Literature DB >> 33776935

Motivational Interviewing and Glycemic Control in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Anna-Kaisa Tuomaala1, Matti Hero1, Martti T Tuomisto2, Maria Lähteenmäki2, Päivi J Miettinen1, Tiina Laine1, Karoliina Wehkalampi1, Sanne Kiiveri1, Pekka Ahonen1, Marja Ojaniemi3, Kari Kaunisto3, Päivi Tossavainen3, Risto Lapatto1, Taisto Sarkola1,4, Mari-Anne Pulkkinen1.   

Abstract

A multicenter randomized controlled pilot trial investigated whether motivational interviewing (MI) by diabetes physicians improves glycemic control and variability in the context of follow-up for adolescent patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. Patients (n = 47) aged 12 to 15.9 years who showed poor glycemic control (HbA1c >75 mmol/mol/9.0%) were randomized to standard education (SE) only or MI+SE, with study physicians randomized to employ MI+SE (N = 24 patients) or SE only (N = 23). For one year of follow-up, the main outcome measurements were obtained at three-month visits (HbA1c) or six-monthly: time in range (TIR) and glycemic variability (CV). Mean adjusted 12-month change in HbA1c was similar between the MI+SE and SE-only group (-3.6 vs. -1.0 mmol/mol), and no inter-group differences were visible in the mean adjusted 12-month change in TIR (-0.8 vs. 2.6%; P = 0.53) or CV (-0.5 vs. -6.2; P = 0.26). However, the order of entering the study correlated significantly with the 12-month change in HbA1c in the MI+SE group (r = -0.5; P = 0.006) and not in the SE-only group (r = 0.2; P = 0.4). No link was evident between MI and changes in quality of life. The authors conclude that MI's short-term use by diabetes physicians managing adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes was not superior to SE alone; however, improved skills in applying the MI method at the outpatient clinic may produce greater benefits in glycemic control.
Copyright © 2021 Tuomaala, Hero, Tuomisto, Lähteenmäki, Miettinen, Laine, Wehkalampi, Kiiveri, Ahonen, Ojaniemi, Kaunisto, Tossavainen, Lapatto, Sarkola and Pulkkinen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HbA1c; adolescent; diabetes; glycemic control; motivational interviewing (MI)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33776935      PMCID: PMC7994365          DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.639507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)        ISSN: 1664-2392            Impact factor:   5.555


  29 in total

1.  A pilot study of motivational interviewing in adolescents with diabetes.

Authors:  S Channon; V J Smith; J W Gregory
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Exploring the role of motivational interviewing in adolescent patient-provider communication about type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Laura J Caccavale; Rosalie Corona; Jessica G LaRose; Suzanne E Mazzeo; Alexandra R Sova; Melanie K Bean
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.866

3.  Approved IFCC reference method for the measurement of HbA1c in human blood.

Authors:  Jan-Olof Jeppsson; Uwe Kobold; John Barr; Andreas Finke; Wieland Hoelzel; Tadao Hoshino; Kor Miedema; Andrea Mosca; Pierluigi Mauri; Rita Paroni; Linda Thienpont; Masao Umemoto; Cas Weykamp
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Beneficial effects of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence: outcomes after the conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT).

Authors:  N H White; P A Cleary; W Dahms; D Goldstein; J Malone; W V Tamborlane
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Effect of A1C and Glucose on Postoperative Mortality in Noncardiac and Cardiac Surgeries.

Authors:  Willem van den Boom; Rebecca A Schroeder; Michael W Manning; Tracy L Setji; Gic-Owens Fiestan; David B Dunson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 6.  Motivational interventions in the management of HbA1c levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Allan Jones; Beryl Primrose Gladstone; Marlene Lübeck; Nanna Lindekilde; Dominic Upton; Werner Vach
Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 2.459

7.  Validation of Time in Range as an Outcome Measure for Diabetes Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Tonya D Riddlesworth; Craig Kollman; Zhaomian Li; Adam S Brown; Kelly L Close
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  A randomized controlled trial comparing motivational interviewing in education to structured diabetes education in teens with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Wang; Sunita M Stewart; Marsha Mackenzie; Paul A Nakonezny; Deidre Edwards; Perrin C White
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 17.152

9.  General quality of life in youth with type 1 diabetes: relationship to patient management and diabetes-specific family conflict.

Authors:  Lori M B Laffel; Alexa Connell; Laura Vangsness; Ann Goebel-Fabbri; Abigail Mansfield; Barbara J Anderson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range.

Authors:  Tadej Battelino; Thomas Danne; Richard M Bergenstal; Stephanie A Amiel; Roy Beck; Torben Biester; Emanuele Bosi; Bruce A Buckingham; William T Cefalu; Kelly L Close; Claudio Cobelli; Eyal Dassau; J Hans DeVries; Kim C Donaghue; Klemen Dovc; Francis J Doyle; Satish Garg; George Grunberger; Simon Heller; Lutz Heinemann; Irl B Hirsch; Roman Hovorka; Weiping Jia; Olga Kordonouri; Boris Kovatchev; Aaron Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Brian Levine; Alexander Mayorov; Chantal Mathieu; Helen R Murphy; Revital Nimri; Kirsten Nørgaard; Christopher G Parkin; Eric Renard; David Rodbard; Banshi Saboo; Desmond Schatz; Keaton Stoner; Tatsuiko Urakami; Stuart A Weinzimer; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.