Literature DB >> 22770792

Pain control for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized trial of 1% lidocaine paracervical block.

Sheila K Mody1, Jessica Kiley, Alfred Rademaker, Lori Gawron, Catherine Stika, Cassing Hammond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to investigate the effects of a 1% lidocaine paracervical block on perceived patient pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. STUDY
DESIGN: We randomized 50 women undergoing IUD insertion to receive either a 10-mL 1% lidocaine paracervical block or no local anesthetic before IUD insertion. Women marked their pain on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst pain possible) at various points of the procedure (speculum insertion, tenaculum placement, paracervical block administration, IUD insertion and 5 min postprocedure).
RESULTS: Twenty-six women received the paracervical block before IUD insertion, and 24 received no local anesthesia. Groups were similar in age, parity, ethnicity, education and complications. Women who received the paracervical block reported a median VAS score of 24.0 mm with IUD insertion, and women who did not receive local anesthetic reported a median VAS score of 62.0 mm with IUD insertion; p=.09.
CONCLUSION: Compared with no anesthetic, a 1% lidocaine paracervical block did not result in a statistically significant decrease in perceived pain with IUD insertion.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22770792     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  9 in total

1.  Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sheila K Mody; John Paul Farala; Berenice Jimenez; Moena Nishikawa; Lynn L Ngo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Paracervical Block for Laminaria Insertion Before Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Reni Soon; Mary Tschann; Jennifer Salcedo; Katelyn Stevens; Hyeong Jun Ahn; Bliss Kaneshiro
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Intrauterine Device Insertion Procedure Duration in Adolescent and Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Katherine L O'Flynn O'Brien; Aletha Y Akers; Lisa K Perriera; Courtney A Schreiber; J Felipe Garcia-Espana; Sarita Sonalkar
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 1.814

4.  Ketorolac for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lynn L Ngo; Kristy K Ward; Sheila K Mody
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Intrauterine lidocaine and naproxen for analgesia during intrauterine device insertion: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shana M Miles; Katerina Shvartsman; Susan Dunlow
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2019-09-10

6.  Cold Compress for Intrauterine Device Insertional Pain: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Jordan Hylton; Sarah Milton; Adam P Sima; Nicole W Karjane
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-08-04

Review 7.  Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives.

Authors:  K Gemzell-Danielsson; D Mansour; C Fiala; A M Kaunitz; L Bahamondes
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 8.  Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Alissa Bernholc; Yanwu Zeng; Rebecca H Allen; Deborah Bartz; Paul A O'Brien; David Hubacher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-29

9.  A comparison of the expected and actual pain experienced by women during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  Nataliya Brima; Hannat Akintomide; Vivian Iguyovwe; Susan Mann
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2015-02-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.