| Literature DB >> 33785872 |
Devender Arora1, Krishnamoorthy Srikanth1,2, Jongin Lee3, Daehwan Lee3, Nayoung Park3, Suyeon Wy3, Hyeonji Kim3, Jong-Eun Park1, Han-Ha Chai1, Dajeong Lim1, In-Cheol Cho4, Jaebum Kim5, Woncheoul Park6.
Abstract
Pig as a food source serves daily dietary demand to a wide population around the world. Preference of meat depends on various factors with muscle play the central role. In this regards, selective breeding abled us to develop "Nanchukmacdon" a pig breeds with an enhanced variety of meat and high fertility rate. To identify genomic regions under selection we performed whole-genome resequencing, transcriptome, and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing from Nanchukmacdon muscles samples and used published data for three other breeds such as Landrace, Duroc, Jeju native pig and analyzed the functional characterization of candidate genes. In this study, we present a comprehensive approach to identify candidate genes by using multi-omics approaches. We performed two different methods XP-EHH, XP-CLR to identify traces of artificial selection for traits of economic importance. Moreover, RNAseq analysis was done to identify differentially expressed genes in the crossed breed population. Several genes (UGT8, ZGRF1, NDUFA10, EBF3, ELN, UBE2L6, NCALD, MELK, SERP2, GDPD5, and FHL2) were identified as selective sweep and differentially expressed in muscles related pathways. Furthermore, nucleotide diversity analysis revealed low genetic diversity in Nanchukmacdon for identified genes in comparison to related breeds and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data shows the critical role of DNA methylation pattern in identified genes that leads to enhanced variety of meat. This work demonstrates a way to identify the molecular signature and lays a foundation for future genomic enabled pig breeding.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33785872 PMCID: PMC8009959 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86683-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Population structure analyses for all pig individuals. (a) First and second principal components from a principal component analysis of all populations WGS data. (b) PCA for muscles RNA-seq data distinct the population group. (c) Rooted and un-rooted tree representation of related closeness amongst different pig breed. (d) Heat-map visualization of common DEGs: column represent DEGs from muscle and row represent assemble method from 20 pig samples. (e) Population structure plots for all pig populations at K = 4.
Figure 2Result of RNAseq analysis of Nanchukmacdon with Duroc, Jeju native pig and Landrace. (a) Commonly identified differentially expressed genes. (b) Volcano-Plot for distribution of adjusted p-value with log2foldchange for DEGs analysis in muscles against Duroc, Black pig and landrace with Nanchukmacdon respectively and (c) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis after functional annotation with p < 0.01. Enriched pathway in Nanchukmacdon from the different breed was performed by dot-plot analysis.
Figure 3(a) Candidate selective sweep analysis for NC. A window size of 10k with the binning size of 10 was chosen and top 1% XP-CLR scores were extracted and a cutoff of -2 with significant p-value ≤ 0.05 were selected for XP-EHH scores. Commonly identified genes were subsequently mapped with differentially expressed genes. Positively expressed DEGs were indicated in red color. Nuclear diversity plot for the identified candidate genes (b) represent the nuclear diversity at each point of location and their respective haplotype distribution with genomic position biallelic alleles are shown in sky-blue (homozygous variant) and blue (Heterozygous variant).
Figure 4Related protein association and validation was performed. (a) All the identified genes were visualized using string database. (b) RT-PCR result for randomly selected genes showing high correlation and significant p-value or r = 0.931 and p-value = 0.00232. (c,d) Methylation pattern where a relative degree of gene stabilization can be seen and (d) sharply decreasing at TSS region of CpG island and stabilizing afterwards.
Commonly identified selective signature genes with top 1% of XP-CLR and -2 cutoff for XP-EHH score with log2fold change of < − 1 and FDR of 0.05 against JNP, Duroc and Landrace.
| Compare | Chr | Gene symbol | ENS_ID | XP-CLR | XP-EHH | log2FC | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanchukmacdon vs. Jeju Native Pig | 1 | MELK | ENSSSCG00000005344 | 50.31517901 | − 2.312935631 | − 2.18 | 0.000124034 |
| 11 | SERP2 | ENSSSCG00000040405 | 67.168271 | − 2.485311147 | − 2.15 | 0.008392278 | |
| 9 | GDPD5 | ENSSSCG00000014853 | 163.2458645 | − 2.364323658 | − 1.63 | 0.00000212 | |
| 3 | FHL2 | ENSSSCG00000008147 | 78.45288699 | − 2.696124665 | − 1 | 0.000516892 | |
| Nanchukmacdon vs. Duroc | 8 | UGT8 | ENSSSCG00000031904 | 44.70694034 | − 2.024535069 | − 3.64 | 0.003195103 |
| 8 | ZGRF1 | ENSSSCG00000009120 | 56.23853217 | − 2.164609468 | − 1.52 | 0.003773682 | |
| 15 | NDUFA10 | ENSSSCG00000016349 | 55.03739176 | − 2.714584707 | − 1.24 | 0.00000000000000181 | |
| 14 | EBF3 | ENSSSCG00000010757 | 86.87865636 | − 2.505302829 | − 1.09 | 0.0000000000063 | |
| Nanchukmacdon vs. Landrace | 8 | UGT8 | ENSSSCG00000031904 | 57.77182778 | − 2.738613817 | − 2.34 | 0.000178915 |
| 3 | ELN | ENSSSCG00000025858 | 85.97446047 | − 2.080438144 | − 1.94 | 0.0000000000000772 | |
| 4 | NCALD | ENSSSCG00000006059 | 58.25052636 | − 2.861748569 | − 1.05 | 0.0000000314 | |
| 2 | UBE2L6 | ENSSSCG00000023379 | 80.85200729 | − 2.939038774 | − 1.14 | 0.000000515 |
Figure 5Overview of the pipeline followed to identify selective sweep genes.