Literature DB >> 33786484

Cold Compress for Intrauterine Device Insertional Pain: A Randomized Control Trial.

Jordan Hylton1, Sarah Milton1, Adam P Sima2, Nicole W Karjane1.   

Abstract

Background: Pain with intrauterine device (IUD) insertion is identified as a barrier to uptake of this highly effective long-acting reversible contraceptive. Several studies have assessed the efficacy of interventions to alleviate patient discomfort associated with IUD insertion, but no interventions have been clearly shown to improve procedural pain. The aim of this study was to determine whether use of a cold compress on the abdomen during IUD insertion reduces pain. Materials and
Methods: This was a prospective randomized control trial of women presenting to Virginia Commonwealth University for insertion of IUD from September 2016 to October 2017. A power analysis determined that 69 subjects were needed in each arm to detect a 30% reduction in pain with a power of 80%, significance value of p < 0.05. One hundred forty-two participants were consented for the study, 69 were randomized to the control group, which received the usual management, and 73 were randomized to the study group, which received a cold compress to the abdomen before the procedure. In addition to data on the difference from pre- to postprocedure pain scales, we collected information regarding inserting provider type, gravidity/parity, body mass index, demographic information (age, race, insurance type, and level of education), history of IUD placement or cervical procedure, history of chronic pain, and the use of regular pain medications (defined as more than once per week). Statistical analysis was accomplished using t-test and chi square tests.
Results: There was no difference in pre and postinsertional pain in those who received a cold compress versus the control during insertion of an IUD (3.4 vs. 3.5). The insertional pain was rated at 4.3 and 4.6 for patients who received the cold compress and the control group, respectively (p = 0.805).
Conclusion: Although a cold compress is a simple, inexpensive, and safe method of pain control, this study shows no reduction in insertional pain for IUD placement. © Jordan Hylton et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contraception; insertional pain; intrauterine device

Year:  2020        PMID: 33786484      PMCID: PMC7784818          DOI: 10.1089/whr.2020.0056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2688-4844


  14 in total

1.  Pain control for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized trial of 1% lidocaine paracervical block.

Authors:  Sheila K Mody; Jessica Kiley; Alfred Rademaker; Lori Gawron; Catherine Stika; Cassing Hammond
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  Cochrane systematic reviews of IUD trials: lessons learned.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Carol Manion; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Pain relief with naproxen following insertion of an intrauterine device.

Authors:  S E Massey; J C Varady; M R Henzl
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Practice Bulletin No. 186 Summary: Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Effects of prophylactic misoprostol administration prior to intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Alison B Edelman; Elizabeth Schaefer; Amanda Olson; Laura Van Houten; Paula Bednarek; Catherine Leclair; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Pain reduction during and after insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  N D Goldstuck
Journal:  Adv Contracept       Date:  1987-03

7.  Anticipated pain as a predictor of discomfort with intrauterine device placement.

Authors:  Blair Dina; Leah J Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Reducing Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Adolescents and Young Women.

Authors:  Aletha Y Akers; Caren Steinway; Sarita Sonalkar; Lisa K Perriera; Courtney Schreiber; Jennifer Harding; J Felipe Garcia-Espana
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Strategies to Mitigate Anxiety and Pain in Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Laura Nguyen; Larkin Lamarche; Robin Lennox; Amanda Ramdyal; Tejal Patel; Morgan Black; Dee Mangin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2019-12-25

10.  The role of cold compression dressings in the postoperative treatment of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A S Levy; E Marmar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.