Literature DB >> 10561210

Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a dose-response study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

J T Thigpen1, M F Brady, R D Alvarez, M D Adelson, H D Homesley, A Manetta, J T Soper, F T Given.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Progestins have definite activity against advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Both parenteral and oral progestins yield similar serum levels and response rates, which range from 18% to 34%. The one major study that used oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) noted a response rate at the lower end of the range (18%) and much poorer progression-free and overall survival times (4 and 10.5 months, respectively) than previously reported. The present study sought to confirm this earlier study of oral MPA, to assess the importance of prognostic factors such as histologic grade and receptor levels, and to determine whether a higher dose of MPA would yield a higher response rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred ninety-nine eligible women with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma were randomized to receive oral MPA either 200 mg/d or 1, 000 mg/d until unacceptable toxicity intervened or their disease progressed.
RESULTS: Among 145 patients receiving the low-dose regimen, there were 25 complete (17%) and 11 partial (8%) responses for an overall response rate of 25%. The 154 patients receiving the high-dose regimen experienced 14 (9%) complete and 10 (6%) partial responses for an overall response rate of 15%. Median durations of progression-free survival were 3.2 months and 2.5 months for the low-dose and high-dose regimens, respectively. Median survival durations were 11.1 months and 7.0 months, respectively. The adjusted relative odds of responding to the high-dose regimen compared with the low-dose regimen was 0.61 (90% confidence interval, 0.36 to 1.04). Prognostic factors having a significant impact on the probability of response included initial performance status, age, histologic grade, and progesterone receptor concentration. Compliance with oral therapy was documented with serum levels 1 month after starting therapy, when possible. MPA levels were commensurate with the assigned dose and schedule.
CONCLUSION: Oral MPA is active against endometrial carcinoma. Response to progestin therapy is more frequent among patients with a well-differentiated histology and positive progesterone receptor status. This study provides no evidence to support the use of MPA 1,000 mg/d orally instead of MPA 200 mg/d orally. In fact, the trends suggest the opposite. The use of oral MPA 200 mg/d is a reasonable initial approach to the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, particularly those lesions that are well-differentiated and/or progesterone receptor-positive (> 50 fmol/mg cytosol protein). Patients with poorly differentiated and/or progesterone receptor levels less than 50 fmol/mg cytosol protein had only an 8% to 9% response rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561210     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  89 in total

1.  SEOM guidelines for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ana Oaknin; Víctor Rodríguez-Freixinós; Isabela Díaz de Corcuera; Fernando Rivera; José María del Campo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Treatment considerations in advanced endometrial cancer.

Authors:  James E Kendrick; Warner K Huh
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Epigenetic modification restores functional PR expression in endometrial cancer cells.

Authors:  Shujie Yang; Xue Xiao; Yichen Jia; Xiaoyue Liu; Yuping Zhang; Xinjun Wang; Christopher J Winters; Eric J Devor; Xiangbing Meng; Kristina W Thiel; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Antiestrogen therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer resulting in 28 months of stable disease: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Rajul Kothari; Peter Argenta; Jeffrey Fowler; Jori Carter; William Shimp
Journal:  Arch Oncol       Date:  2010

5.  Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer and matrix metalloproteinase-2 overexpression is associated with loss of hormone receptor expression and poor prognosis in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan; Ning Shen; Shu-Yan Yang; Ling Zhao; Yong-Mei Guan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  A phase II trial of trebananib (AMG 386; IND#111071), a selective angiopoietin 1/2 neutralizing peptibody, in patients with persistent/recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium: An NRG/Gynecologic Oncology Group trial.

Authors:  Kathleen N Moore; Michael W Sill; Meaghan E Tenney; Christopher J Darus; David Griffin; Theresa L Werner; Peter G Rose; Robert Behrens
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Temsirolimus with or without megestrol acetate and tamoxifen for endometrial cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Gini F Fleming; Virginia L Filiaci; Brandon Marzullo; Richard J Zaino; Susan A Davidson; Michael Pearl; Vicky Makker; James J Burke; Susan L Zweizig; Linda Van Le; Parviz Hanjani; Gordon Downey; Joan L Walker; Henry D Reyes; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Treatment of Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer and Complex Atypical Hyperplasia With the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device.

Authors:  Navdeep Pal; Russell R Broaddus; Diana L Urbauer; Nyla Balakrishnan; Andrea Milbourne; Kathleen M Schmeler; Larissa A Meyer; Pamela T Soliman; Karen H Lu; Pedro T Ramirez; Lois Ramondetta; Diane C Bodurka; Shannon N Westin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Hormonal treatment in recurrent and metastatic gynaecological cancers: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Dirkje W Sommeijer; Katrin M Sjoquist; Michael Friedlander
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  The use of steroid sulfatase inhibitors as a novel therapeutic strategy against hormone-dependent endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Paul A Foster; L W Lawrence Woo; Barry V L Potter; Michael J Reed; Atul Purohit
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 4.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.