Robert S Svatek1, Brent K Hollenbeck2, Sten Holmäng3, Richard Lee4, Simon P Kim5, Arnulf Stenzl6, Yair Lotan7. 1. Department of Urology, Division of Urologic Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. 2. Department of Urology, Division of Health Services Research and Division of Urologic Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. 4. Department of Urology and Division of Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Urology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 6. Department of Urology, Klinik für Urologie, Tübingen, Germany. 7. Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: yair.lotan@utsouthwestern.edu.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Due to high recurrence rates, intensive surveillance strategies, and expensive treatment costs, the management of bladder cancer contributes significantly to medical costs. OBJECTIVE: To provide a concise evaluation of contemporary cost-related challenges in the care of patients with bladder cancer. An emphasis is placed on the initial diagnosis of bladder cancer and therapy considerations for both non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and more advanced disease. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review of the literature was performed using Medline (1966 to February 2011). Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms for search criteria included "bladder cancer, neoplasms" OR "carcinoma, transitional cell" AND all cost-related MeSH search terms. Studies evaluating the costs associated with of various diagnostic or treatment approaches were reviewed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Routine use of perioperative chemotherapy following complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor has been estimated to provide a cost savings. Routine office-based fulguration of small low-grade recurrences could decrease costs. Another potential important target for decreasing variation and cost lies in risk-modified surveillance strategies after initial bladder tumor removal to reduce the cost associated with frequent cystoscopic and radiographic procedures. Optimizing postoperative care after radical cystectomy has the potential to decrease length of stay and perioperative morbidity with substantial decreases in perioperative care expenses. The gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen has been estimated to result in a modest increase in cost effectiveness over methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Additional costs of therapies need to be balanced with effectiveness, and there are significant gaps in knowledge regarding optimal surveillance and treatment of both early and advanced bladder cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of disease severity, improvements in the efficiency of bladder cancer care to limit unnecessary interventions and optimize effective cancer treatment can reduce overall health care costs. Two scenarios where economic and comparative-effectiveness research is limited but would be most beneficial are (1) the management of NMIBC patients where excessive costs are due to vigilant surveillance strategies and (2) in patients with metastatic disease due to the enormous cost associated with late-stage and end-of-life care.
CONTEXT: Due to high recurrence rates, intensive surveillance strategies, and expensive treatment costs, the management of bladder cancer contributes significantly to medical costs. OBJECTIVE: To provide a concise evaluation of contemporary cost-related challenges in the care of patients with bladder cancer. An emphasis is placed on the initial diagnosis of bladder cancer and therapy considerations for both non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and more advanced disease. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review of the literature was performed using Medline (1966 to February 2011). Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms for search criteria included "bladder cancer, neoplasms" OR "carcinoma, transitional cell" AND all cost-related MeSH search terms. Studies evaluating the costs associated with of various diagnostic or treatment approaches were reviewed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Routine use of perioperative chemotherapy following complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor has been estimated to provide a cost savings. Routine office-based fulguration of small low-grade recurrences could decrease costs. Another potential important target for decreasing variation and cost lies in risk-modified surveillance strategies after initial bladder tumor removal to reduce the cost associated with frequent cystoscopic and radiographic procedures. Optimizing postoperative care after radical cystectomy has the potential to decrease length of stay and perioperative morbidity with substantial decreases in perioperative care expenses. The gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen has been estimated to result in a modest increase in cost effectiveness over methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Additional costs of therapies need to be balanced with effectiveness, and there are significant gaps in knowledge regarding optimal surveillance and treatment of both early and advanced bladder cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of disease severity, improvements in the efficiency of bladder cancer care to limit unnecessary interventions and optimize effective cancer treatment can reduce overall health care costs. Two scenarios where economic and comparative-effectiveness research is limited but would be most beneficial are (1) the management of NMIBC patients where excessive costs are due to vigilant surveillance strategies and (2) in patients with metastatic disease due to the enormous cost associated with late-stage and end-of-life care.
Authors: Karsten Salomo; Doreen Huebner; Manja U Boehme; Alexander Herr; Werner Brabetz; Ulrike Heberling; Oliver W Hakenberg; Daniela Jahn; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Daniel Steinbach; Marcus Horstmann; Michael Froehner; Manfred P Wirth; Susanne Fuessel Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Alana Lelo; Frederik Prip; Brent T Harris; David Solomon; Deborah L Berry; Krysta Chaldekas; Anagha Kumar; Jeffry Simko; Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen; Pritish Bhattacharyya; Ciaran Mannion; Jung-Sik Kim; George Philips; Lars Dyrskjøt; Todd Waldman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J Palou; F Pisano; R Sylvester; S Joniau; V Serretta; S Larré; S Di Stasi; B van Rhijn; A J Witjes; A Grotenhuis; R Colombo; A Briganti; M Babjuk; V Soukup; P U Malmstrom; J Irani; N Malats; J Baniel; R Mano; T Cai; E K Cha; P Ardelt; J Varkarakis; R Bartoletti; G Dalbagni; S F Shariat; E Xylinas; R J Karnes; P Gontero Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Mario W Kramer; Jens J Rassweiler; Jan Klein; Alexey Martov; Nikolay Baykov; Lukas Lusuardi; Günter Janetschek; Rodolfo Hurle; Mathias Wolters; Mahmoud Abbas; Christoph A von Klot; Armin Leitenberger; Markus Riedl; Udo Nagele; Axel S Merseburger; Markus A Kuczyk; Marko Babjuk; Thomas R W Herrmann Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 4.226