Nancy Lee1, Heiko Schoder2, Brad Beattie3, Ryan Lanning4, Nadeem Riaz4, Sean McBride4, Nora Katabi5, Duan Li6, Brett Yarusi4, Susie Chan4, Lindsey Mitrani4, Zhigang Zhang7, David G Pfister8, Eric Sherman8, Shrujal Baxi8, Jay Boyle9, Luc G T Morris9, Ian Ganly9, Richard Wong9, John Humm3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: leen2@mskcc.org. 2. Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 5. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 6. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 7. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 8. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 9. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report a small substudy of an ongoing large, multi-arm study using functional imaging to assess pre-/intratreatment hypoxia for all head and neck cancer, in which we hypothesized that pre- and early-treatment hypoxia assessment using functional positron emission tomography (PET) imaging may help select which human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive (HPV(+)) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients can safely receive radiation de-escalation without jeopardizing treatment outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with HPV(+) oropharyngeal carcinoma were enrolled on an institutional review board-approved prospective study of which de-escalation based on imaging response was done for node(s) only. Pretreatment (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose and dynamic (18)F-FMISO (fluoromisonidazole) positron emission tomography (PET) scans were performed. For patients with pretreatment hypoxia on(18)F-FMISO PET (defined as a >1.2 tumor to muscle standard uptake value ratio), a repeat scan was done 1 week after chemoradiation. Patients without pretreatment hypoxia or with resolution of hypoxia on repeat scan received a 10-Gy dose reduction to metastatic lymph node(s). The 2-year local, regional, distant metastasis-free, and overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. A subset of patients had biopsy of a hypoxic node done under image guidance. RESULTS: Thirty-three HPV(+) OPC patients were enrolled in this pilot study. One hundred percent showed pretreatment hypoxia (at primary site and/or node[s]), and among these, 48% resolved (at primary site and/or node[s]); 30% met criteria and received 10-Gy reduction to the lymph node(s). At the median follow-up of 32 months (range, 21-61 months), the 2-year locoregional control rate was 100%. One patient failed distantly with persistence of hypoxia on (18)F-FMISO PET. The 2-year distant metastasis-free rate was 97%. The 2-year OS rate was 100%. Hypoxia on imaging was confirmed pathologically. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxia is present in HPV(+) tumors but resolves within 1 week of treatment in 48% of cases either at the primary site and/or lymph node(s). Our 100% locoregional control rate suggests that intratreatment functional imaging used to selectively de-escalate node(s) to 60 Gy was confirmed safe using our stringent imaging criteria. Intratreatment functional imaging warrants further study to determine its ultimate role in de-escalation treatment strategies.
PURPOSE: To report a small substudy of an ongoing large, multi-arm study using functional imaging to assess pre-/intratreatment hypoxia for all head and neck cancer, in which we hypothesized that pre- and early-treatment hypoxia assessment using functional positron emission tomography (PET) imaging may help select which human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive (HPV(+)) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients can safely receive radiation de-escalation without jeopardizing treatment outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with HPV(+) oropharyngeal carcinoma were enrolled on an institutional review board-approved prospective study of which de-escalation based on imaging response was done for node(s) only. Pretreatment (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose and dynamic (18)F-FMISO (fluoromisonidazole) positron emission tomography (PET) scans were performed. For patients with pretreatment hypoxia on(18)F-FMISO PET (defined as a >1.2 tumor to muscle standard uptake value ratio), a repeat scan was done 1 week after chemoradiation. Patients without pretreatment hypoxia or with resolution of hypoxia on repeat scan received a 10-Gy dose reduction to metastatic lymph node(s). The 2-year local, regional, distant metastasis-free, and overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. A subset of patients had biopsy of a hypoxic node done under image guidance. RESULTS: Thirty-three HPV(+) OPC patients were enrolled in this pilot study. One hundred percent showed pretreatment hypoxia (at primary site and/or node[s]), and among these, 48% resolved (at primary site and/or node[s]); 30% met criteria and received 10-Gy reduction to the lymph node(s). At the median follow-up of 32 months (range, 21-61 months), the 2-year locoregional control rate was 100%. One patient failed distantly with persistence of hypoxia on (18)F-FMISO PET. The 2-year distant metastasis-free rate was 97%. The 2-year OS rate was 100%. Hypoxia on imaging was confirmed pathologically. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxia is present in HPV(+) tumors but resolves within 1 week of treatment in 48% of cases either at the primary site and/or lymph node(s). Our 100% locoregional control rate suggests that intratreatment functional imaging used to selectively de-escalate node(s) to 60 Gy was confirmed safe using our stringent imaging criteria. Intratreatment functional imaging warrants further study to determine its ultimate role in de-escalation treatment strategies.
