Literature DB >> 33766814

A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response.

Linda R Duska1, Virginia L Filiaci2, Joan L Walker3, Laura L Holman3, Emily K Hill4, Richard G Moore5, Kari L Ring6, Michael L Pearl7, Carolyn Y Muller8, Christina L Kushnir9, Heather A Lankes10,11, Megan I Samuelson12, Kelley S Carrick13, Anand Rajan12, William H Rodgers14, Elise C Kohn15, Richard Piekarz15, Kimberly K Leslie4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This surgical window of opportunity (window) study assessed the short-term effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone versus MPA plus the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat on regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) in women with newly diagnosed endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multisite, randomized, open-label surgical window study treated women intramuscularly on day 1 with 400 mg MPA. Entinostat given 5 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15 was randomly assigned with equal probability. Surgery followed on days 21-24. Pretreatment and posttreatment tissue was assessed for PR H-scores, Ki-67 levels, and histologic response.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were accrued in 4 months; 22 and 20 participants had PR evaluable pretreatment and posttreatment slides in the MPA and MPA/entinostat arms, respectively. Median posttreatment PR H-scores were significantly lower than pretreatment H-scores in both arms but did not differ significantly (MPA: 247 vs. 27, MPA/entinostat 260 vs. 23, respectively, P = 0.87). Decreased Ki-67 was shown in 90% treated with MPA/entinostat compared with 68% treated with MPA alone (P = 0.13). Median PR H-score decreases were larger when Ki-67 was decreased (208) versus not decreased (45). The decrease in PR pretreatment versus posttreatment was associated with loss of Ki-67 nuclear staining, consistent with reduced cellular proliferation (P < 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: This surgical window trial rapidly accrued in a multisite setting and evaluated PR as its primary endpoint and Ki-67 as secondary endpoint. Despite no immediate effect of entinostat on PR in this short-term study, lessons learned can inform future window and treatment trials. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33766814      PMCID: PMC8127359          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  28 in total

Review 1.  Importance of the regulation of nuclear receptor degradation.

Authors:  A P Dennis; R U Haq; Z Nawaz
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2001-08-01

2.  Epigenetic modification restores functional PR expression in endometrial cancer cells.

Authors:  Shujie Yang; Xue Xiao; Yichen Jia; Xiaoyue Liu; Yuping Zhang; Xinjun Wang; Christopher J Winters; Eric J Devor; Xiangbing Meng; Kristina W Thiel; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 3.  Physiological action of progesterone in target tissues.

Authors:  J D Graham; C L Clarke
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 19.871

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Mitch Dowsett; D Craig Allred; Karen L Hagerty; Sunil Badve; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Glenn Francis; Neil S Goldstein; Malcolm Hayes; David G Hicks; Susan Lester; Richard Love; Pamela B Mangu; Lisa McShane; Keith Miller; C Kent Osborne; Soonmyung Paik; Jane Perlmutter; Anthony Rhodes; Hironobu Sasano; Jared N Schwartz; Fred C G Sweep; Sheila Taube; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul Valenstein; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel Visscher; Thomas Wheeler; R Bruce Williams; James L Wittliff; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  International Patterns and Trends in Endometrial Cancer Incidence, 1978-2013.

Authors:  Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Jacques Ferlay; Freddie Bray; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a dose-response study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Authors:  J T Thigpen; M F Brady; R D Alvarez; M D Adelson; H D Homesley; A Manetta; J T Soper; F T Given
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Progesterone receptor isoforms A and B: new insights into the mechanism of progesterone resistance for the treatment of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ruijin Shao
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2013-12-18

8.  Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Incidence Trends and Differences in Relative Survival Reveal Racial Disparities and Rising Rates of Nonendometrioid Cancers.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Susan S Devesa; Summer V Harvey; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Examestane in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a prospective phase II study by the Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NSGO).

Authors:  Kristina Lindemann; Susanne Malander; Rene D Christensen; Mansoor R Mirza; Gunnar B Kristensen; Elisabeth Aavall-Lundqvist; Ignace Vergote; Per Rosenberg; Karin Boman; Britta Nordstrøm
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Systematic dissection of the mechanisms underlying progesterone receptor downregulation in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Shujie Yang; Yichen Jia; Xiaoyue Liu; Christopher Winters; Xinjun Wang; Yuping Zhang; Eric J Devor; Adriann M Hovey; Henry D Reyes; Xue Xiao; Yang Xu; Donghai Dai; Xiangbing Meng; Kristina W Thiel; Frederick E Domann; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-10-30
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Vicky Makker; Helen MacKay; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Douglas A Levine; Shannon N Westin; Daisuke Aoki; Ana Oaknin
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 65.038

Review 2.  Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors: A Promising Therapeutic Alternative for Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Iason Psilopatis; Alexandros Pergaris; Constantinos Giaginis; Stamatios Theocharis
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.434

3.  Blocking autophagy overcomes resistance to dual histone deacetylase and proteasome inhibition in gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Jianling Bi; Yuping Zhang; Paige K Malmrose; Haley A Losh; Andreea M Newtson; Eric J Devor; Kristina W Thiel; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 8.469

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.