Literature DB >> 23019253

Failure with continuity in rotator cuff repair "healing".

Jesse A McCarron1, Kathleen A Derwin, Michael J Bey, Joshua M Polster, Jean P Schils, Eric T Ricchetti, Joseph P Iannotti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ten to seventy percent of rotator cuff repairs form a recurrent defect after surgery. The relationship between retraction of the repaired tendon and formation of a recurrent defect is not well defined. PURPOSE/ HYPOTHESES: To measure the prevalence, timing, and magnitude of tendon retraction after rotator cuff repair and correlate these outcomes with formation of a full-thickness recurrent tendon defect on magnetic resonance imaging, as well as clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that (1) tendon retraction is a common phenomenon, although not always associated with a recurrent defect; (2) formation of a recurrent tendon defect correlates with the timing of tendon retraction; and (3) clinical outcome correlates with the magnitude of tendon retraction at 52 weeks and the formation of a recurrent tendon defect. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Fourteen patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Tantalum markers placed within the repaired tendons were used to assess tendon retraction by computed tomography scan at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after operation. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess for recurrent tendon defects. Shoulder function was evaluated using the Penn score, visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, and isometric scapular-plane abduction strength.
RESULTS: All rotator cuff repairs retracted away from their position of initial fixation during the first year after surgery (mean [standard deviation], 16.1 [5.3] mm; range, 5.7-23.2 mm), yet only 30% of patients formed a recurrent defect. Patients who formed a recurrent defect tended to have more tendon retraction during the first 6 weeks after surgery (9.7 [6.0] mm) than those who did not form a defect (4.1 [2.2] mm) (P = .08), but the total magnitude of tendon retraction was not significantly different between patient groups at 52 weeks. There was no significant correlation between the magnitude of tendon retraction and the Penn score (r = 0.01, P = .97) or normalized scapular abduction strength (r = -0.21, P = .58). However, patients who formed a recurrent defect tended to have lower Penn scores at 52 weeks (P = .1).
CONCLUSION: Early tendon retraction, but not the total magnitude, correlates with formation of a recurrent tendon defect and worse clinical outcomes. "Failure with continuity" (tendon retraction without a recurrent defect) appears to be a common phenomenon after rotator cuff repair. These data suggest that repairs should be protected in the early postoperative period and repair strategies should endeavor to mechanically and biologically augment the repair during this critical early period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23019253     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512459477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  28 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for the assessment of the rotator cuff after repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Gianpiero Cazzato; Mario Fodale; Giuseppe Sircana; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The Rotator Cuff Organ: Integrating Developmental Biology, Tissue Engineering, and Surgical Considerations to Treat Chronic Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Benjamin B Rothrauff; Thierry Pauyo; Richard E Debski; Mark W Rodosky; Rocky S Tuan; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 3.  Enthesis Repair: Challenges and Opportunities for Effective Tendon-to-Bone Healing.

Authors:  Kathleen A Derwin; Leesa M Galatz; Anthony Ratcliffe; Stavros Thomopoulos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Multilayered electrospun scaffolds for tendon tissue engineering.

Authors:  Abby Chainani; Kirk J Hippensteel; Alysha Kishan; N William Garrigues; David S Ruch; Farshid Guilak; Dianne Little
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  [Arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery : New and established methods].

Authors:  S Pauly; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Growth factor delivery strategies for rotator cuff repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Anupama Prabhath; Varadraj N Vernekar; Enid Sanchez; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 5.875

7.  Influence of patient and diagnostic parameters on reported retear rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Andreas M Müller; Matthias Flury; Hasan N Alsayed; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Rotator cuff repair augmentation in a rat model that combines a multilayer xenograft tendon scaffold with bone marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  Rei Omi; Anne Gingery; Scott P Steinmann; Peter C Amadio; Kai-Nan An; Chunfeng Zhao
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Critical period and risk factors for retear following arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Johannes Barth; Kevin Andrieu; Elias Fotiadis; Gerjon Hannink; Renaud Barthelemy; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Current Status of Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Abby Chainani; Dianne Little
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.