Blake C Alkire1, Nakul P Raykar2, Mark G Shrime3, Thomas G Weiser4, Stephen W Bickler5, John A Rose6, Cameron T Nutt7, Sarah L M Greenberg8, Meera Kotagal9, Johanna N Riesel10, Micaela Esquivel4, Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz4, George Molina11, Nobhojit Roy12, John G Meara13, Paul E Farmer14. 1. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, USA. 2. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA. Electronic address: nraykar@bidmc.harvard.edu. 3. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Office of Global Surgery and Health, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA. 5. Rudy Children's Hospital, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. 7. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. 8. Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA; Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, USA. 9. Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. 10. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. 11. Ariadne Labs, Boston, USA; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. 12. Department of Surgery, BARC Hospital, Mumbai, India; Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 13. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, USA. 14. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA; Partners-In-Health, Boston, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: More than 2 billion people are unable to receive surgical care based on operating theatre density alone. The vision of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery is universal access to safe, affordable surgical and anaesthesia care when needed. We aimed to estimate the number of individuals worldwide without access to surgical services as defined by the Commission's vision. METHODS: We modelled access to surgical services in 196 countries with respect to four dimensions: timeliness, surgical capacity, safety, and affordability. We built a chance tree for each country to model the probability of surgical access with respect to each dimension, and from this we constructed a statistical model to estimate the proportion of the population in each country that does not have access to surgical services. We accounted for uncertainty with one-way sensitivity analyses, multiple imputation for missing data, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. FINDINGS: At least 4·8 billion people (95% posterior credible interval 4·6-5·0 [67%, 64-70]) of the world's population do not have access to surgery. The proportion of the population without access varied widely when stratified by epidemiological region: greater than 95% of the population in south Asia and central, eastern, and western sub-Saharan Africa do not have access to care, whereas less than 5% of the population in Australasia, high-income North America, and western Europe lack access. INTERPRETATION: Most of the world's population does not have access to surgical care, and access is inequitably distributed. The near absence of access in many low-income and middle-income countries represents a crisis, and as the global health community continues to support the advancement of universal health coverage, increasing access to surgical services will play a central role in ensuring health care for all. FUNDING: None.
BACKGROUND: More than 2 billion people are unable to receive surgical care based on operating theatre density alone. The vision of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery is universal access to safe, affordable surgical and anaesthesia care when needed. We aimed to estimate the number of individuals worldwide without access to surgical services as defined by the Commission's vision. METHODS: We modelled access to surgical services in 196 countries with respect to four dimensions: timeliness, surgical capacity, safety, and affordability. We built a chance tree for each country to model the probability of surgical access with respect to each dimension, and from this we constructed a statistical model to estimate the proportion of the population in each country that does not have access to surgical services. We accounted for uncertainty with one-way sensitivity analyses, multiple imputation for missing data, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. FINDINGS: At least 4·8 billion people (95% posterior credible interval 4·6-5·0 [67%, 64-70]) of the world's population do not have access to surgery. The proportion of the population without access varied widely when stratified by epidemiological region: greater than 95% of the population in south Asia and central, eastern, and western sub-Saharan Africa do not have access to care, whereas less than 5% of the population in Australasia, high-income North America, and western Europe lack access. INTERPRETATION: Most of the world's population does not have access to surgical care, and access is inequitably distributed. The near absence of access in many low-income and middle-income countries represents a crisis, and as the global health community continues to support the advancement of universal health coverage, increasing access to surgical services will play a central role in ensuring health care for all. FUNDING: None.
Authors: Thomas G Weiser; Alex B Haynes; George Molina; Stuart R Lipsitz; Micaela M Esquivel; Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz; Rui Fu; Tej Azad; Tiffany E Chao; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-04-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Nakul P Raykar; Rachel R Yorlets; Charles Liu; Sarah L M Greenberg; Meera Kotagal; Roberta Goldman; Nobhojit Roy; John G Meara; Rowan D Gillies Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-04-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Stefan Jochberger; Feruza Ismailova; Wolfgang Lederer; Viktoria D Mayr; Günter Luckner; Volker Wenzel; Hanno Ulmer; Walter R Hasibeder; Martin W Dünser Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Thomas G Weiser; Scott E Regenbogen; Katherine D Thompson; Alex B Haynes; Stuart R Lipsitz; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-06-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: John Rose; Thomas G Weiser; Phil Hider; Leona Wilson; Russell L Gruen; Stephen W Bickler Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Marie Crandall; Douglas Sharp; Erin Unger; David Straus; Karen Brasel; Renee Hsia; Thomas Esposito Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: T K Timmers; E Kortekaas; Bpc Beyer; E Huizinga; S M V Hezik van; E Twagirayezu; M Bemelman Journal: Afr Health Sci Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 0.927
Authors: Allison Silverstein; Ainhoa Costas-Chavarri; Mussa R Gakwaya; Joseph Lule; Swagoto Mukhopadhyay; John G Meara; Mark G Shrime Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Charles A Coventry; Ashish I Vaska; Andrew J A Holland; David J Read; Rebecca Q Ivers Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.352