Literature DB >> 12678942

Otoacoustic emissions in industrial hearing loss assessment.

Mariola Sliwinska-Kowalska1, Piotr Kotylo.   

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are a sensitive and frequency-specific tool for assessing cochlear damage. Parameters of an OAE signal decrease at the frequency that approximately corresponds with the injured region. However, damage in the basal turn of the cochlea is important for signal processing and OAE generation in the higher cochlear partition. In workers exposed to noise, the amplitude of OAEs decreases at the frequencies characteristic for acoustic trauma. These changes may occur prior to the audiometric threshold shift, which supports the superiority of OAEs in early detection of noise-induced damage. Therefore, OAEs may be applied as a quantitative test for individual assessment and monitoring of industrial hearing loss. Otoacoustic emissions are an established screening tool in the examination of newborn and infant hearing. In addition, studies on adult patients demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity if applied in screening sensorineural hearing loss, especially with multivariate analyses engaged. OAEs may be used as a screening test in subjects with an increased risk of exposure to noise and in epidemiological studies on industrial and environmental noise effects. Although otoacoustic emissions have a remarkable advantage in the evaluation of industrial hearing loss, there are some doubts about their utility in hearing conservation programs. The legislation and financial compensation associated with the diagnosis of occupational illness are based on the quantitative "gold standard", pure-tone audiometry. In addition, as it is not possible to reproduce the audiogram precisely, the OAEs may not be currently applied as a reliable test of hearing loss in malingerers. However, in some countries where tinnitus is eligible for compensation, OAEs may indeed appear helpful in the reliable diagnosis of cochlear damage within the respective frequency range.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 12678942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noise Health        ISSN: 1463-1741            Impact factor:   0.867


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  [Pronounced bilateral mesocochlear hearing impairment from 40-45 dB in spite of regular TEOAE, DPOAE and inconspicuous click-BERA].

Authors:  C Kothe; S Fleischer; M Blank; M Hess
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Non-depressed Essential Tremor Cases and Controls: A Clinical and Audiometric Study.

Authors:  Nesrin Helvaci Yilmaz; Muhittin Cenk Akbostanci; Nurhan Yılmaz
Journal:  Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y)       Date:  2015-01-29

4.  The Immediate and Long-Term Impact of Military Aircraft Noise on Hearing: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Fighter Pilots and Ground Staff.

Authors:  Chao-Yin Kuo; Chia-Lien Hung; Hsin-Chien Chen; Cheng-Ping Shih; Rou-Huei Lu; Chen-Wai Chen; Li-Wen Hung; Yi-Chun Lin; Hang-Kang Chen; Da-Ming Chu; Yuan-Yung Lin; Yueh-Chun Chen; Chih-Hung Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Decreased Speech-In-Noise Understanding in Young Adults with Tinnitus.

Authors:  Annick Gilles; Winny Schlee; Sarah Rabau; Kristien Wouters; Erik Fransen; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Threshold Equalizing Noise Test Reveals Suprathreshold Loss of Hearing Function, Even in the "Normal" Audiogram Range.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Emanuele Perugia; Warren Bakay; Melanie Lough; Helen Whiston; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.