Literature DB >> 30352896

Validation of Time in Range as an Outcome Measure for Diabetes Clinical Trials.

Roy W Beck1, Richard M Bergenstal2, Tonya D Riddlesworth3, Craig Kollman3, Zhaomian Li3, Adam S Brown4, Kelly L Close5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the association of time in range (TIR) of 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10 mmol/L) with the development or progression of retinopathy and development of microalbuminuria using the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) data set in order to validate the use of TIR as an outcome measure for clinical trials. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In the DCCT, blood glucose concentrations were measured at a central laboratory from seven fingerstick samples (seven-point testing: pre- and 90-min postmeals and at bedtime) collected during 1 day every 3 months. Retinopathy progression was assessed every 6 months and urinary microalbuminuria development every 12 months. Proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of TIR and other glycemic metrics, computed from the seven-point fingerstick data, with the rate of development of microvascular complications.
RESULTS: Mean TIR of seven-point profiles for the 1,440 participants was 41 ± 16%. The hazard rate of development of retinopathy progression was increased by 64% (95% CI 51-78), and development of the microalbuminuria outcome was increased by 40% (95% CI 25-56), for each 10 percentage points lower TIR (P < 0.001 for each). Results were similar for mean glucose and hyperglycemia metrics.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, a compelling case can be made that TIR is strongly associated with the risk of microvascular complications and should be an acceptable end point for clinical trials. Although hemoglobin A1c remains a valuable outcome metric in clinical trials, TIR and other glycemic metrics-especially when measured with continuous glucose monitoring-add value as outcome measures in many studies.
© 2018 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30352896      PMCID: PMC6905478          DOI: 10.2337/dc18-1444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  25 in total

1.  Role of Glycated Proteins in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes: Research Gaps and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kerry J Welsh; M Sue Kirkman; David B Sacks
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Glucose Concentrations of Less Than 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) Should Be Reported in Clinical Trials: A Joint Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  The relation of glycaemia to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the Diabetic Control and Complications Trial.

Authors:  F J Service; P C O'Brien
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Metrics for glycaemic control - from HbA1c to continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). Design and methodologic considerations for the feasibility phase. The DCCT Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  Unexplained variability of glycated haemoglobin in non-diabetic subjects not related to glycaemia.

Authors:  J S Yudkin; R D Forrest; C A Jackson; A J Ryle; S Davie; B J Gould
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Diurnal Differences in Risk of Cardiac Arrhythmias During Spontaneous Hypoglycemia in Young People With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Peter Novodvorsky; Alan Bernjak; Elaine Chow; Ahmed Iqbal; Lianne Sellors; Scott Williams; Robert A Fawdry; Bhavin Parekh; Richard M Jacques; Jefferson L B Marques; Paul J Sheridan; Simon R Heller
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Relationship of glycated albumin to blood glucose and HbA1c values and to retinopathy, nephropathy, and cardiovascular outcomes in the DCCT/EDIC study.

Authors:  David M Nathan; Paula McGee; Michael W Steffes; John M Lachin
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Association of Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes With Progression of Microvascular Outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.

Authors:  John M Lachin; Ionut Bebu; Richard M Bergenstal; Rodica Pop-Busui; F John Service; Bernard Zinman; David M Nathan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  142 in total

1.  Evaluating Glucose Control With a Novel Composite Continuous Glucose Monitoring Index.

Authors:  Lalantha Leelarathna; Hood Thabit; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Lia Bally; Julia K Mader; Thomas R Pieber; Carsten Benesch; Sabine Arnolds; Terri Johnson; Lutz Heinemann; Norbert Hermanns; Mark L Evans; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-31

2.  Differences for Percentage Times in Glycemic Range Between Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Capillary Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Analysis of the REPLACE-BG Dataset.

Authors:  Parizad Avari; Chukwuma Uduku; Daniel George; Pau Herrero; Monika Reddy; Nick Oliver
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  The Association of Biochemical Hypoglycemia with the Subsequent Risk of a Severe Hypoglycemic Event: Analysis of the DCCT Data Set.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Tonya D Riddlesworth; Craig Kollman
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 4.  Positioning time in range in diabetes management.

Authors:  Andrew Advani
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Sleep coach intervention for teens with type 1 diabetes: Randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Sarah S Jaser; Emily R Hamburger; Erin M Bergner; Rodayne Williams; James C Slaughter; Jill H Simmons; Beth A Malow
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.866

6.  Identification of clinically relevant dysglycemia phenotypes based on continuous glucose monitoring data from youth with type 1 diabetes and elevated hemoglobin A1c.

Authors:  Anna R Kahkoska; Linda A Adair; Allison E Aiello; Kyle S Burger; John B Buse; Jamie Crandell; David M Maahs; Crystal T Nguyen; Michael R Kosorok; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.866

Review 7.  Optimizing Diabetes Care With the Standardized Continuous Glucose Monitoring Report.

Authors:  Ji H Cj Chun; Megan S O'Neill
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-04

8.  Estimation of Hemoglobin A1c from Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: Is Time In Range All We Need?

Authors:  Chiara Fabris; Lutz Heinemann; Roy Beck; Claudio Cobelli; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  The Relationships Between Time in Range, Hyperglycemia Metrics, and HbA1c.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Peiyao Cheng; Craig Kollman; Anders L Carlson; Mary L Johnson; David Rodbard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-13

10.  The Changing Landscape of Glycemic Targets: Focus on Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Pamela R Kushner; Davida F Kruger
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.