Literature DB >> 11694920

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Analysis of results by tear size and by repair technique-margin convergence versus direct tendon-to-bone repair.

S S Burkhart1, S M Danaceau, C E Pearce.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is 2-fold: To report the long-term functional results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (average, 3.5 years in this study), and to analyze results by tear size and repair technique (margin convergence v direct tendon-to-bone repair). TYPE OF STUDY: Case series.
METHODS: Between September 1993 and April 1997, 62 patients had an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair performed by the senior author (S.S.B.). Of this group, 59 patients (59 shoulders) were available for follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative function were assessed by means of a modified UCLA scoring system. Tears were categorized according to size (greatest diameter, number of tendons involved, and pattern of tear [crescent shape v U-shape]). Crescent-shaped tears were repaired in a direct tendon-to-bone fashion and U-shaped tears were repaired by a margin-convergence technique.
RESULTS: Good and excellent results were achieved in 95% of the cases, regardless of tear size. The large and massive tears did as well as the small and medium-sized tears. That is, results were independent of tear size (P >.05). Results of tears repaired by margin convergence were not significantly different statistically from those repaired by direct tendon-to-bone repair (P >.05), validating the selection criteria of U-shaped tears for repair by margin convergence. There is a rapid return to full overhead function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (average, 4 months for each tear size). Delay from injury to surgery, even of several years, did not adversely affect surgical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can achieve good and excellent results in a large percentage of patients (95% in this series). (2) Results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are independent of tear size. (3) U-shaped tears repaired by margin convergence have results comparable to those of crescent-shaped tears repaired directly by a tendon-to-bone technique. (4) There is a rapid return to full overhead function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (average, 4 months for all tear sizes). (5) A delay from injury to diagnosis, even of several years, is not a contraindication to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11694920     DOI: 10.1053/jars.2001.26821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  55 in total

1.  [New developments for the surgical treatment of shoulder problems].

Authors:  W Anderl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Tendon-grasping strength of various suture configurations for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Onur Hapa; F Alan Barber; Emin Sünbüloğlu; Yavuz Kocabey; Nazlı Sarkalkan; Gökhan Baysal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Repair of large supraspinatus rotator-cuff defects by infraspinatus and subscapularis tendon transfers in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Philip Kasten; Markus Loew; Markus Rickert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Indications for surgery in clinical outcome studies of rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Panagiotis Koulouvaris; Samuel K Chu; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a literature review.

Authors:  P Randelli; P Spennacchio; V Ragone; P Arrigoni; A Casella; P Cabitza
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-12-29

Review 6.  Massive rotator cuff tears: definition and treatment.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Philippe Collin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Should massive rotator cuff tears be reconstructed even when only partially repairable?

Authors:  Arnaud Godenèche; Benjamin Freychet; Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Julien Clechet; Yannick Carrillon; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Mapping the Diffusion of Technology in Orthopaedic Surgery: Understanding the Spread of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel C Austin; Michael T Torchia; Jonathan D Lurie; David S Jevsevar; John-Erik Bell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair: the eight-shape technique.

Authors:  Claudio Chillemi; Matteo Mantovani; Marcello Osimani; Alessandro Castagna
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-25

10.  Quantification of rotator cuff tear geometry: the repair ratio as a guide for surgical repair in crescent and U-shaped tears.

Authors:  Utku Kandemir; Robert B Allaire; Richard E Debski; Thay Q Lee; Patrick J McMahon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.