Literature DB >> 33786503

Patient-Derived Xenografts as an Innovative Surrogate Tumor Model for the Investigation of Health Disparities in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Margarite D Matossian1, Alexandra A Giardina2, Maryl K Wright1, Steven Elliott1, Michelle M Loch3, Khoa Nguyen1, Arnold H Zea2,4, Frank H Lau5, Krzysztof Moroz2,6, Adam I Riker5,7, Steven D Jones8, Elizabeth C Martin9, Bruce A Bunnell10, Lucio Miele4, Bridgette M Collins-Burow1, Matthew E Burow1,10.   

Abstract

Despite a decline in overall incidence rates for cancer in the past decade, due in part to impressive advancements in both diagnosis and treatment, breast cancer (BC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. BC alone accounts for ∼30% of all new cancer diagnoses in women worldwide. Triple-negative BC (TNBC), defined as having no expression of the estrogen or progesterone receptors and no amplification of the HER2 receptor, is a subtype of BC that does not benefit from the use of estrogen receptor-targeting or HER2-targeting therapies. Differences in socioeconomic factors and cell intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics have been demonstrated in Black and White TNBC patient tumors. The emergence of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models as a surrogate, translational, and functional representation of the patient with TNBC has led to the advances in drug discovery and testing of novel targeted approaches and combination therapies. However, current established TNBC PDX models fail to represent the diverse patient population and, most importantly, the specific ethnic patient populations that have higher rates of incidence and mortality. The primary aim of this review is to emphasize the importance of using clinically relevant translatable tumor models that reflect TNBC human tumor biology and heterogeneity in high-risk patient populations. The focus is to highlight the complexity of BC as it specifically relates to the management of TNBC in Black women. We discuss the importance of utilizing PDX models to study the extracellular matrix (ECM), and the distinct differences in ECM composition and biophysical properties in Black and White women. Finally, we demonstrate the crucial importance of PDX models toward novel drug discovery in this patient population. © Margarite D. Matossian et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African ancestry; extracellular matrix; health disparities; metastasis; patient-derived xenograft; triple-negative breast cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 33786503      PMCID: PMC7784803          DOI: 10.1089/whr.2020.0037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2688-4844


  79 in total

Review 1.  Obesity and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Disparities, Controversies, and Biology.

Authors:  Eric C Dietze; Tanya A Chavez; Victoria L Seewaldt
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Extracellular matrix remodeling in 3D: implications in tissue homeostasis and disease progression.

Authors:  Andrew J Ford; Padmavathy Rajagopalan
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-11-23

Review 3.  Role of the tumor microenvironment in tumor progression and the clinical applications (Review).

Authors:  Yao Yuan; Yu-Chen Jiang; Chong-Kui Sun; Qian-Ming Chen
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  From transformation to metastasis: deconstructing the extracellular matrix in breast cancer.

Authors:  Shelly Kaushik; Michael W Pickup; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 9.264

5.  Patient-derived Models Reveal Impact of the Tumor Microenvironment on Therapeutic Response.

Authors:  Ayesha A Shafi; Matthew J Schiewer; Renée de Leeuw; Emanuela Dylgjeri; Peter A McCue; Neelima Shah; Leonard G Gomella; Costas D Lallas; Edouard J Trabulsi; Margaret M Centenera; Theresa E Hickey; Lisa M Butler; Ganesh Raj; Wayne D Tilley; Edna Cukierman; Karen E Knudsen
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-06-06

6.  Features of triple-negative breast cancer: Analysis of 38,813 cases from the national cancer database.

Authors:  Magdalena L Plasilova; Brandon Hayse; Brigid K Killelea; Nina R Horowitz; Anees B Chagpar; Donald R Lannin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Rising global burden of breast cancer: the case of sub-Saharan Africa (with emphasis on Nigeria) and implications for regional development: a review.

Authors:  Samuel O Azubuike; Colin Muirhead; Louise Hayes; Richard McNally
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Obesity-induced MBD2_v2 expression promotes tumor-initiating triple-negative breast cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Emily A Teslow; Cristina Mitrea; Bin Bao; Ramzi M Mohammad; Lisa A Polin; Greg Dyson; Kristen S Purrington; Aliccia Bollig-Fischer
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  Differences in the tumor microenvironment between African-American and European-American breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Damali N Martin; Brenda J Boersma; Ming Yi; Mark Reimers; Tiffany M Howe; Harry G Yfantis; Yien Che Tsai; Erica H Williams; Dong H Lee; Robert M Stephens; Allan M Weissman; Stefan Ambs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Breast cancer cell lines: friend or foe?

Authors:  Sarah E Burdall; Andrew M Hanby; Mark R J Lansdown; Valerie Speirs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-02-03       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.