Literature DB >> 33767333

Association between chronotype and psychomotor performance of rotating shift workers.

Dayane Eusenia Rosa1, Luisa Pereira Marot1, Marco Túlio de Mello2, Elaine Cristina Marqueze3, Fernanda Veruska Narciso2, Lúcio Borges de Araújo4, Cibele Aparecida Crispim5.   

Abstract

It is known that the chronotype potentially mediates the performance and tolerance to work in shifts and that shift rotation is associated with negative effects on psychomotor performance. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of chronotype on psychomotor performance throughout a complete shift rotation schedule. Thirty males working in clockwise rotating shifts from a mining company were evaluated under a real-life condition over the following shift schedule: 2 days of day work, 2 days of evening work and 2 days of night work. The chronotype was determined using the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire adapted for shift workers and the obtained scores were categorized by tertiles (early-type, intermediate-type and late-type). Work performance was evaluated by Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) daily just before shift starts and after shift ends. Sleep duration was evaluated by actigraphy over the whole shift. No isolated effect of the shift or interaction between shift and chronotype was found in the performance variables evaluated. A significant isolated effect of the chronotype showed that the early-type individuals had higher values of pre- and post-work Mean of Reaction Time (MRT) (308.77 ± 10.03 ms and 306.37 ± 8.53 ms, respectively) than the intermediate-type (257.61 ± 6.63 ms and 252.91 ± 5.97 ms, respectively, p < 0.001) and the late-type (273.35 ± 6.96 ms and 262.88 ± 6.05 ms, respectively, p < 0.001). In addition, late individuals presented a greater number of lapses of attention (5.00 ± 0.92; p < 0.05) than early (1.94 ± 0.50, p < 0.05) and intermediate (1.33 ± 0.30, p < 0.001) ones. We concluded that, compared with intermediates, late-type workers had a greater number of lapses of attention on the shift schedule as a whole, while early-type workers showed the highest pre- and post-work MRT. These findings show that the psychomotor performance of rotating shift workers seems to be influenced by the chronotype, but not by the shift rotation.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33767333     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86299-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  44 in total

1.  Diurnal patterns of activity of the orienting and executive attention neuronal networks in subjects performing a Stroop-like task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Tadeusz Marek; Magdalena Fafrowicz; Krystyna Golonka; Justyna Mojsa-Kaja; Halszka Oginska; Kinga Tucholska; Andrzej Urbanik; Ewa Beldzik; Aleksandra Domagalik
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Prevalence rates of work organization characteristics among workers in the U.S.: data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Toni Alterman; Sara E Luckhaupt; James M Dahlhamer; Brian W Ward; Geoffrey M Calvert
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 3.  Control of sleep and wakefulness.

Authors:  Ritchie E Brown; Radhika Basheer; James T McKenna; Robert E Strecker; Robert W McCarley
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  The relationship between shift work schedules and spillover in a sample of nurses.

Authors:  Jonas Rønningsdalen Kunst; Gøril Kvamme Løset; Daniel Hosøy; Bjørn Bjorvatn; Bente E Moen; Nils Magerøy; Ståle Pallesen
Journal:  Int J Occup Saf Ergon       Date:  2014

Review 5.  Characteristics of shift work and their impact on employee performance and wellbeing: A literature review.

Authors:  Chiara Dall'Ora; Jane Ball; Alejandra Recio-Saucedo; Peter Griffiths
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  Subjective and objective sleepiness among oil rig workers during three different shift schedules.

Authors:  Siri Waage; Anette Harris; Ståle Pallesen; Ingvild B Saksvik; Bente E Moen; Bjørn Bjorvatn
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  Sleep disorders, health, and safety in police officers.

Authors:  Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Laura K Barger; Steven W Lockley; Steven A Shea; Wei Wang; Christopher P Landrigan; Conor S O'Brien; Salim Qadri; Jason P Sullivan; Brian E Cade; Lawrence J Epstein; David P White; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  The role of sleep in regulating structural plasticity and synaptic strength: Implications for memory and cognitive function.

Authors:  Frank Raven; Eddy A Van der Zee; Peter Meerlo; Robbert Havekes
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 11.609

Review 9.  Systematic review of the relationship between quick returns in rotating shift work and health-related outcomes.

Authors:  Øystein Vedaa; Anette Harris; Bjørn Bjorvatn; Siri Waage; Børge Sivertsen; Philip Tucker; Ståle Pallesen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Shift rotation, circadian misalignment and excessive body weight influence psychomotor performance: a prospective and observational study under real life conditions.

Authors:  Dayane Eusenia Rosa; Luisa Pereira Marot; Marco Túlio de Mello; Fernanda Veruska Narciso; Bruno da Silva Brandão Gonçalves; Elaine Cristina Marqueze; Cibele Aparecida Crispim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  The relationship between chronotypes and musculoskeletal problems in male automobile manufacturing workers.

Authors:  Suwhan Kim; Won-Ju Park; Seunghyeon Cho; Dae-Young Lim; Yeongjae Yoo; Hyeonjun Kim; Wonyang Kang; Kyung Wook Kang; Jai-Dong Moon
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-08-13

2.  Working around the Clock: Is a Person's Endogenous Circadian Timing for Optimal Neurobehavioral Functioning Inherently Task-Dependent?

Authors:  Rachael A Muck; Amanda N Hudson; Kimberly A Honn; Shobhan Gaddameedhi; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Clocks Sleep       Date:  2022-02-11

3.  Player Chronotype Does Not Affect In-Game Performance during the Evening (>18:00 h) in Professional Male Basketball Players.

Authors:  Michael Pengelly; Nathan Elsworthy; Joshua Guy; Aaron Scanlan; Michele Lastella
Journal:  Clocks Sleep       Date:  2021-11-29

4.  Player chronotype does not affect shooting accuracy at different times of the day in a professional, male basketball team: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michael John Stacey Pengelly; Joshua H Guy; Nathan Elsworthy; Aaron T Scanlan; Michele Lastella
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.