| Literature DB >> 33791229 |
Susan Realegeno1, Kevin Ward1, Omai B Garner1, Shangxin Yang1.
Abstract
Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) frequently causes hospital-acquired infections and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. CRKP can have multiple resistance mechanisms and only a few can be routinely detected by commercial molecular or phenotypic assays making surveillance for CRKP particularly challenging. In this report, we identified and characterized an unusual non-carbapenemase-producing CRKP carrying a rare plasmid-borne inducible AmpC gene, blaDHA-1 . The isolate was recovered from blood culture of a 67-year-old female presenting with sepsis post bladder surgery and ureteral stent removal. The primary isolate displayed an indeterminate susceptibility pattern for ceftriaxone by broth microdilution, but was susceptible by disk diffusion with one colony growing within the zone of inhibition. The ceftriaxone resistant colony was sub-cultured and had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 ug/ml for imipenem (intermediate) and a zone size of 18 mm for ertapenem (resistant), but remained susceptible to cefepime and meropenem. Further phenotypic characterization of this sub-cultured isolate showed carbapenemase activity. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) revealed the presence of two subpopulations of a K. pneumoniae (MLST sequence type 11) from the primary blood culture isolate: one pan-susceptible to beta-lactams tested and the other resistant to the 3rd generation cephalosporins and ertapenem. WGS analysis identified the resistant K. pneumoniae harboring IncFIB(K) and IncR plasmids and the presence of plasmid-borne beta-lactam resistance genes bla OXA-1 and bla DHA-1, an inducible AmpC gene. Additional resistance genes against quinolones (aac(6')-Ib-cr, oqxA, oqB), aminoglycoside (aph(3')-Ia), sulfonamide (sul1), and tetracycline (tet(A)) were also identified. DHA-1 positive K. pneumoniae have been previously identified outside the US, particularly in Asia and Europe, but limited cases have been reported in the United States and may be underrecognized. Our study highlights the importance of using both extended phenotypic testing and WGS to identify emerging resistance mechanisms in clinical Enterobacterales isolates with unusual antimicrobial resistance patterns.Entities:
Keywords: DHA-1; Klebsiella pneumoniae; carbapenem resistance; plasmid-mediated AmpC; whole-genome sequence analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33791229 PMCID: PMC8006929 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.561880
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Patient Clinical Course. Significant events are noted under each hospitalization day, including procedures, symptoms, and antibiotics course. AST, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results.
| Antibiotic Class | Antibiotic | Isolate 10 | Isolate 1A | Isolate 1B | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMD | DD | BMD | DD | BMD | DD | ||||||||
| Beta-lactam | Ampicillin-Sulbactam | 8 | S | >32 | R | ||||||||
| Amoxicillin-Clavulanate | 4 | S | >32 | R | |||||||||
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | 64 | I | 18 | I | ≤8 | S | 25 | S | >128 | R | 6 | R | |
| Cefazolin | >32 | R | 6 | R | 2 | S | 23 | S | >32 | R | 6 | R | |
| Cefoxitin | 6 | R | 19 | S | 6 | R | |||||||
| Ceftriaxone | Indeterminate | 25 | S | ≤1 | S | 30 | S | 64 | R | 10 | R | ||
| Cefotaxime | 24 | S | 31 | S | 6 | R | |||||||
| Ceftazidime | 16 | R | 18 | I | ≤0.5 | S | 28 | S | >32 | R | 6 | R | |
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | ≤2 | S | ≤2 | S | ≤ 2 | S | |||||||
| Ceftolozane-Tazobactam | ≤0.5 | S | ≤0.5 | S | >32 | R | |||||||
| Cefepime | ≤0.5 | S | 26 | S | ≤0.5 | S | 32 | S | ≤ 0.5 | S | 24 | SDD | |
| Aztreonam | ≤0.5 | S | >32 | R | |||||||||
| Ertapenem | ≤0.25 | S | 20 | I | ≤0.25 | S | 30 | S | 0.5 | S | 18 | R | |
| Imipenem | 1 | S | 24 | S | ≤0.25 | S | 26 | S | 2 | I | 26 | S | |
| Meropenem | ≤0.25 | S | 25 | S | ≤0.25 | S | 29 | S | ≤0.25 | S | 26 | S | |
| Meropenem-Vabrobactam | ≤0.6 | S | ≤0.6 | S | |||||||||
| Aminoglycosides | Amikacin | ≤4 | S | 23 | S | ≤4 | S | 26 | S | ≤4 | S | 23 | S |
| Gentamicin | ≤1 | S | 22 | S | ≤1 | S | 26 | S | 1 | S | 23 | S | |
| Tobramycin | 4 | S | 25 | S | ≤1 | S | 24 | S | 4 | S | 14 | I | |
| Streptomycin | S | S | |||||||||||
| Macrolides | Azithromycin | 16 | S | >32 | R | ||||||||
| Tetracyclines | Minocycline | 2 | S | 8 | I | ||||||||
| Tigecycline | 0.5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Fluroquinolones | Ciprofloxacin | >4 | R | 6 | R | >4 | R | 6 | R | >4 | R | 6 | R |
| Levofloxacin | >4 | R | >8 | R | >8 | R | |||||||
| Moxifloxacin | >8 | >8 | |||||||||||
| Polymixins | Colistin | ≤2 | WT | ≤2 | WT | ≤2 | WT | ||||||
| Folate Pathway antagonists | Trimethaprim/Sulfamethoazole | ≤1/20 | S | 12 | I | ≤1/20 | S | 14 | I | ≤1/20 | S | 6 | R |
Broth microdilution (BMD) MIC reported in µg/ml; Disk Diffusion (DD) zone size reported in mm; R, Resistant; I, Intermediate; S, Sensitive, SDD, Susceptible-dose dependent.
Figure 2Isolate 1B was cultured in the presence of an imipenem disk (left) placed adjacent to a cefotaxime disk (right) (A) and a cefoxitin disk (left) placed adjacent to a cefotaxime disk (right) (B). Isolate 1A was cultured in the presence of an imipenem disk (left) placed adjacent to a cefotaxime disk (right) (C) and a cefoxitin disk (left) placed adjacent to a cefotaxime disk (right) (D).
Resistance genes identified by WGS.
| Antibiotic Class Targeted | AMR Gene | Isolate 10 | Isolate 1A | Isolate 1B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-lactam | blaDHA-1 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| blaOXA-1 | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| blaSHV-182 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Aminoglycoside | aac(6 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| aph(3 | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Folate Pathway | sul1 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Quinolone | aac(6 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| oqxA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| oqxB | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| qnrB4 | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Rifamycins | arr-3 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Tetracycline | tet(A) | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Phenicol | catB3 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Macrolide | mph(A) | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Fosfomycin | fosA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| IncFIB(K) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| IncR | ✓ | ✓ |