Literature DB >> 16765205

A prospective study of the efficacy of routine decontamination for gastrointestinal endoscopes and the risk factors for failure.

Linda Bisset1, Yvonne E Cossart, Warwick Selby, Richard West, Denise Catterson, Kate O'hara, Karen Vickery.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-ready endoscopes were monitored over an 80-week period to determine the efficacy of decontamination procedures in a busy endoscopy center. Decontamination failure was related to patient and procedural parameters.
METHODS: Samples from patient-ready endoscopes were cultured aerobically and anaerobically and subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV. PCR to detect coliforms from 109 culture negative washes was used as a surrogate marker for biofilm in endoscopes. PCR was used to detect the presence of Helicobactor pylori in endoscopes used on infected patients. Procedural information such as biopsy retrieval, endoscope number, diagnosis, attending personnel, and decontamination system procedures was collected.
RESULTS: Gastroscopes (n = 1,376) and colonoscopes (n = 987) were equally contaminated (1.8% vs 1.9%, respectively) with low numbers of organisms commonly isolated from the nasopharynx and/or feces. Only 1 wash contained viral nucleic acid (HCV). There was a significant correlation (P < .001) between the number of times a patient-ready endoscope was contaminated and its frequency of use. Colonoscopes used on patients with gastrointestinal disease were significantly more likely to remain contaminated through the decontamination process (P < .05). All other patient, staff, and decontamination system parameters remained not statistically significant. Coliform DNA was detected in 40% of culture-negative washes collected from patient-ready endoscopes, suggesting the presence of biofilm. No H pylori DNA was detected.
CONCLUSION: Recommended decontamination procedures do not entirely eliminate persistence of low numbers of organisms on a few endoscopes, but this is unlikely to cause serious consequences in patients. Bacterial biofilm is difficult to remove and may explain this low-level persistence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16765205     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  15 in total

1.  Swab culture monitoring of automated endoscope reprocessors after high-level disinfection.

Authors:  Lung-Sheng Lu; Keng-Liang Wu; Yi-Chun Chiu; Ming-Tzung Lin; Tsung-Hui Hu; King-Wah Chiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

3.  Analysis of a panel of rapidly growing mycobacteria for resistance to aldehyde-based disinfectants.

Authors:  Mary Ann De Groote; Sara Gibbs; Vinicius Calado Nogueira de Moura; Winona Burgess; Kris Richardson; Shannon Kasperbauer; Nancy Madinger; Mary Jackson
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor (ECR) simulated-use and clinical-use evaluation of cleaning efficacy.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Pat DeGagne; Nancy Olson; Iram Fatima
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Infectious transmission from Savary dilators is uncommon: retrospective review from a large tertiary academic center.

Authors:  Zoe N Memel; Duncan J Flynn; Yasmin Hernandez-Barco; Kavel Harish Visrodia; Brenna Casey; Kumar Krishnan
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-06-29

6.  Residual bioburden in reprocessed side-view endoscopes used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  D L N L Ubhayawardana; J Kottahachchi; M M Weerasekera; I W M P Wanigasooriya; S S N Fernando; M De Silva
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2013-12

Review 7.  Infectious diseases linked to cross-contamination of flexible endoscopes.

Authors:  Nikki Kenters; Elisabeth G W Huijskens; Corianne Meier; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-08

Review 8.  Endoscope Reprocessing: Update on Controversial Issues.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Choi; Young-Seok Cho
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30

9.  Sterile Reverse Osmosis Water Combined with Friction Are Optimal for Channel and Lever Cavity Sample Collection of Flexible Duodenoscopes.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Harminder Singh; Zoann Nugent; Donald Duerksen; Gale Schultz; Carol Reidy; Patricia DeGagne; Nancy Olson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-11-07

10.  Modeling microbial survival in buildup biofilm for complex medical devices.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Rosemarie Howie
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.