Literature DB >> 28885425

Reducing Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Adolescents and Young Women.

Aletha Y Akers1, Caren Steinway, Sarita Sonalkar, Lisa K Perriera, Courtney Schreiber, Jennifer Harding, J Felipe Garcia-Espana.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of a 1% lidocaine paracervical nerve block on pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion compared with a sham block in adolescents and young women.
METHODS: We conducted a multisite, single-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial in adolescents and young women having a 13.5-mg levonorgestrel IUD inserted. Enrollment occurred at three family planning clinics in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Eligible adolescents and young women were aged 14-22 years, nulliparous, not currently or recently pregnant, and English-speaking. Participants were randomized using computer-generated allocation in block sizes of four to receive a 10-mL 1% lidocaine paracervical block or a sham block (1 cm depression of the vaginal epithelium at paracervical block sites with a wooden cotton-tipped applicator). Only patients were blinded. The primary outcome was pain after IUD insertion measured with a 100-mm visual analog scale. Using a two-sided t test and assuming a 20-mm difference in visual analog scale scores, a SD of 28 mm, an α of 0.05, and 90% power, a sample of 43 participants per group was estimated.
RESULTS: Between March 2015 and July 2016, 95 participants enrolled (47 lidocaine block group; 48 sham block group). All were included in the analysis. Forty-four percent were white, 36% black, 65% privately insured, and 79% previously used contraception. The median visual analog scale score after IUD insertion was 30.0 (95% CI 20.0-58.0) in the lidocaine block group and 71.5 (95% CI 66.0-82.0) in the sham block (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: A 10-mL 1% lidocaine paracervical nerve block reduces pain during IUD insertion in adolescents and young women compared with a sham block with pressure on the vaginal epithelium. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02352714.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28885425     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

1.  In Reply.

Authors:  Sheila K Mody; Lynn L Ngo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Anticipated Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion.

Authors:  Tegan A Hunter; Sarita Sonalkar; Courtney A Schreiber; Lisa K Perriera; Mary D Sammel; Aletha Y Akers
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.814

3.  Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sheila K Mody; John Paul Farala; Berenice Jimenez; Moena Nishikawa; Lynn L Ngo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Intrauterine Device Insertion Procedure Duration in Adolescent and Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Katherine L O'Flynn O'Brien; Aletha Y Akers; Lisa K Perriera; Courtney A Schreiber; J Felipe Garcia-Espana; Sarita Sonalkar
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 1.814

5.  Satisfaction With the Intrauterine Device Insertion Procedure Among Adolescent and Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Aletha Y Akers; Jennifer Harding; Lisa K Perriera; Courtney Schreiber; J Felipe Garcia-Espana; Sarita Sonalkar
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review.

Authors:  Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Jeffrey T Jensen; Ilza Monteiro; Tina Peers; Maria Rodriguez; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Luis Bahamondes
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Cold Compress for Intrauterine Device Insertional Pain: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Jordan Hylton; Sarah Milton; Adam P Sima; Nicole W Karjane
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-08-04

8.  Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elaine Cristina Fontes de Oliveira; Thaís Baêta; Ana Paula Caldeira Brant; Agnaldo Silva-Filho; Ana Luiza Lunardi Rocha
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Uterine and Tubal Lavage for Earlier Cancer Detection Using an Innovative Catheter: A Feasibility and Safety Study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Maritschnegg; Florian Heitz; Nina Pecha; Jirí Bouda; Fabian Trillsch; Christoph Grimm; Adriaan Vanderstichele; Christiane Agreiter; Philipp Harter; Eva Obermayr; Ignace Vergote; Robert Zeillinger; Paul Speiser
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.437

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.