| Literature DB >> 33795781 |
Jinzhou Zhu1, Xiyuan Zhang2, Jialin Niu2, Yongjuan Shi2, Zhengbin Zhu1, Daopeng Dai1, Chenxin Chen2, Jia Pei2, Guangyin Yuan3, Ruiyan Zhang4.
Abstract
Although the drug-eluting stent (DES) has become the standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-based revascularization, concerns remain regarding the use of DES, mainly due to its permanent rigid constraint to vessels. A drug-eluting bioresorbable stent (BRS) was thus developed as an alternative to DES, which can be absorbed entirely after its therapeutic period. Magnesium (Mg)-based BRSs have attracted a great deal of attention due to their suitable mechanical properties, innovative chemical features, and well-proven biocompatibility. However, the primary disadvantage of Mg-based BRSs is the rapid degradation rate, resulting in the early loss of structural support long before the recovery of vascular function. Recently, a new type of patented Mg-Nd-Zn-Zr alloy (JDBM) was developed at Shanghai Jiao Tong University to reduce the degradation rate compared to commercial Mg alloys. In the present investigation, a poly(D,L-lactic acid)-coated and rapamycin eluting (PDLLA/RAPA) JDBM BRS was prepared, and its biosafety and efficacy for coronary artery stenosis were evaluated via in vitro and in vivo experiments. The degree of smooth muscle cell adhesion to the PDLLA/RAPA coated alloy and the rapamycin pharmacokinetics of JDBM BRS were first assessed in vitro. JDBM BRS and commercial DES FIREHAWK were then implanted in the coronary arteries of a porcine model. Neointimal hyperplasia was evaluated at 30, 90, and 180 days, and re-endothelialization was evaluated at 30 days. Furthermore, Micro-CT and optical coherence tomography (OCT) analyses were performed 180 days after stent implantation to evaluate the technical feasibility, biocompatibility, and degradation characteristics of JDBM BRS in vivo. The results show the ability of a PDLLA/RAPA coated JDBM to inhibit smooth muscle cell adhesion and moderate the drug release rate of JDBM BRS in vitro. In vivo, low local and systemic risks of JDBM BRS were demonstrated in the porcine model, with preserved mechanical integrity after 6 months of implantation. We also showed that this novel BRS was associated with a similar efficacy profile compared with standard DES and high anti-restenosis performance. These findings may confer long term advantages for using this BRS over a traditional DES.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33795781 PMCID: PMC8016955 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86803-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The adhesion morphologies of A7r5 cells on HF-JDBM, PDLLA coated JDBM, PDLLA/RAPA coated JDBM, and negative control (NC) for 1 and 3 days (Stained with Calcein-AM, and green signals represent live cells).
Figure 2Statistics of A7r5 cell densities on various samples (Five fields are counted for each group and the results are presented as mean ± SD).
Figure 3Drug release kinetic profiles of JDBM BRS and SS BRS.
Minimal lumen diameter of stented coronary artery segments measured by quantitative coronary angiographic (QCA).
| FIREHAWK | JDBM BRS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-procedure, n | 4 | 4 | |
| Reference vessel diameter, mm | 2.63 ± 0.04 | 2.61 ± 0.05 | 0.6523 |
| Minimal luminal diameter, mm | 2.60 ± 0.08 | 2.56 ± 0.07 | 0.6443 |
| 30 day follow-up, n | 4 | 4 | |
| Minimal lumen diameter, mm | 2.49 ± 0.13 | 2.40 ± 0.15 | 0.4577 |
| 90 day follow-up, n | 4 | 4 | |
| Minimal lumen diameter, mm | 2.33 ± 0.15 | 2.18 ± 0.23 | 0.3455 |
| 180 day follow-up, n | 4 | 4 | |
| Minimal lumen diameter, mm | 2.13 ± 0.11 | 2.01 ± 0.25 | 0.2165 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. n: number of stented arterial segments.
Figure 4Representative OCT images of JDBM BRS and FIREHAWK stent in the porcine coronary artery at day 180 after stent implantation.
