| Literature DB >> 30699111 |
Oswald Matika1, Diego Robledo1, Ricardo Pong-Wong1, Stephen C Bishop1, Valentina Riggio1, Heather Finlayson1, Natalie R Lowe1, Annabelle E Hoste2, Grant A Walling2, Jorge Del-Pozo1, Alan L Archibald1, John A Woolliams1, Ross D Houston1.
Abstract
Balancing selection provides a plausible explanation for the maintenance of deleterious alleles at moderate frequency in livestock, including lethal recessives exhibiting heterozygous advantage in carriers. In the current study, a leg weakness syndrome causing mortality of piglets in a commercial line showed monogenic recessive inheritance, and a region on chromosome 15 associated with the syndrome was identified by homozygosity mapping. Whole genome resequencing of cases and controls identified a mutation causing a premature stop codon within exon 3 of the porcine Myostatin (MSTN) gene, similar to those causing a double-muscling phenotype observed in several mammalian species. The MSTN mutation was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the population at birth, but significantly distorted amongst animals still in the herd at 110 kg, due to an absence of homozygous mutant genotypes. In heterozygous form, the MSTN mutation was associated with a major increase in muscle depth and decrease in fat depth, suggesting that the deleterious allele was maintained at moderate frequency due to heterozygous advantage (allele frequency, q = 0.22). Knockout of the porcine MSTN by gene editing has previously been linked to problems of low piglet survival and lameness. This MSTN mutation is an example of putative balancing selection in livestock, providing a plausible explanation for the lack of disrupting MSTN mutations in pigs despite many generations of selection for lean growth.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30699111 PMCID: PMC6370237 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007759
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Genet ISSN: 1553-7390 Impact factor: 5.917
Number of animals in pedigree and records used for variance components analyses.
| Description | Data |
|---|---|
| Number of records | 19,006 |
| Number of pedigree records | 27,501 |
| Number of generations | 9 |
| Number of litter | 1,903 |
| Number of Sires | 346 |
| Number of Sires of Sire | 175 |
| Number of Dams of Sire | 239 |
| Number of Dams | 1,929 |
| Number of Sires of Dam | 240 |
| Number of Dams of Dam | 882 |
| Leg weakness prevalence % | 6.3 |
Genetic parameter estimates and standard errors (in parentheses) for the trait of leg weakness on the liability scale using the logit transformation showing the outcomes of fitting sire or dam models with or without maternal environment (σ2w).
All models have litter variance (σ2v) fitted.
| Model | Sire | Sire and Dam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| σ2w >0 | σ2w >0 | σ2w = 0 | |
| σ2s | 1.069 (0.283) | 1.100 (0.290) | 1.087 (0.286) |
| σ2d | 0.664 (0.231) | 1.110 (0.186) | |
| σ2v | 0.681 (0.123) | 0.681 (0.123) | 0.769 (0.123) |
| σ2w | 0.999 (0.148) | 0.437 (0.203) | |
| σ2p | 6.049 (0.307) | 6.182 (0.322) | 6.267 (0.325) |
| h2u | 0.71 (0.16) | 0.57 (0.10) | 0.70 (0.08) |
| σ2v/σ2p | 0.11 (0.02) | 0.11 (0.02) | 0.12 (0.02) |
| σ2w/σ2p | 0.17 (0.2) | 0.07 (0.03) | |
¥ - σ2s, σ2d, σ2v and σ2w are variances due to the sire and dam genetic effects, litter and maternal environment effects. σ2p is phenotypic variance. h2u is estimated heritability on observed scale, and σ2v/σ2p and σ2w/σ2p are the proportion of phenotypic variance explained by the litter and maternal environment effects respectively
Fig 1A: Homozygosity mapping of the leg weakness syndrome assuming a single underlying recessive mutation on Chromosome 15 (SSC15). Vertical blocks in red and yellow represent homozygous genotypes, and blue the heterozygote genotype. The ten cases (above) and ten controls (below) are shown (one per line). A summary of homozygosity mapping is provided cases vs control at the bottom of Fig 1A in which if all the animals within a group (i.e. case or control) are homozygous for the same allele, then the relevant colour (red or yellow) is shown and if any animal within a group (i.e. case or control) is heterozygous then the SNP is coloured blue B: This is an extract from Fig 1A, showing the longest shared haplotype segment (55 SNPs) in the cases on SSC15 ranging from ALGA0110636 (rs81338938) to H3GA0044732 (rs80936849) and corresponds to position 86,745,668–95,062,143 in the new pig reference genome assembly Sscrofa11.1 GCA_000003025.6). The first ten lines are the cases; the second ten lines are the controls with genotypes shown only for the region of homozygosity shared across the controls. Genotypes shown for controls are shown only if they are different to cases (blank genotype in controls within the targeted segment means that they share the same genotype as cases). Finally, the bottom two lines are summary lines shown on the same basis as the summary lines in Fig 1A.
Fig 2A: Position of the premature stop causing mutation within the porcine myostatin locus; B: Conservation of the amino acid sequence surrounding the mutation, with the consequences of the premature stop mutation highlighted in red.
Estimates and statistical significance of the effect of the MSTN c.820G>T locus on the growth and carcass traits of pigs obtained from a commercial performance test.
Estimates are shown in absolute units and standardised by phenotypic standard deviations (σ). Standard errors are in parentheses. The traits are categorised into: live weights and live weight gain; muscle and fat depths measured by ultrasound at the end of the test either conditional on age or on live weight; and periods to achieve growth targets.
| Trait | TG-GG | Wald | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG | GG | TG-GG | test | |||
| At start (kg) | 36.83 (0.84) | 38.18 (0.85) | -1.36 (0.44) | 3.81 (0.18) | -0.36 | P<0.01 |
| At end (kg) | 84.89 (1.59) | 87.13 (1.64) | -2.24 (0.94) | 7.96 (0.33) | -0.28 | P<0.05 |
| Daily gain (kg/d) | 1.02 (0.02) | 1.03 (0.02) | -0.01 (0.01) | 0.11 (0.01) | -0.09 | NS |
| 8.42 (0.62) | 10.19 (0.62) | 2.72 (0.13) | -0.65 | P<0.001 | ||
| 53.21 (1.11) | 48.38 (1.10) | 4.83 (0.68) | 5.95 (0.25) | 0.81 | P<0.001 | |
| Fat depth (mm) | 9.25 (0.57) | 10.74 (0.56) | -1.49 (0.28) | 2.49 (0.12) | -0.60 | P<0.001 |
| Muscle depth (mm) | 54.89 (1.05) | 49.49 (1.02) | 5.40 (0.63) | 5.54 (0.24) | 0.97 | P<0.001 |
| To 40kg (d) | 91.66 (2.12) | 88.62 (2.11) | 3.04 (1.01) | 9.01 (0.45) | 0.36 | P<0.01 |
| From 40 to 100kg (d) | 66.33 (1.67) | 66.62 (1.67) | -0.29 (1.81) | 6.75 (0.36) | -0.04 | NS |
¥ The most salient results presented in the manuscript