| Literature DB >> 33796338 |
Dana M Hutchison1, Amir A Hakimi1, Avin Wijayaweera1, Soohong Seo2, Ellen M Hong1, Tiffany T Pham1, Melissa Bircan1, Ryan Sivoraphonh1, Brandyn Dunn3, Mark R Kobayashi4, Sehwan Kim5, Brian Jf Wong1,3,6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Scar treatments aim to address pathologic collagen deposition; however, they can be expensive or difficult to control. Electrochemical therapy (ECT) offers a simple alternative treatment. The purpose of this study is to examine the acid-base and histological changes in ex vivo human abdominal skin following ECT.Entities:
Keywords: Electrochemical therapy; collagen; in situ drug therapy; skin
Year: 2021 PMID: 33796338 PMCID: PMC7970177 DOI: 10.1177/2059513120988532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scars Burn Heal ISSN: 2059-5131
Figure 1.Hypothesised model of electrochemical therapy reaction within ex vivo human skin. (a) Insertion of electrodes into dermis with application of electrical potential converts electrical energy to chemical energy, generating hydrogen and hydroxide ions. (b) Triple helical structure of collagen fibers and (c) molecular structure of collagen stabilised by hydrogen bonds. (d) Proposed mechanism of electrochemical therapy, including alteration of hydrogen bonding and subsequent triple helical structure, and (e) nucleic acid and protein degradation. Original image.
Figure 2.Experiment design. (a) Electrodes inserted into composite specimen held by three-dimensional printed jig on Styrofoam block. (b) Ex vivo human tissue. (c) Saline injected into tissue to achieve tumescence. (d) Electrodes inserted into tumesced tissue.
Figure 3.Effect of electrochemical therapy on composite human dermis with increasing voltage (V) and constant time (5 min), visualised as pH perturbation in hemisected samples. Samples are oriented with the surface of insertion site (epidermis) along the bottom. Alteration of pH is seen as color change at anode (red) and cathode (blue) sites. Universal pH indicator included for reference. Scale = 0.5 cm.
Figure 4.Effect of electrochemical therapy (mm) on human abdominal dermis at constant time (5 min) and increasing voltage (3V-5 min: n = 7, 4V-5 min: n = 10, 5V-5 min: n = 11, 6V-5 min: n = 8). There was a significantly greater width of pH change at the cathode compared to the anode in all treatment groups (P < 0.05).
t-test results comparing mean ECT effect (mm) at anode and cathode for each treatment voltage.
| Treatment | Mean width (mm) | SD | n (%) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Anode | 0 | 0 | 6 (14.3) | – | – |
| Cathode | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 3V-5min | Anode | 0.504 | 0.3 | 7 (16.7) | –2.45 | 0.031 |
| Cathode | 1.729 | 1.3 | ||||
| 4V-5min | Anode | 1.339 | 0.7 | 10 (23.8) | –5.31 | <0.001 |
| Cathode | 2.542 | 0.3 | ||||
| 5V-5min | Anode | 1.419 | 0.9 | 11 (26.2) | –3.28 | 0.004 |
| Cathode | 2.712 | 1.0 | ||||
| 6V-5min | Anode | 2.056 | 0.8 | 8 (19.0) | –3.56 | 0.003 |
| Cathode | 3.746 | 1.1 | ||||
denotes statistical significance.
ECT, electrochemical therapy; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 5.H&E staining of dermis. ECT was performed at increasing voltage over a constant duration of 5 min. Representative microscopic fields of untreated control (a, f); anode sites of 3V-5min (b), 4V-5min (c), 5V-5min (d), 6V-5min (e); and cathode sites of 3V-5min (g), 4V-5min (h), 5V-5min (i), and 6V-5min (j) are depicted. Images are shown at 2× magnification. ECT, electrochemical therapy; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.