OCT findings by cross section level.
| FIREHAWK (n = 4) | JDBM BRS (n = 4) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MLA (mm2) | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 6.2 ± 0.2 | 0.470 |
| MSA (mm2) | 7.7 ± 0.5 | 7.4 ± 0.3 | 0.499 |
| NIA (mm2) | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.809 |
| Uncovered CS (%) | 3.7 ± 1.3 | 4.4 ± 1.4 | 0.603 |
| Malapposed CS (%) | 0.8 ± 0.8 | 1.5 ± 1.0 | 0.436 |
| Thrombus, n (%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | – |
| NV (%) | 7.5 | 10.0 | 0.750 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. CS, cross section; MLA, mean lumen area; MSA, mean stent area; NIA, neointimal area; NV, neovascularization.
Figure 5Micro-CT results of residual JDBM BRS at 30, 90, and 180 days post implantation. The stent still maintained good integrity at 30 days. Though some struts had transferred from the metal to degradation products, the main structure of the JDBM BRS stent remained intact at 90 and 180 days. The raw image data were reconstructed using the NRecon software V1.4.4.
Figure 6SEM images of JDBM BRS vs. FIREHAWK in the porcine coronary artery at 30 days post implantation.
Morphometry comparisons.
| FIREHAWK | JDBM BRS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 day follow-up, n | 4 | 4 | |
| Injury score | 1.53 ± 0.11 | 1.57 ± 0.14 | 0.6776 |
| Mean LA, mm2 | 4.56 ± 0.45 | 4.46 ± 0.63 | 0.6567 |
| Mean IEM, mm2 | 5.67 ± 0.57 | 5.74 ± 0.77 | 0.5456 |
| Mean NA, mm2 | 1.13 ± 0.44 | 1.35 ± 0.76 | 0.4477 |
| Mean NT, mm | 0.31 ± 0.09 | 0.45 ± 0.11 | 0.4876 |
| Percent area stenosis, % | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.07 | 0.3676 |
| Inflammation score | 1.02 ± 0.14 | 1.15 ± 0.28 | 0.3577 |
| 90 day follow-up, n | 4 | 4 | |
| Injury score | 2.04 ± 0.32 | 2.37 ± 0.44 | 0.6356 |
| Mean LA, mm2 | 3.96 ± 0.45 | 3.75 ± 0.73 | 0.4567 |
| Mean IEM, mm2 | 5.99 ± 0.88 | 5.84 ± 0.77 | 0.6657 |
| Mean NA, mm2 | 1.96 ± 0.95 | 2.08 ± 1.11 | 0.3234 |
| Mean NT, mm | 0.51 ± 0.15 | 0.70 ± 0.23 | 0.3823 |
| Percent area stenosis, % | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 0.20 ± 0.08 | 0.3467 |
| Inflammation score | 0.89 ± 0.15 | 1.07 ± 0.28 | 0.2122 |
| 180 day follow-up, n | 4 | 4 | |
| Injury score | 2.13 ± 0.31 | 2.39 ± 0.54 | 0.6745 |
| Mean LA, mm2 | 3.66 ± 0.77 | 3.36 ± 0.73 | 0.3562 |
| Mean IEM, mm2 | 6.38 ± 1.14 | 6.26 ± 1.57 | 0.3245 |
| Mean NA, mm2 | 2.66 ± 0.83 | 2.86 ± 1.16 | 0.3649 |
| Mean NT, mm | 0.73 ± 0.21 | 0.92 ± 0.35 | 0.2556 |
| Percent area stenosis, % | 0.24 ± 0.05 | 0.29 ± 0.12 | 0.2345 |
| Inflammation score | 0.67 ± 0.23 | 0.87 ± 0.38 | 0.2187 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
LA: average lumen area; IEM: average internal elastic membrane area; NA: average neointimal area; NT: average neointimal thickness; n: number of sections.
Figure 7Representative histological images of JDBM BRS and FIREHAWK groups after implanted into porcine arteries for 30, 90, and 180 days. Sections are stained with Masson.