Literature DB >> 17978124

Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.

Jennifer M Wu1, Mary Ellen Wechter, Elizabeth J Geller, Thao V Nguyen, Anthony G Visco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate hysterectomy rates by type of hysterectomy and to compare age, length of stay, and regional variation in type of hysterectomy performed for benign indications.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of national discharge data using the 2003 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. These data represent a 20% stratified sample of U.S. hospitals. Women aged 16 years or older who underwent a hysterectomy were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. We extracted data regarding age, race, diagnoses codes, length of stay, and hospital characteristics. Using 2000 National Census data and weighted data analysis for cluster sampling, we calculated hysterectomy rates.
RESULTS: In 2003, 602,457 hysterectomies were performed, for a rate of 5.38 per 1,000 women-years. Of the 538,722 hysterectomies for benign disease (rate 4.81 per 1,000 women-years), the abdominal route was the most common (66.1%), followed by vaginal (21.8%) and laparoscopic (11.8%) routes. Mean ages (+/-standard deviation) differed among hysterectomy types (abdominal 44.5+/-0.1 years, vaginal 48.2+/-0.2 years, and laparoscopic 43.6+/-0.3 years, P<.001). Mean lengths of stay (+/-standard deviation) were also different (3.0+/-0.03 days, 2.0+/-0.03 days, 1.7+/-0.03 days, respectively, P<.001). The hysterectomy rate was highest in the South (5.92 per 1,000 women-years) and lowest in the Northeast (3.33 per 1,000 women-years).
CONCLUSION: Despite a shorter length of stay, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies remain far less common than abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17978124     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  148 in total

Review 1.  The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in heavy menstrual bleeding: a benefit-risk review.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaunitz; Pirjo Inki
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Safely Increase the Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Rate: A Novel Three-Tiered Preoperative Categorization System Can Predict the Difficulty for Benign Disease.

Authors:  Esteban Andryjowicz; Teresa B Wray; V Reinaldo Ruiz; James Rudolf; Sara Noroozkhani; Sandra Crowder; Jeff M Slezak
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-07-24

3.  Short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Austin D Findley; Matthew T Siedhoff; Kumari A Hobbs; John F Steege; Erin T Carey; Christina A McCall; Anne Z Steiner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: 10 steps toward a successful procedure.

Authors:  Jon I Einarsson; Yoko Suzuki
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

Review 5.  Natural orifice hysterectomy.

Authors:  Michael D Moen; Michael B Noone; Denise M Elser
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06-11

6.  Robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women.

Authors:  Sonia A Rebeles; Howard G Muntz; Carrie Wieneke-Broghammer; Emily S Vason; Kathryn F McGonigle
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-08-26

7.  Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and staging for the treatment of endometrial cancer: a comparison with conventional laparoscopy and abdominal approaches.

Authors:  Ricardo Estape; Nicholas Lambrou; Eric Estape; Oscar Vega; Trisha Ojea
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-06-25

8.  Does size matter? The effect of uterine weight on robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Mona E Orady; A Karim Nawfal; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-05-13

9.  Contemporary Geographic Variation and Sociodemographic Correlates of Hysterectomy Rates Among Reproductive-Age Women.

Authors:  Danielle R Gartner; Kemi M Doll; Robert A Hummer; Whitney R Robinson
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  A prospective study of weight gain after premenopausal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Patricia G Moorman; Joellen M Schildkraut; Edwin S Iversen; Evan R Myers; Margaret Gradison; Nicolette Warren-White; Frances Wang
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.