Ayesha A Shafi1, Matthew J Schiewer1, Renée de Leeuw1, Emanuela Dylgjeri1, Peter A McCue1, Neelima Shah2, Leonard G Gomella1,3, Costas D Lallas1,3, Edouard J Trabulsi1,3, Margaret M Centenera4,5, Theresa E Hickey4, Lisa M Butler4,5, Ganesh Raj6, Wayne D Tilley4, Edna Cukierman2, Karen E Knudsen1,3,7. 1. Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Cancer Biology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Prostate Cancer Research Centre and Freemason's Foundation Centre for Men's Health, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 5. South Australian Health and Medician Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia. 6. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 7. Departments of Cancer Biology and Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy is a first-line treatment for disseminated prostate cancer (PCa). However, virtually all tumors become resistant and recur as castration-resistant PCa, which has no durable cure. One major hurdle in the development of more effective therapies is the lack of preclinical models that adequately recapitulate the heterogeneity of PCa, significantly hindering the ability to accurately predict therapeutic response. OBJECTIVE: To leverage the ex vivo culture method termed patient-derived explant (PDE) to examine the impact of PCa therapeutics on a patient-by-patient basis. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Fresh PCa tissue from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy was cultured as PDEs to examine therapeutic response. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The impact of genomic and chemical perturbations in PDEs was assessed using various parameters (eg, AR levels, Ki67 staining, and desmoplastic indices). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: PDE maintained the integrity of the native tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor tissue morphology, viability, and endogenous hormone signaling. Tumor cells in this model system exhibited de novo proliferative capacity. Examination of the native TME in the PDE revealed a first-in-field insight into patient-specific desmoplastic stromal indices and predicted responsiveness to AR-directed therapeutics. CONCLUSIONS: The PDE model allows for a comprehensive evaluation of individual tumors in their native TME to ultimately develop more effective therapeutic regimens tailored to individuals. Discernment of novel stromal markers may provide a basis for applying precision medicine in treating advanced PCa, which would have a transformative effect on patient outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, an innovative model system was used to more effectively mimic human disease. The patient-derived explant (PDE) system can be used to predict therapeutic response and identify novel targets in advanced disease. Thus, the PDE will be an asset for the development of novel metrics for the implementation of precision medicine in prostate cancer.The patient-derived explant (PDE) model allows for a comprehensive evaluation of individual human tumors in their native tumor microenvironment (TME). TME analysis revealed first-in-field insight into predicted tumor responsiveness to AR-directed therapeutics through evaluation of patient-specific desmoplastic stromal indices.
BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy is a first-line treatment for disseminated prostate cancer (PCa). However, virtually all tumors become resistant and recur as castration-resistant PCa, which has no durable cure. One major hurdle in the development of more effective therapies is the lack of preclinical models that adequately recapitulate the heterogeneity of PCa, significantly hindering the ability to accurately predict therapeutic response. OBJECTIVE: To leverage the ex vivo culture method termed patient-derived explant (PDE) to examine the impact of PCa therapeutics on a patient-by-patient basis. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Fresh PCa tissue from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy was cultured as PDEs to examine therapeutic response. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The impact of genomic and chemical perturbations in PDEs was assessed using various parameters (eg, AR levels, Ki67 staining, and desmoplastic indices). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: PDE maintained the integrity of the native tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor tissue morphology, viability, and endogenous hormone signaling. Tumor cells in this model system exhibited de novo proliferative capacity. Examination of the native TME in the PDE revealed a first-in-field insight into patient-specific desmoplastic stromal indices and predicted responsiveness to AR-directed therapeutics. CONCLUSIONS: The PDE model allows for a comprehensive evaluation of individual tumors in their native TME to ultimately develop more effective therapeutic regimens tailored to individuals. Discernment of novel stromal markers may provide a basis for applying precision medicine in treating advanced PCa, which would have a transformative effect on patient outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, an innovative model system was used to more effectively mimic human disease. The patient-derived explant (PDE) system can be used to predict therapeutic response and identify novel targets in advanced disease. Thus, the PDE will be an asset for the development of novel metrics for the implementation of precision medicine in prostate cancer.The patient-derived explant (PDE) model allows for a comprehensive evaluation of individual human tumors in their native tumor microenvironment (TME). TME analysis revealed first-in-field insight into predicted tumor responsiveness to AR-directed therapeutics through evaluation of patient-specific desmoplastic stromal indices.
Entities:
Keywords:
Androgen receptor; Ex vivo; Prostate cancer; Tumor microenvironment
Authors: D M Stroka; T Burkhardt; I Desbaillets; R H Wenger; D A Neil; C Bauer; M Gassmann; D Candinas Journal: FASEB J Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Chantal Pauli; Benjamin D Hopkins; Davide Prandi; Reid Shaw; Tarcisio Fedrizzi; Andrea Sboner; Verena Sailer; Michael Augello; Loredana Puca; Rachele Rosati; Terra J McNary; Yelena Churakova; Cynthia Cheung; Joanna Triscott; David Pisapia; Rema Rao; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Brian Robinson; Bishoy M Faltas; Brooke E Emerling; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Brady Bernard; Olivier Elemento; Himisha Beltran; Francesca Demichelis; Christopher J Kemp; Carla Grandori; Lewis C Cantley; Mark A Rubin Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Renée de Leeuw; Lisa D Berman-Booty; Matthew J Schiewer; Stephen J Ciment; Robert B Den; Adam P Dicker; William K Kelly; Edouard J Trabulsi; Costas D Lallas; Leonard G Gomella; Karen E Knudsen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C E S Comstock; M A Augello; J F Goodwin; R de Leeuw; M J Schiewer; W F Ostrander; R A Burkhart; A K McClendon; P A McCue; E J Trabulsi; C D Lallas; L G Gomella; M M Centenera; J R Brody; L M Butler; W D Tilley; K E Knudsen Journal: Oncogene Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Urszula L McClurg; Arash Nabbi; Charles Ricordel; Svitlana Korolchuk; Stuart McCracken; Rakesh Heer; Laura Wilson; Lisa M Butler; Bronwyn Kate Irving-Hooper; Rémy Pedeux; Craig N Robson; Karl T Riabowol; Olivier Binda Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Emanuela Dylgjeri; Christopher McNair; Jonathan F Goodwin; Heather K Raymon; Peter A McCue; Ayesha A Shafi; Benjamin E Leiby; Renée de Leeuw; Vishal Kothari; Jennifer J McCann; Amy C Mandigo; Saswati N Chand; Matthew J Schiewer; Lucas J Brand; Irina Vasilevskaya; Nicolas Gordon; Talya S Laufer; Leonard G Gomella; Costas D Lallas; Edouard J Trabulsi; Felix Y Feng; Ellen H Filvaroff; Kristin Hege; Dana Rathkopf; Karen E Knudsen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Asmaa El-Kenawi; William Dominguez-Viqueira; Min Liu; Shivanshu Awasthi; Julieta Abraham-Miranda; Aysenur Keske; KayLee K Steiner; Leenil Noel; Amparo N Serna; Jasreman Dhillon; Robert J Gillies; Xiaoqing Yu; John M Koomen; Kosj Yamoah; Robert A Gatenby; Brian Ruffell Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2021-07-23 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ian R Powley; Meeta Patel; Gareth Miles; Howard Pringle; Lynne Howells; Anne Thomas; Catherine Kettleborough; Justin Bryans; Tim Hammonds; Marion MacFarlane; Catrin Pritchard Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 7.640