Literature DB >> 33786487

Patient Understanding of Uterine Fibroids and the Different Surgical Approaches to Hysterectomy.

Anastasia Belilovets1, Nithya Gopal2, Erica Stockwell2,3, Jasmine Pedroso2, Joy Brotherton4,5, K Warren Volker2,3, David Howard2,3.   

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess understanding of the hysterectomy procedure and uterine fibroids among women in a general gynecology clinic. Materials and
Methods: This was an anonymous cross-sectional survey. We adapted and pilot tested a survey instrument designed to assess understanding of the hysterectomy procedure and of uterine fibroids. The final version of the survey consisted of basic demographic questions, followed by 28 knowledge questions (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). The survey was disseminated to women in the waiting room of one of our gynecology clinics. The patient population included women 18 years and older.
Results: The mean age of respondents was 33.5 years old. In total, 69.5% of the respondents had at least some college education. In the group of questions related to different types of hysterectomies, the most poorly answered question was "Which type of hysterectomy has the highest risk of damage to the bladder?" Less than 40% of the respondents were able to identify a laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy based on a written description. Of questions about uterine fibroids, the most poorly answered question was whether cancer that looks like fibroids is common, with >90% of the respondents incorrectly thinking that cancer that resembled fibroids is common. More than half of respondents did not know what a fibroid is. Conclusions: In this analysis of the understanding of the hysterectomy procedure and fibroids among an educated population, overall understanding was poor. Specific areas where knowledge was particularly poor were the different ways of doing a hysterectomy and uterine fibroids. © Anastasia Belilovets et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health literacy; hysterectomy; uterine fibroids

Year:  2020        PMID: 33786487      PMCID: PMC7784805          DOI: 10.1089/whr.2020.0040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2688-4844


  12 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial to determine whether a video presentation improves informed consent for hysterectomy.

Authors:  Alicia C Pallett; Bao T Nguyen; Natalie M Klein; Neil Phippen; Caela R Miller; Jason C Barnett
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Beri Ridgeway; Amy J Park; J Eric Jelovsek; Matthew D Barber; Tommaso Falcone; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Women's perceptions about female reproductive system: a survey from an academic obstetrics and gynecology practice.

Authors:  Oz Harmanli; Iris Ilarslan; Shamini Kirupananthan; Alexander Knee; An Harmanli
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy.

Authors:  M S Broder; D E Kanouse; B S Mittman; S J Bernstein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Patient knowledge of hysterectomy and pap screening after minimally invasive hysterectomy.

Authors:  Marlena Mattingly; Rupal Juran; Isaac Su; Jessica Ebinger; Joanne Daggy; Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-08-20

6.  Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Jennifer Tsui; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Mary Ellen Wechter; Elizabeth J Geller; Thao V Nguyen; Anthony G Visco
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Surgical management of leiomyomas for fertility or uterine preservation.

Authors:  Tommaso Falcone; William H Parker
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: application in a resident clinic population.

Authors:  S Robert Kovac; Sheela Barhan; Margit Lister; Lori Tucker; Mardi Bishop; Adrija Das
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Patient Perceptions of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gynecological Surgeries.

Authors:  Mohamad Irani; Cheruba Prabakar; Sepide Nematian; Nitasha Julka; Devika Bhatt; Pedram Bral
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.