| Literature DB >> 27890017 |
Robert VanBuren1,2, Ching Man Wai1,2, Jisen Zhang1, Jennifer Han2, Jie Arro2, Zhicong Lin1, Zhenyang Liao1, Qingyi Yu3, Ming-Li Wang4, Francis Zee5, Richard C Moore6, Deborah Charlesworth7, Ray Ming8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The papaya Y-linked region showed clear population structure, resulting in the detection of the ancestral male population that domesticated hermaphrodite papayas were selected from. The same populations were used to study nucleotide diversity and population structure in the X-linked region.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27890017 PMCID: PMC5125041 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-1095-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol ISSN: 1474-7596 Impact factor: 13.583
Summary statistics for population genetics tests in papaya
| Chromosomal region |
| π | Tajima’s D | Δπ | Fst |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autosome | 0.0018 | 0.0017 | |||
| PAR | 0.002 | 0.002 | |||
| X-linked X | 0.00017 | 0.00038 | |||
| X wild | −0.12 | −0.76 | |||
| X cultivated | 1.02 | −0.63 | |||
| X-linked wild versus X cultivated | 0.05 | ||||
| PAR wild versus PAR cultivated | 0.11 |
Summary of statistical comparisons between regions in papaya
| Comparison |
|
|---|---|
| X-linked πsyn versus autosomal πsyn × πsyn versus autosome πsyn | 1 × 10−5 |
| X-linked π versus autosomal π × π versus autosome π | 2.4 × 10−6 |
| X-linked π versus PAR π × π versus PAR π | 4.3 × 10−6 |
| PAR π versus autosomal π × PAR π versus autosome π | 0.14 |
| D Xwild versus D Xcultivated | 1.5 × 10−4 |
| Δπ Xwild versus Δπ Xcultivated | 1.5 × 10−3 |
*Based on Wilcoxon sign-rank tests, to take account of the different sample sizes being compared
Fig. 1Reduced nucleotide diversity in the X region of papaya. Nucleotide diversity (π) is plotted along chromosome 1 in sliding windows of 100 kb with step size of 25 kb. Nucleotide diversity in gynodioecious papaya from domesticated samples (including X-linked regions of both hermaphrodites and females) is plotted in red and for wild dioecious populations (including males and females) in blue
Fig. 2Reduced X-linked region nucleotide diversity compared to that of homologous Y-linked genes. The percentage differences in synonymous site nucleotide diversity between X and Y gene copies, relative to the diversity estimates for the Y-linked copies, are plotted for each gene with non-zero diversity in the Y-linked copy in the old stratum (Region 1), young stratum (Region 2) and the Collinear region. The names of the genes are shown on the x-axes of the plots. Four genes with one or more variants in the X-linked copy but none in the Y-linked copy were excluded from the figure, one in region 2 and three in the collinear region; the diversity among the X-linked copies of all these genes was very low (the highest value was 5 × 10−4 for one of the collinear region genes, about 100 times less than the average for alleles inferred to be associated with the corresponding Y-linked region)
Fig. 3Tajima’s D across the X region and PAR of papaya. Tajima’s D values are plotted in sliding windows of 100 kb with step size of 25 kb. Red shows values in gynodioecious papaya and blue those for dioecious natural populations
Fig. 4Contrasting population structure of the X region and the PAR. Gynodioecious papaya (hermaphrodites) are shown in blue and males from dioecious natural populations in red. We used 13,259 X-specific and 217,446 PAR SNPs/indels for all analyses. a Maximum likelihood phylogeny based on X-specific polymorphisms constructed in SNPhylo. b principal component analysis (PCA) based on all PAR SNPs/indels. The two distinct clusters separating male and hermaphrodite autosomes are circled in grey. c PCA based on all X-specific SNPs/indels. The single cluster containing both males and hermaphrodite Xs is circled and the outliers Cp11 and Cp44 are labeled. d Population structure analysis of PAR using STRUCTURE. Each accession is represented by a vertical bar and the length of each colored segment represents the contribution of each subgroup. e Population structure analysis of the X-linked region showing that STRUCTURE assigns the sequences from the dioecious and gynodioecious samples to a single population
Fig. 5Genetic distance (F ) between the dioecious and gynodioecious papaya samples using the PAR and fully X-linked regions. a Mean F values between gynodioecious and dioecious papaya strains, plotted in sliding windows of 100 kb with step size of 25 kb. b Mean F values for the X-specific region. The two inversion regions correspond to the two evolutionary strata (see text)