible endoscopes has been reported as one of the most important threats to patient health. Method: A case report and observational study was conducted, from August 2014 to December 2019, in the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of a University Hospital in Italy, where two cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography were observed. Following the risk/safety management practices, an epidemiological investigation was started, duodenoscopes were removed from use and the reprocessing practices reviewed. Moreover, microbiological surveillance of endoscopes was carried out according to the CDC guidelines.
Results: In the first phase of sampling, 10/10 (100%) endoscopes were found to be non-compliant, of which 7 showed results for high-concern organisms (HCOs), such as KPC-K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and E. coli. After implementing corrective actions, 12 out of 17 endoscopes were found to be non-compliant (70.5%), of which 8 showed results for HCOs, such as KPC-K. oxytoca and P. aeruginosa. During the last year of regular microbiological surveillance, only 23% of endoscopes (35/152) were found to be non-compliant, of which 7 showed results for HCOs, such as NDM-K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. The crucial issues were related to samples collected from the internal channels of duodenoscopes.
Conclusion: Managing the risk associated with the reprocessing of digestive endoscopes, through risk assessment at every stage of the process, is important for the prevention of infections associated with the use of these device.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KPC; Klebsiella pneumoniae; NDM; duodenoscope; endoscope reprocessing; microbiological surveillance

Year:  2021        PMID: 33802350      PMCID: PMC7967619          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  26 in total

1.  Guidelines of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy: recommendations for setting up cleaning and disinfection procedures in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  R Systchenko; B Marchetti; J N Canard; L Palazzo; T Ponchon; J F Rey; D Sautereau
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Assessment on experimental bacterial biofilms and in clinical practice of the efficacy of sampling solutions for microbiological testing of endoscopes.

Authors:  C Aumeran; E Thibert; F A Chapelle; C Hennequin; O Lesens; O Traoré
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid detection of intestinal carriage of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing KPC carbapenemase during an outbreak.

Authors:  T Giani; C Tascini; F Arena; I Ciullo; V Conte; A Leonildi; F Menichetti; G M Rossolini
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) - Update 2018.

Authors:  Ulrike Beilenhoff; Holger Biering; Reinhard Blum; Jadranka Brljak; Monica Cimbro; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Cesare Hassan; Michael Jung; Birgit Kampf; Christiane Neumann; Michael Pietsch; Lionel Pineau; Thierry Ponchon; Stanislav Rejchrt; Jean-François Rey; Verona Schmidt; Jayne Tillett; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 5.  Hygiene: The Looming Achilles Heel in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Michael Jung; Ulrike Beilenhoff
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-02-10

6.  A prospective study of the efficacy of routine decontamination for gastrointestinal endoscopes and the risk factors for failure.

Authors:  Linda Bisset; Yvonne E Cossart; Warwick Selby; Richard West; Denise Catterson; Kate O'hara; Karen Vickery
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 7.  Outbreaks of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections associated with duodenoscopes: What can we do to prevent infections?

Authors:  William A Rutala; David J Weber
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Synergistic activity of colistin plus rifampin against colistin-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  Carlo Tascini; Enrico Tagliaferri; Tommaso Giani; Alessandro Leonildi; Sarah Flammini; Beatrice Casini; Russell Lewis; Simone Ferranti; Gian Maria Rossolini; Francesco Menichetti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Surveillance of Endoscopes: Comparison of Different Sampling Techniques.

Authors:  Lien Cattoir; Thomas Vanzieleghem; Lisa Florin; Tania Helleputte; Martine De Vos; Bruno Verhasselt; Jerina Boelens; Isabel Leroux-Roels
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  COVID-19 Emergency Management: From the Reorganization of the Endoscopy Service to the Verification of the Reprocessing Efficacy.

Authors:  Beatrice Casini; Benedetta Tuvo; Fabrizio Maggi; Giuliana Del Magro; Alessandro Ribechini; Anna Laura Costa; Michele Totaro; Angelo Baggiani; Giulia Gemignani; Gaetano Privitera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.