Literature DB >> 33771135

Tendon-to-bone healing after repairing full-thickness rotator cuff tear with a triple-loaded single-row method in young patients.

He-Bei He1, Tao Wang2, Min-Cong Wang1, Hui-Feng Zhu1, Yue Meng1, Cheng-Long Pan3, Yong Hu4, Xiao-Min Chao1, Chun Yang Yang1, Min Wang5, Jian Feng Ou-Yang6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic repair is recommended for young patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCTs), but the healing rates have raised concerns. The Southern California Orthopedic Institute (SCOI) row method has been developed based on greater than 3 decades of experience with excellent clinical outcomes; however, studies with a focus on the younger patient population are limited in number. The current study assessed the short-term clinical outcome and the initial tendon-to-bone healing in a young cohort after repair of a full-thickness RCT using the SCOI row method.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients < 55 years of age who had a full-thickness RCT and underwent an arthroscopic repair using the SCOI row method were reviewed. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline, and 3 and 6 months post-operatively. The visual analog scale (VAS), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) scale, and Constant-Murley score were completed to assess pain and function. Active range of motion was also examined, including abduction and flexion of the involved shoulder. A preoperative MRI was obtained to assess the condition of the torn tendon, while 3- and 6-month postoperative MRIs were obtained to assess tendon-to-bone healing. Repeated measurement ANOVA and chi-square tests were used as indicated.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients (57 males and 32 females) with a mean age of 44.1 ± 8.6 years who met the criteria were included in the study. Compared with baseline, clinical outcomes were significantly improved 3 and 6 months postoperatively based on improvement in the VAS, UCLA score, and Constant-Murley score, as well as range of motion. Greater improvement was also noted at the 6-month postoperative assessment compared to the 3-month postoperative assessment. Three- and six-month postoperative MRIs demonstrated intact repairs in all shoulders and footprint regeneration, which supported satisfactory tendon-to-bone healing. The mean thickness of regeneration tissue was 7.35 ± 0.76 and 7.75 ± 0.79 mm as measured from the 3- and 6-month MRI (P = 0.002). The total satisfactory rate was 93.3 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic primary rotator cuff repair of a full-thickness RCT using the SCOI row method in patients < 55 years of age yields favorable clinical outcomes and early footprint regeneration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic repair; Bone marrow vents; Regeneration; Rotator cuff tear; Single‐row

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33771135      PMCID: PMC7995732          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04184-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  39 in total

1.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Analysis of results by tear size and by repair technique-margin convergence versus direct tendon-to-bone repair.

Authors:  S S Burkhart; S M Danaceau; C E Pearce
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  When do rotator cuff repairs fail? Serial ultrasound examination after arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Bruce S Miller; Brian K Downie; Robert B Kohen; Theresa Kijek; Bryson Lesniak; Jon A Jacobson; Richard E Hughes; James E Carpenter
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Arthroscopic repair of medium to large full-thickness rotator cuff tears: outcome at 2- to 6-year follow-up.

Authors:  Thomas F Murray; Georg Lajtai; Robert M Mileski; Stephen J Snyder
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  Factors affecting rotator cuff healing.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Miho J Tanaka; Luke S Choi; George A Paletta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  In Vivo Measurement of Rotator Cuff Tear Tension: Medial Versus Lateral Footprint Position.

Authors:  Brian D Dierckman; David W Wang; Michael S Bahk; Joseph P Burns; Mark H Getelman
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

6.  Failure with continuity in rotator cuff repair "healing".

Authors:  Jesse A McCarron; Kathleen A Derwin; Michael J Bey; Joshua M Polster; Jean P Schils; Eric T Ricchetti; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair.

Authors:  J K DeOrio; R H Cofield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Efficacy of marrow-stimulating technique in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Milano; Maristella F Saccomanno; Silvia Careri; Giuseppe Taccardo; Rocco De Vitis; Carlo Fabbriciani
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  The value of patient global assessment in lumbar spine surgery: an evaluation based on more than 90,000 patients.

Authors:  C Parai; O Hägg; B Lind; H Brisby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population.

Authors:  Atsushi Yamamoto; Kenji Takagishi; Toshihisa Osawa; Takashi Yanagawa; Daisuke Nakajima; Hitoshi Shitara; Tsutomu Kobayashi
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.