Literature DB >> 33767170

Predicting treatment response from longitudinal images using multi-task deep learning.

Cheng Jin1, Heng Yu1, Jia Ke2,3, Peirong Ding4,5, Yongju Yi6, Xiaofeng Jiang2,3, Xin Duan2,3, Jinghua Tang4,5, Daniel T Chang1, Xiaojian Wu7,8, Feng Gao9,10, Ruijiang Li11.   

Abstract

Radiographic imaging is routinely used to evaluate treatment response in solid tumors. Current imaging response metrics do not reliably predict the underlying biological response. Here, we present a multi-task deep learning approach that allows simultaneous tumor segmentation and response prediction. We design two Siamese subnetworks that are joined at multiple layers, which enables integration of multi-scale feature representations and in-depth comparison of pre-treatment and post-treatment images. The network is trained using 2568 magnetic resonance imaging scans of 321 rectal cancer patients for predicting pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In multi-institution validation, the imaging-based model achieves AUC of 0.95 (95% confidence interval: 0.91-0.98) and 0.92 (0.87-0.96) in two independent cohorts of 160 and 141 patients, respectively. When combined with blood-based tumor markers, the integrated model further improves prediction accuracy with AUC 0.97 (0.93-0.99). Our approach to capturing dynamic information in longitudinal images may be broadly used for screening, treatment response evaluation, disease monitoring, and surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33767170      PMCID: PMC7994301          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22188-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  38 in total

Review 1.  A watch-and-wait approach for locally advanced rectal cancer after a clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fahima Dossa; Tyler R Chesney; Sergio A Acuna; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-05-04

2.  Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Using Deep Learning of Diffusion Kurtosis MRI.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Zhang; Lin Wang; Hai-Tao Zhu; Zhong-Wu Li; Meng Ye; Xiao-Ting Li; Yan-Jie Shi; Hui-Ci Zhu; Ying-Shi Sun
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study.

Authors:  Maxime J M van der Valk; Denise E Hilling; Esther Bastiaannet; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Geerard L Beets; Nuno L Figueiredo; Angelita Habr-Gama; Rodrigo O Perez; Andrew G Renehan; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Organ preservation for rectal cancer (GRECCAR 2): a prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Eric Rullier; Philippe Rouanet; Jean-Jacques Tuech; Alain Valverde; Bernard Lelong; Michel Rivoire; Jean-Luc Faucheron; Mehrdad Jafari; Guillaume Portier; Bernard Meunier; Igor Sileznieff; Michel Prudhomme; Frédéric Marchal; Marc Pocard; Denis Pezet; Anne Rullier; Véronique Vendrely; Quentin Denost; Julien Asselineau; Adélaïde Doussau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: results of the MERCURY study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Noninvasive imaging evaluation of tumor immune microenvironment to predict outcomes in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Y Jiang; H Wang; J Wu; C Chen; Q Yuan; W Huang; T Li; S Xi; Y Hu; Z Zhou; Y Xu; G Li; R Li
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study.

Authors:  Fiona G M Taylor; Philip Quirke; Richard J Heald; Brendan J Moran; Lennart Blomqvist; Ian R Swift; David Sebag-Montefiore; Paris Tekkis; Gina Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Dynamic-DeepHit: A Deep Learning Approach for Dynamic Survival Analysis With Competing Risks Based on Longitudinal Data.

Authors:  Changhee Lee; Jinsung Yoon; Mihaela van der Schaar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Siamese neural networks for continuous disease severity evaluation and change detection in medical imaging.

Authors:  Matthew D Li; Ken Chang; Ben Bearce; Connie Y Chang; Ambrose J Huang; J Peter Campbell; James M Brown; Praveer Singh; Katharina V Hoebel; Deniz Erdoğmuş; Stratis Ioannidis; William E Palmer; Michael F Chiang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-03-26
View more
  10 in total

1.  Multimodal deep learning model on interim [18F]FDG PET/CT for predicting primary treatment failure in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Cheng Yuan; Qing Shi; Xinyun Huang; Li Wang; Yang He; Biao Li; Weili Zhao; Dahong Qian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 2.  A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Ching-Wei Wang; Muhammad-Adil Khalil; Nabila Puspita Firdi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  CT-based radiomics in predicting pathological response in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Authors:  Qian Lin; Hai Jun Wu; Qi Shi Song; Yu Kai Tang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Predicting treatment response from longitudinal images using multi-task deep learning.

Authors:  Cheng Jin; Heng Yu; Jia Ke; Peirong Ding; Yongju Yi; Xiaofeng Jiang; Xin Duan; Jinghua Tang; Daniel T Chang; Xiaojian Wu; Feng Gao; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Automatic Segmentation of Metastatic Breast Cancer Lesions on 18F-FDG PET/CT Longitudinal Acquisitions for Treatment Response Assessment.

Authors:  Noémie Moreau; Caroline Rousseau; Constance Fourcade; Gianmarco Santini; Aislinn Brennan; Ludovic Ferrer; Marie Lacombe; Camille Guillerminet; Mathilde Colombié; Pascal Jézéquel; Mario Campone; Nicolas Normand; Mathieu Rubeaux
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Predicting pathologic complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy: a machine learning model using XGBoost.

Authors:  Xijie Chen; Wenhui Wang; Junguo Chen; Liang Xu; Xiaosheng He; Ping Lan; Jiancong Hu; Lei Lian
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Are We There Yet? The Value of Deep Learning in a Multicenter Setting for Response Prediction of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Barbara D Wichtmann; Steffen Albert; Wenzhao Zhao; Angelika Maurer; Claus Rödel; Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz; Jürgen Hesser; Frank G Zöllner; Ulrike I Attenberger
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30

8.  Early prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on longitudinal ultrasound images of HER2-positive breast cancer patients by Siamese multi-task network: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Ying Wang; Yuxiang Wang; Yu Xie; Yanfen Cui; Senwen Feng; Mengxia Yao; Bingjiang Qiu; Wenqian Shen; Dong Chen; Guoqing Du; Xin Chen; Zaiyi Liu; Zhenhui Li; Xiaotang Yang; Changhong Liang; Lei Wu
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-07-30

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Renal Pathology: Advances and Prospects.

Authors:  Yiqin Wang; Qiong Wen; Luhua Jin; Wei Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Deep learning methods may not outperform other machine learning methods on analyzing genomic studies.

Authors:  Yao Dong; Shaoze Zhou; Li Xing; Yumeng Chen; Ziyu Ren; Yongfeng Dong; Xuekui Zhang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.772

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.