Literature DB >> 16884126

Implementing Six Sigma in The Netherlands.

Jaap van den Heuvel1, Ronald J M M Does, Ad J J C Bogers, Marc Berg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Six Sigma, a process-focused strategy and methodology for business improvement, can be used to improve care processes, eliminate waste, reduce costs, and enhance patient satisfaction. EXPERIENCE WITH SIX SIGMA IN THE NETHERLANDS: Six Sigma was introduced in 2001 at the 384-bed Red Cross Hospital (Beverwijk). During the Green Belt training, every participant was required to participate in at least one Six Sigma project. The hospital's total savings in 2004 amounted to 1.4 million dollars, for an average savings of 67,000 dollars for each of the completed 21 projects. THREE EXAMPLES OF SUCCESSFUL PROJECTS: In one project, the team designed a new admission process for the operating rooms, resulting in an average starting time nine minutes earlier. This relatively minor improvement made it possible to operate on an additional 400 patients a year and to achieve a net savings of >273,000 dollars. A second project reduced the number of patients receiving intravenous (IV) antibiotics by switching to oral administration, yielding annual savings, based on medication costs alone, of >75,000 dollars. A third project reduced the length of stay in the delivery room from 11.9 to 3.4 hours, yielding an annual savings of 68,000 dollars. The "Ultimate Cure?": Six Sigma, which entails involvement of health care workers; use of improvement tools (from industry); creation of trained project teams to tackle complex, often cross-departmental processes; data analyses; and investment in quality improvement may prove the "ultimate cure" to the current cost, quality, and safety issues that challenge health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16884126     DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32051-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  7 in total

1.  Can we apply the process improvement tool Six Sigma to enhance outcomes in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery?

Authors:  Parul J Shukla; Savio G Barreto
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Towards an organisation-wide process-oriented organisation of care: a literature review.

Authors:  Leti Vos; Sarah E Chalmers; Michel La Dückers; Peter P Groenewegen; Cordula Wagner; Godefridus G van Merode
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  The impact of health information technologies on quality improvement methodologies' efficiency, throughput and financial outcomes: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Raed H AlHazme; Syed S Haque; Hal Wiggin; Arif M Rana
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  An Overview of the Performance Improvement Initiatives by the Ministry of Health in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mazen Hassanain
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 5.  Systematic Review of Interventions to Reduce Operating Time in Lung Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Paulien C Hoefsmit; Robert J Cerfolio; Ralph de Vries; Max Dahele; H Reinier Zandbergen
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2021-02-01

6.  Lessons learned on the experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored VBHC model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses.

Authors:  Dane Lansdaal; Femke van Nassau; Marije van der Steen; Martine de Bruijne; Marian Smeulers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review.

Authors:  S'thembile Thusini; Maria Milenova; Noushig Nahabedian; Barbara Grey; Tayana Soukup; Claire Henderson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.908

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.