Authors: Brita Singers Sørensen; Morten Busk; Michael R Horsman; Jan Alsner; Jens Overgaard; Alastair H Kyle; Andrew I Minchinton Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Jonathan J Beitler; Qiang Zhang; Karen K Fu; Andy Trotti; Sharon A Spencer; Christopher U Jones; Adam S Garden; George Shenouda; Jonathan Harris; Kian K Ang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J S Rasey; W J Koh; M L Evans; L M Peterson; T K Lewellen; M M Graham; K A Krohn Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1996-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Brian O'Sullivan; Shao Hui Huang; Lillian L Siu; John Waldron; Helen Zhao; Bayardo Perez-Ordonez; Ilan Weinreb; John Kim; Jolie Ringash; Andrew Bayley; Laura A Dawson; Andrew Hope; John Cho; Jonathan Irish; Ralph Gilbert; Patrick Gullane; Angela Hui; Fei-Fei Liu; Eric Chen; Wei Xu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeremy Setton; Nicola Caria; Jonathan Romanyshyn; Lawrence Koutcher; Suzanne L Wolden; Michael J Zelefsky; Nicholas Rowan; Eric J Sherman; Matthew G Fury; David G Pfister; Richard J Wong; Jatin P Shah; Dennis H Kraus; Weiji Shi; Zhigang Zhang; Karen D Schupak; Daphna Y Gelblum; Shyam D Rao; Nancy Y Lee Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Adam S Garden; Jonathan Harris; Andy Trotti; Christopher U Jones; Luis Carrascosa; Jonathan D Cheng; Sharon S Spencer; Arlene Forastiere; Randal S Weber; K Kian Ang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: C Cleary; J E Leeman; D S Higginson; N Katabi; E Sherman; L Morris; S McBride; N Lee; N Riaz Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar; Aditya Apte; Milan Grkovski; Jung Hun Oh; Nancy Y Lee; Heiko Schöder; John L Humm; Joseph O Deasy Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: N Patrik Brodin; Rafi Kabarriti; Mark Pankuch; Clyde B Schechter; Vinai Gondi; Shalom Kalnicki; Chandan Guha; Madhur K Garg; Wolfgang A Tomé Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mansoor M Ahmed; C Norman Coleman; Marc Mendonca; Soren Bentzen; Bhadrasain Vikram; Stephen M Seltzer; Dudley Goodhead; Ceferino Obcemea; Radhe Mohan; Kevin M Prise; Jacek Capala; Deborah Citrin; Gary Kao; Molykutty Aryankalayil; Iris Eke; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Pataje G S Prasanna; Fei-Fei Liu; Quynh-Thu Le; Beverly Teicher; David G Kirsch; DeeDee Smart; Joel Tepper; Silvia Formenti; Daphne Haas-Kogan; David Raben; James Mitchell Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Daniela Thorwarth; Stefan Welz; David Mönnich; Christina Pfannenberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Matthias Reimold; Christian La Fougère; Gerald Reischl; Paul-Stefan Mauz; Frank Paulsen; Markus Alber; Claus Belka; Daniel Zips Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Olivia J Kelada; Roy H Decker; Sameer K Nath; Kimberly L Johung; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Yiyun Huang; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Chi Liu; Richard E Carson; Uwe Oelfke; David J Carlson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038